Jump to content

User talk:JamesRushLTU

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 04:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, JamesRushLTU! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 04:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 22:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 17:13, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Message regarding your recent...

[edit]

...submission at Articles for Creation. Please do not attempt to submit it again. There are too many reviewers who are needlessly opinionated concerning church related organizations reviewing the articles. They will not even necessarily review your sources, just dismiss them as taking to long to review. Your best bet is to move your draft to User:JamesRush/Lutheran Education Association. Then, continue to improve the article. When you finally are done, move the article directly into the "article" section. It will be reviewed the same day, and the person reviewing is way less likely to be hostile. Also, if you put the {WikiProject Lutheranism|lutheranism-importance=| } (with two brackets, not one) template onto the talk page, it will be reviewed by a second reviewer who is interested in Lutheranism topics. If you continue to attempt to create this article through the community draft feature, expect to have someone put up a "STOP" button as they did here: Draft:Lutheran Indian Ministries. Once they do that, you can't submit it again or you could be blocked or banned from Wikipedia for a time.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 00:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some third party sources which could potentially help prevent your LEA article from being deleted. In theory an organization needs substantial coverage in three third party sources to stave off a deletion attempt. I'm not sure how substantive some of these are, as some of these don't have any or much "free preview" on Google Books. At the Articles for Deletion, standards very widely as to what counts as substantive. So it is better to have more than three in case one of them doesn't meet the cut. All of these should be considered third party, as they are not published by the LEA. The best one might be the thesis paper.

https://books.google.com/books?id=KL2RZwEACAAJ https://books.google.com/books?id=uaGO861TV_kC&pg=PA31

https://books.google.com/books?id=GeceAQAAMAAJ&q=lutheran+education+association&dq=lutheran+education+association&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiCu8eVqa_oAhXBZc0KHZh-DME4ChDoATAFegQIBBAC

https://books.google.com/books?id=8e7qAAAAMAAJ&q=lutheran+education+association&dq=lutheran+education+association&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiCu8eVqa_oAhXBZc0KHZh-DME4ChDoATAGegQICBAC

https://books.google.com/books?id=VN8TAAAAIAAJ&q=lutheran+education+association&dq=lutheran+education+association&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjo96vPqa_oAhUWU80KHaqFBN84FBDoATABegQIBRAC

An Introduction to the Foundations of Lutheran Education by William C. Rietschel (especially not sure about this one)

--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 00:27, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamesRushLTU. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lutheran Education Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 01:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]