User talk:Jacob Gamaly

This is Jacob Gamaly's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jacob Gamaly/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Jacob Gamaly/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 10:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jacob Gamaly! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 10:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Jacob Gamaly/sandbox

Hello, Jacob Gamaly. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 11:48, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacob Gamaly

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jacob Gamaly, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Amkgp 💬 17:17, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Jacob Gamaly

The page User:Jacob Gamaly has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. creffett (talk) 19:20, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Simba Sports Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Community Shield. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiography - a bad idea

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Jacob Gamaly. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 07:50, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adel Rahman (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL, has not played a competitive game in a fully professional league - (see list of fully professional leagues kept by WikiProject Football).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adel Rahman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adel Rahman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:07, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Adel Rahman

Hello, Jacob Gamaly. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adel Rahman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:04, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GSM Group (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rich Smith were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GSM Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 01:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rich, Thanks for your time to review my Draft, but please this is kind of new company here in Tanzania, and the sources i used there its reliable and credible in our society , please just preview my External source link's to see hoe this company is notable in our society.

Thanks. Jacob Gamaly (talk) 01:38, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jacob Gamaly. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page GSM Group, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:2678:4134:98D9:87FF:FE5C:6E45 (talk) 12:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ghalib Said Mohammed

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ghalib Said Mohammed, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Java Hurricane 12:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GSM Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GSM Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Java Hurricane 12:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UNBLOCK REQUEST

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jacob Gamaly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hope you are all healthy, I am writing to request permission to continue writing on Wikipedia, this is due to the following reasons:-

1. For a long time I have been spending time reading and learning with this platform, this led me to want to know more about Wikipedia and finally open my account as a regular user.

2. After opening my regular account, with the knowledge and education I have, I was able to help improve the various information available on Wikipedia, especially for those available in Tanzania, examples of the work I reviewed and improved include the Page of Simba SC, Yanga SC, and others.

3. After seeing my improvements on those pages published, I found myself wanting to write some pages as well, and here I confess and know that I wanted to write a page about myself without knowing that doing so is wrong according to the law of Wikipedia.

After discovering that, I started writing pages for different people for payment, where I started by writing to a football player from Canada, who has Pakistani citizenship, but that page did not meet the requirements of Wikipedia so I informed the target and after that I did not continue writing pages .

4. Recently, I got a paid job writing two pages, the first for GSM Group and the second for the owner of the company Mr. Ghalib Said Mohamed, the company is very famous in Tanzania and Forbes magazine has mentioned its owner as one of the billionaires those present in Tanzania.

5. After writing the pages, I made sure to ensure that they correspond to Wikipedia's requirements by following all the guidelines and rules for writing pages.

6. Those pages were successfully published yesterday and I sent the link of the job to those who gave me the job, a few minutes before it was deleted because as explained that I have a personal interest in those pages, either I am an employee or the owner of those pages so I use Wikipedia to advertise my businesses.

7. This morning I received another message saying that I have stopped writing on Wikipedia for an unknown period of time.

8. I come before you to make it clear that I have nothing to do with those pages, other than being asked to write them with an agreement to be paid a small wage, the above-mentioned pages belong to a famous person and a big company here in Tanzania, so I ask you to allow me to continue writing on Wikipedia.

9. I promise that from now on I will be more careful and going through all the writing guidelines on Wikipedia to avoid such mistakes and others.

10. I request that to be unblocked and allowed again to use a Wikipedia as a contributor because after getting the tender of writing those two pages( GSM Group and Ghalib Said Mohamed), I have found myself changing attitude about this Forum from being a regular reader and contributor who are making improvements to various pages, and now I am looking forward to it as part of my income through the writing of paid but in accordance with the principles and rules of Wikipedia.

11. I realize that this platform is a place for various peoples in the world to get detailed information about various issues, so its information should be one that carries the truth and a unique weight in the relevant society.

12. I am begging you to forgive me and give me another chance to write on Wikipedia again.

Regards. Jacob Gamaly (talk) 09:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You say "my regular account". Do you have another account, a "non-regular" account? Wikipedia is not necessarily about the truth, it is about what can be verified- see WP:TRUTH. You are admitting to violating the paid editing policy by not declaring your paid editing- at least I don't see where you did. Thanks for your honesty, but you won't be unblocked to further promote your clients. If there's topics that you have no conflict of interest with that you want to edit about, please tell us what those are. After a time of that, we may later permit you to indirectly make COI edits, but not now. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:04, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Replaying for 331dot (talk) First I made it clear, I don't have any other account here other than this one

Second one I have received your response regarding my request, and I continue to emphasize my regret about the mistakes I made.

It is true that I did not make it clear in my article about doing this work for pay, and this is really a mistake based on Wikipedia's procedures, although I realize that ignorance of the law does not exempt someone from a legal sentence, I admit that I did not have a great understanding of these procedures before taking the step to write paid page.

Please, this has taught me and made me from now on to regularly read the procedures here for the wider benefit of this forum, previously I also thought that only the TRUTH is enough but PROOF is also another basic thing to take seriously on Wikipedia.

In fact, my mission is to continue to improve and make this forum better, and it is my belief in these guidelines I got here and corrected by you, has made me a good contributor here for the benefit of others.

I promise in front of you, I have learned and I will work on all the rules and principles of writing on Wikipedia based on FACTS and PROOF without putting personal interests in front until it is necessary to do so.

I am begging you to see my regret and remove this block to me.