User talk:JamesChambers666

Welcome!

Hello, JamesChambers666, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who put a certain post on a talk page. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! —Ute in DC (talk) 08:47, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What are the four general rules at Wikipedia?

The four general rules are to respect your fellow Wikipedians, remain neutral, cite your sources, and to ignore a rule if it prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia.

How do I edit a page?

Click 'Edit this page' or 'Edit' on the top of the page that you want to edit.
Make your changes in the edit window.
Preview your changes by clicking the 'Show preview' button.
Click the 'Save page' button.

See Wikipedia:How to edit a page for more detailed information.

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

Please use the Article Wizard to create one, then add references to the article as explained below.

What are references, sources, and citations all about?

All claims must be supported by a book, website, or news organization independent of the subject of the article. The source must be reliable, meaning it cannot be a blog, MySpace page, or personal website. This makes it difficult, if not impossible, to prove that an inaccurate statement is true, and that it should stay in the article. The policy regarding this states that the statement has to be verifiable, not necessarily true. See Wikipedia:Verifiability for more information.

How do I insert a reference into an article?

For inline references:

Do a search on Ask.com, Google, or your preferred search engine for the subject of the article that you want to put a reference in.
Click 'Edit this page' or 'Edit' in the Wikipedia article, and insert a claim into that article stating a fact about the subject. Don't click the save button just yet.
In the search you did in step 1, find a website that supports the claim you made in step 2. Highlight the address in the address bar (where it says http://www.some-website.com/some-page.htm).
Go to the reference generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out the as many fields as you can. Then click 'Get reference wiki text'.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text.
In the article, after the claim you made in step 2, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied in step 5.
If the article does not have a References, Footnotes, Notes, or Bibliography section, then add this below the See Also section and above the External Links section:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

For references put at the end of an article:

Do a search on Ask.com, Google, or your preferred search engine for the subject of the article that you want to put a reference in.
In the search, find a website that supports the claims made in the article. Highlight the address in the address bar (where it says http://www.some-website.com/some-page.htm).
Go to the reference generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out the as many fields as you can. Then click 'Get reference wiki text'.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text.
Go to the Wikipedia article. If the article does not have a References, Footnotes, Notes, or Bibliography section, then add this below the See Also section and above the External Links section:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

Then, add this after the {{Reflist}}, in a new line:

{{Refbegin}}
*Press paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) after this asterisk, then remove the <ref></ref> tags

{{Refend}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

How do I format text on Wikipedia?

See Wikipedia:Cheatsheet.

Sylvia the Fair

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sylvia the Fair, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://poetry.poetryx.com/poems/1874.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 09:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sylvia the Fair

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sylvia the Fair requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ravendrop 09:33, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sylvia (again)

Hi James, welcome to Wikipedia! Sorry for the tags above, they were placed in error. Thanks for adding Sylvia the Fair, but although it is in the public domain, Wikipedia is not a repository for public domain content. Fortunately, our sister-project Wikisource does exactly this. I've added a template to the top of the page which should get it transfered over ("transwikied") in the next week or so. If it doesn't, I might do it myself. I hope that helps. If you have any more questions, please feel free to ask me on my talkpage! -- Lear's Fool 10:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User: Lear's Fool!. I really appreciate it. JamesChambers666 (talk) 21:05, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamesChambers666. You have new messages at Moonriddengirl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Comment

I saw your question to Moonriddengirl. Please see this page, Vladimir Putin's Second Cabinet and various pages in Category:Government of Russia. Hodja Nasreddin (talk) 23:06, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Best Russian source about this on the internet by Pribylovsky if can read or translate Russian.Hodja Nasreddin (talk) 01:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Rick Ross (consultant), you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 14:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion

I am not qualified to give a third opinion, as I have pretty much no knowledge on the topic. However I did see the other edit warring so I placed a warning template on his talk page. Keep up the great work! Intoronto1125TalkContributions 18:57, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do not out other editors.

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have repeatedly tried to provide personal information about Keyser Sözetigho, and accurate or not that is not allowed. The editor has specifically declined to reveal their real identity, it is not your place to do so. One more attempt to do so, and you will be indefinitely blocked from Wikipedia. -- Atama頭 19:17, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is relevant given his obvious conflict of interest. I'll be taking it up with other administrators. He is running a personal blog that is attacking an organization and then attacking that organization here. Please review my edits. You will find that I have no ax to grind.--JamesChambers666 (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well James I see you are still obsessing and attracting Mr.tighe, me and a blog. First I will not confirm or deney who I am I take my name Keyser Sözetigho from the movie the Usual suspects. I had quite a bit of difficulty in getting Keyser Söze as it appears to be a popular moniker. The usual suspects is my favorite movie and I am a fan of the blog Saratogaindecline. Maybe I took some NXIVM classes and want my money back. Maybe my 18 year old sister joined this cult or one like i. Maybe I’m related to 35-year-old Kristin Snyder the environmentalist who vanished from an Alaska hotel after taking NXIVM classes. Her body was never found. But you seem to think I’m posting from “Russian servers” Perhaps with your keen investigative skills you should be in law enforcement I see you chose the numbers 666 in your name. I believe that is the number of the beast. Did I accuse you of being a beast? Instead of obsessing over my identity why don’t you concentrate on my edits? I’m sure you don’t like them but each one is referenced to a publication and not cult recurring material. I find the unsubstantiated claims of Mr.Ranier to be the smartest, fastest and also good at judo absurd. Wiki administrators are well aware that I and link 1914 are at different locations using different computers but you complain away. I guess next you will claim I’m using a proxy. Wiki isn’t about you promoting NXIVM but about fair neutral information. I am thinking of starting some wiki pages of my own. 1. On the disappearance of Kristin Snyder 2. The highly controversial visit of the NXIVM sponsored trip of the Dali Lama to Albany You will of course be able to enter your own edits if they need wiki NPOV standards Keyser Sözetigho (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:29, 26 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

This is funny, I choose 1914 as it was widely predicted to be the year the world would end. I thought it apropos a as a Christian cult predicted this year. Little did I know that number would link me to a conspiracy involving "Russians” Good thing I didn’t choose 1917,that would make me a Bolshevik or heaven forbid 2001 that would make a terrorist.Link1914 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:23, 26 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

"isn’t about you promoting NXIVM but about fair neutral information" What part of that don't you understand. Cutting and posting material from NXIVM produced propaganda is far from neutral.All I am doing is presenting a balanced view. So if NXIVM is a cult that is my belief others can decide whatever they want. But this is not a promotional website for NXIVMLink1914 (talk)

Review my edits. You will find that I never once copied and pasted anything about NXIVM or anything else.JamesChambers666 (talk) 03:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

...for your contributions to NXIVM! Chrisrus (talk) 04:14, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on NXIVM Page

Hi JamesChambers, I have been reviewing your edits on the NXIVM page and wanted to thank you for them! U21980 (talk) 04:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes perhaps you are right. NXIVM is nothing but the world’s best self-improvement program lead by the smartest and most ethical man in the world. Now I suppose you want to go on to Jeffrey Dahmer and for the sake of neutrality describe him as having an unusual eating disorder.Keyser Sözetigho (talk)

I believe it was in bad faith for you to heavily edit the article on NXIVM and then agree to and support a no editing agreement. This is typical NXIVM behavior.Link1914 (talk)

Keyser and Link, one and the same person, confirmed by admin (see post below), are you really going to accuse James of bad faith on Wikipedia when you were parading around with two usernames making non-neutral edits to pages? U21980 (talk) 16:07, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Link1914 is Keyser

The following message was recently posted on a board by an admin: Comment: Just as a heads-up to all involved in this discussion, it was confirmed that Link1914 == Keyser Sözetigho. I've blocked Link as a sockpuppet but have left Keyser Sözetigho alone as he is involved in this discussion. If you have any questions about this, please feel free to ask me. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 15:27, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks JamesChambers for filing the petition to get confirm this link. I would have done it myself but since I have recently joined Wikipedia, I am still learning all the ins and outs that come along with it. U21980 (talk) 16:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So as you know Jim being an employees of NXIVM, NXIVM critics only post from public portals. They have to be very carefull for their own safety. Prehaps if you read the entire newspaper accounts instead of posting carefully placed edits you would relieze that, So link and Soze shared a portal that doesn’t stop the campaign for fairness and objectivity. Till next time I will edit for fairness,carefully cite my sources and if at the end of the day nxivm apears to be a cult,maybe thats because it is.NXIVMwatch (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

I would like a citation for the information you have already posted on here that indicate the following: "Jim being an employees of NXIVM, NXIVM critics only post from public portals." As far I can tell, I haven't seen any NXIVM employees roaming about, but I have seen plenty NXIVM critics (two - three if you count Link and Keyser as one person just one). So if these are baseless accusations that are being spread, I would appreciate it if we do not post them in the first place (you have made the same accusations about me). U21980 (talk) 23:35, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sylvia the Fair

The article Sylvia the Fair has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Transwiki'd article to enWS (per request). Alternatively redirect this to author's page, list work there with a wikilink to s:Sylvia the Fair

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Thought you might like a beer. Chrisrus (talk) 05:32, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]