User talk:Jacobchoi20

Block evasion

If you were blocked as you claim, evading the block(WP:EVADE) by creating more accounts will just make things worse. – 143.208.239.226 (talk) 01:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@143.208.239.226 What is this user's blocked account(s)? ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, but they created another account with that as their reason. See their logs (not edit filter logs, real logs). – 143.208.239.226 (talk) 01:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My block account was User:AirbusA350500, which was my colleague’s. It was accused for vandalism, but my colleague did not mean to. Jacobchoi20 (talk) 01:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, cease the block evasion immediately. Second of all, that account has contribs and filter log nuked, so ask an admin to unblock it on the account you were banned. This account will likely be indef blocked. 01:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC) ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but I forgot my password. Jacobchoi20 (talk) 01:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But am I in big trouble? Jacobchoi20 (talk) 01:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me !! Jacobchoi20 (talk) 01:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Am I going to get blocked? If yes, for how long? Jacobchoi20 (talk) 01:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AirbusA350500. I have opened a SPI case. While I know that you didn't read Help:I have been blocked, so you proceeded to block evasion, you are... kinda in a trouble. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OH NO! I DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO DO !! Jacobchoi20 (talk) 01:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SORRY I DID NOT MEAN TO Jacobchoi20 (talk) 01:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You'd be a lot more believable if you hadn't done this song-and-dance as an IP in User_talk:220.255.180.65#Abusive_Wikipedian_Administrators. – 143.208.239.226 (talk) 02:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm puzzled, what the actual hell happened? ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AlphaBetaGamma: I think maybe we should heed Bbb23's advice on that talk page. And honestly, I don't know, someone bored maybe. – 143.208.239.226 (talk) 02:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, sure I guess, this talk was already getting unproductive. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know what just happened. Jacobchoi20 (talk) 02:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Jacobchoi20 (talk) 02:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should I delete it? I misspoke. Jacobchoi20 (talk) 02:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:AirbusA350500 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AirbusA350500. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 03:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per evidence of what? There was no evidence in the page. Jacobchoi20 (talk) 00:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, you literally confessed you are AirbusA350500 in your own talk page ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:29, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jacobchoi20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Actually, my aspiration in Wikipedia was not to vandalize it, but to be an administrator protecting it.

Decline reason:

This doesn't address your sockpuppetry at all. Yamla (talk) 10:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jacobchoi20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please note that I intended to use my Jacobchoi20 account to become a better Wikipedian, as stated at the talk page of my IP talk page. But please check the logs, as I accidentally deleted it when I was trying to remove irrelevant stuff from it.

Decline reason:

Obvious sock puppetry. There's no way I'm entertaining this request. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Jacobchoi20, sockpuppets aren't unbanned if my memory is correct. Appeal the ban on the Airbus account. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 06:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ABG, how is this possible if I have forgotten about my account password? Jacob (Talk) 16:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you have, state that you will use this account and this account only going forward. Also, disclose all other accounts you created, whether or not you actually edited with them, regardless of whether they were flushed out by the SPI and checkuser. Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sir Daniel Case Oops, I actually wanted to use this account for myself, and my colleague’s account for theirs. Jacob (talk) 08:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't make sense ... Daniel Case (talk) 18:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sir Daniel Case They will definitely fire me if I do not return my colleague back their account. Jacob (talk) 03:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, can't they just change the password and take it back themselves? Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sir Daniel Case Oh, both of us forgot our password. 😅 Jacob (talk) 00:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned in your other, sock pages. Passwords can be reset for each account here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PasswordReset --Picard's Facepalm • ^{Made It So} _Engage! • 13:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Somewhat Argument

I am writing to tell you about the therefore situation in this talk page. Instead of the usual praises some users get from random administrators, I get random blocks and warnings from them. I did everything I could to stop these.

I would like to tell you about my latest discussion privately in my office with my colleagues. One of them was AirbusA350500.

They came up to me and three of my other colleagues, as if they were in a horrible mood. We tried to calm them down. It was apparent that they were angry because they were blocked from editing Wikipedia indefinitely. I was the literal one that came up to them and looked through their talk page, filled with a lot of warnings regarding some speedy deletions about our creations. What they had done was not to do anything wrong. I was really disappointed on how everyone involved, such as DoubleGrazing and Picard's Facepalm, tried to prevent my dear colleague from doing something they were literally supposed to do - which was not vandalism.

Please note that this involved my CEO, too. They wanted to state that this was unappreciative to the whole company and it was extremely disrespectful towards us. This should stop now. I hope this matter is looked into and someone takes necessary action. I look for someone’s reply. Thank you. Jacob (talk) 10:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't ping me, I've no interest in this matter.

Note also that as a blocked user, you should only be editing your talk page to appeal your block. Random ramblings like this may result in your talk page editing privileges being revoked.

And finally, although you stop short of making an actual legal threat, your last paragraph seems to be heading in that general direction. Please be aware that legal threats are not tolerated on Wikipedia, so steer well clear of anything of that nature. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also have no further interest and was also advised on one of the other talk pages to disengage, which I have. I will only comment the following and then take my leave of the issue: The reasons for the notices, reverts, warnings and blocks are very clearly spelled out on each of the talk pages for each account and IP used to conduct the edits. Read them & understand them. Read the links referenced in each of the notices, warnings and blocks - and understand them as well. Follow the instructions, policies and rules referenced in each of the notices, warnings and blocks accordingly - I promise they are not that hard. Countless thousands of other editors do it every day. That's all the more advice I can give. _Engage! • --Picard's Facepalm • ^{Made It So} _Engage! • 14:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At this point, the "necessary action" ought to be your talk page access being revoked. Admins have been extremely patient with you despite your continuous vandalism and sockpuppetry, even going so far as saying little about your continually changing, implausible tales of what's going on. This last bit of text is ample demonstration that, at this point, you should not be involved in this project in any way whatsoever. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 15:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TPA Revoked by Oshwah. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 22:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]