User talk:JadeOwl

Aurora Snow

Actually, you can use the same page as a cite twice. Look at the references in the article as it stands now: the Rog Reviews interview (#1) is used 4 times and the XRCO winners page is used three times. So point to the page where the "boobs are real" info can be found. Tabercil 23:07, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Easy, go to the source by her breast measurements. Jade Owl 18:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. JayHenry 19:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that I didn't explain this better and I am also sorry that I incorrectly identified the edits as vandalism. I see that this is not the case and I sincerely apologize. I reverted your edits because your change of "rectangular" to "banana" introduced an inaccuracy to the story -- the researchers from NC State specifically use the term "rectangular." This was already cited in the article, so you can check this by following the external links. Right now it says the NC State researchers identified 40 percent of women as "banana" and that's inaccurate -- the researchers identified them as "rectangular." What I saw was somebody changing cited information to something that specifically was contradicted by the citation, which is why I reverted it. I incorrectly assumed you were a new user because there was only one comment on your talk page. I apologize for the misunderstanding. This was overly-hasty of me and I really am sorry. --JayHenry 21:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. I guess they interchange the term. Thanks for the clarification. Jade Owl 15:05, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Emetophobia

Something went awry with your edit of Emetophobia, and I reverted it. Please take a look. `'Míkka 02:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ed, Edd n Eddy Images

PLEASE leave the image sizes on List of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy alone. They are already too large. -- Elaich ^talk 01:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should size down the other images and make that one larger. It's hard to see, unbalanced and not professional or ideal looking for a website. Take it from a web designer with a college degree. Jade Owl 20:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Seriously Dude, Where's My Car?

An article that you have been involved in editing, Seriously Dude, Where's My Car?, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seriously Dude, Where's My Car?. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JohnCD (talk) 16:35, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]