User talk:Jalijah Aubry
Jalijah Aubry, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Jalijah Aubry! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC) |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Jalijah Aubry, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Christian De miranda Jalijah Aubry Wikipedia draft peer review.
What type of perceptions on social media platforms. What cultural groups are affected? What typos of false interpretations and stereotypes or portrayed? The last sentence “The representation of certain cultural groups is followed by the demographic groups that show the most interest.” Is confusing. I think you are trying to say the majority demographic that represents ethnicity's is white, and they are also the targeted audience in the media, since in the media, the elite people with power are mostly white and have all the control of what they decide to broadcast. I don’t exactly see where your sources are, or if you have any besides that one-foot note. I think your sentence about how negative stereotypes are projected by social media and shows, and how in contrast the BET shows goal orientated, and positive ads that represent healthy black lifestyles. Maybe go into more detail about that. Few more minor critiques and I think you should be set to go. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Demiranda23 (talk • contribs) 04:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of African American Evolution in media
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on African American Evolution in media requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 23:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of African American Evolution in media for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article African American Evolution in media is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/African American Evolution in media until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 02:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)