User talk:Jaisgossman

Your draft article, Draft:Colundi

Hello, Jaisgossman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Colundi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:31, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jaisgossman! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Are deleted pages archived somewhere?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Colundi

The article Colundi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Previously deleted, refunded and again sitting unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 10:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jaisgossman! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Proper (minimal) Formatting for a See Also Section, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Colundi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colundi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colundi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:13, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

When an editor has made a series of edits that you approve of, it is nice to thank that editor. But a single thanks on the first or last edit of the series, or the one that seems most important to you, is sufficient. Dealing with repetitive thanks notices can actually become a minor nuisance. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 16:28, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Colundi

Hello, Jaisgossman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Colundi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]