User talk:Jackol/Archive 2

Luis Enrique

Luis Enrique info

I added a useful link. And my site is free, without commercials or ads and doesn`t promote anything as you`ve suggested. Have you even looked at the link that I posted? I will take this up further if I see you delete the perfectly good link with original content and 100% on topic, which could be useful to readers. Where exactly is the promotional material? What product is there? It`s a Barca fans community FFS. And completely free of charge (not counting the fool who writes this and pays for server costs just to have a place for English speaking FC Barcelona fans to chat abot their beloved club) Who exactly are you helping here? Sites that are in external links or are you just unaware or unable to identify a useful/perfectly-related-to-subject link.

Please read this page. Specifically: "Wikipedia articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to the subject's official site, if any." Jackol ๏̯͡๏﴿ 09:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you abide the rules so blindly, how come then there`s another FC Barcelona forum in external link?? FCBES to be exact. Oh btw. That link is dead. That must be really useful to people who come to Enrique`s wiki page. I`m putting my link back up and if you insist to act on no grounds whatsoever I will take this up further. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iceman 007 (talk • contribs) 10:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We catch what we can. You could help by getting rid of links that don't stick to the guideline, instead of adding more. Jackol ๏̯͡๏﴿ 14:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Filipovic was one of the main figures in Jasenovac death camp

You have posted to my page that I inserted incorrect information. Perhaps you are not aware, but Filipovic was one of the main butchers in the Jasenovac death camp. He is clearly related to holocaus. Knowing that, you cannot say that I am inserting incorrect info. Pop-cira (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Hmm, you're right. My bad. Jackol ๏̯͡๏﴿ 19:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My editing?

Hi, Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maratha_Empire

That page includes highly inaccurate maps and information. I tried editing it but my edits were all undone. What's the right way of doing it?

Cheers! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.194.255.235 (talk) 19:46, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK I'm losing my patience with this website now. Please explain exactly was wrong with my edit. Nerfari (talk) 21:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would be helpful if you can provide a reference to the information you were adding. Jackol ๏̯͡๏﴿ 21:30, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You mean other than the book? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerfari (talk • contribs) 21:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I seem to have missed the book reference. Jackol ๏̯͡๏﴿ 22:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

This edit by a relatively new user, Nerfari (talk · contribs), seems to me thoroughly constructive: why did you revert it and warn him for vandalism? He is understandably worried because a few minutes before he quite properly blanked a nasty attack page, and Cluebot promptly reverted and warned him - he must be beginning to wish he'd stayed at home. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to Nerfari. Missed the book reference. Jackol ๏̯͡๏﴿ 22:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page blanking and reverting

Hi! I noticed you've reverted a few pages after authors have blanked them. We do have a speedy deletion criterion for this – G7. In cases of copyright violation, it may be preferable to use this CSD rather than revert edits – to a new user (such as the one who created the page Radiolinija UAB), as reverting may come across quite rash (especially if they're not familiar with our policies). Of course, pages such as vandalism or attacks, should retain the original speedy deletion tag (along with a potential courtesy blank) in order for the user to be notified by an admin. Cheers, and keep up the good work patrolling recent edits! Cycle~ (talk) 10:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

how to save Ashoka the great article

hello friend ,thanks for ur toils for wikipedia , friend Ashoka the great article is always corrupted what should we do then?plz do some thing to save this artilce from vandalism. thanks for ur help friend.rajvaddhan 10:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC) user rajvaddhan[reply]

Not much except to keep an eye out! I'll request page protection if the vandalism continues. Jackol ๏̯͡๏﴿ 11:05, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]