User talk:Jada Feiri

Welcome!

Hello, Jada Feiri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ryokyu Endo, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 00:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryokyu Endo

The article Ryokyu Endo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 00:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryokyu Endo

The article Ryokyu Endo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Michitaro (talk) 01:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, I'm Wgolf. I noticed that you removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD and I wanted to let you know that I have replaced it. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 01:17, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing well-sourced material

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:52, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Human. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 16:18, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 11 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Gary Yourofsky page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pig article

Hi. You have been adding unsourced material to the Pig article. All WP edits should be verifiable. Please include appropriate sources with information you insert. Thank you. DrChrissy ^(talk) 17:55, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Emma Watson has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 20:33, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carole Madrzak

The article Carole Madrzak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 22:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carole Madrzak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carole Madrzak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carole Madrzak until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 03:49, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I noticed that you recently removed content from Madison, Wisconsin without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sumanuil. 04:02, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]