User talk:JackW436

Republic of Ireland
	Bratach na hÉireann; Irish tricolour
Use	National flag and ensign
Proportion	1:2
Adopted	1922 (constitutional status; 1937)
Design	A vertical tricolour of green, white and orange

JackW436, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi JackW436! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Donnybrook, County Cork

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Donnybrook, County Cork requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 08:35, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(I am still working on it give me a chance and stop discrimination against me or i will report )

On what basis do you feel you are being discriminated against? In any case, feel free to report away. WP:ANI is the appropriate place to complain. Cabayi (talk) 11:53, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Frankfield,Cork, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Mr X 12:46, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hiya. Couple of quick things.

In this series of edits to the Shandon article, you added an uncited statement that "Shandon Street" is the "main street of Cork's northside". Can you provide a supporting reference for this? Also, I'm not what was intended with the gallery entry, but Wikipedia's gallery and image syntax doesn't support the inclusion of externally hosted images.

In this series of edits to the Douglas article, you removed cited text that had been subject to consensus discussion on the talk page. Can you add a note to the talk page to explain your thoughts on why it shouldn't be included? In the meantime, please take a quick glance at the project's related policies. Including IDONTLIKEIT and IDIDNTHEARTHAT.

If there's anything I can do to help (with syntax, inclusion criteria or project norms), please do feel free to drop me a note.

Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 22:54, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya. Please don't remove cited content or engage in edit-warring. It is not in keeping with project norms to ignore consensus discussions (at least 3 other contributors have advocated a merge of the Donnybrook content to the Douglas article), to ignore requests for engagement (myself and several others have left notes on your talkpage and article talkpages which have not been responded to), and to make changes unilaterally (in conflict with those contributions from others). Please do read WP:EDITWAR, and - as above - please drop a note on my talkpage, the article talkpage, or your own talkpage here. And we can try and address whatever concern it is that you have with that content and approach. Guliolopez (talk) 08:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Donnybrook

Hi - thanks for your edit to Donnybrook. I've amended it slightly so the entry points to an article in which Donnybrook is mentioned (MOS:DAB). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 05:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Douglas Village Shopping Centre

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Douglas Village Shopping Centre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 20:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Donnybrook (2)

I note the other material on this page regarding your edits and the notice immediately above this section. However, in another activity, you edited Donnybrook, a disambiguation page. I reverted the edit and told you in the edit summary and at the "Donnybrook" section above that a disambiguation page entry must refer to an article in which the term appears. The layout of disambiguation pages is set out here Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages and this particular rule is here MOS:DABMENTION. You made 5 edits to Donnybrook the eventual effect of which was, again, to create a Wikipedia:Red link entry (with a punctuation error in it). I have reverted your 5 edits. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 04:23, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blanchardstown

Since you added the statistics and claims in the "Demographics" section, surely you can just tell us where they came from? We can easily help format them as references. The claims are so specific that you must have read them somewhere? Just point us to where, and we'll see if it's an WP:RS that can be included.

I don't know what you were trying to do with the malformed link to a wikipedia page, so I removed that. You can't use wikpedia as a reference - not that what you tried to link was relevant anyway, Blanchardstown isn't mentioned at all there, never mind the comparisons you made in the article. Please read WP:RS (that's a link - just click on it.) Thanks. -- Begoon 09:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Irish section or on white flight RTE — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackW436 (talk • contribs) 09:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - I know what you tried to link. Read what I said again. I think I'm reaching the same conclusions as above - you either don't have the competence to edit here, or you're deliberately making no attempt. -- Begoon 09:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If nobody minds, I'm just going to step in here, because I think I know where the mistake lies. That White flight section mentions Dublin 15, which is Fingal, but if you actually just search "Dublin 15", for some reason, Google provides a map of Blanchardstown Shopping Centre! I think this editor simply saw that and made an assumption.

However, you're right in stating that at no point does that source/article state that it is the least ethnically white place in Ireland, it simply makes an example of an area experiencing a rapid influx of foreign migrants.

Hopefully this helps! Wasechun tashunka^HOWL_TRACK 09:46, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It helps me understand why it was linked, thanks for that. It doesn't lessen the frustrating communication issues much though. If we cannot communicate we cannot function. Obviously it still doesn't support the content, and reading through the whole history here I do see some worrying signs that there's something of an ongoing issue which isn't improving. This kind of thing wastes a lot of volunteer time.

JackW436, can you please answer my initial questions:

(a) Where did you get the statistics (percentages) you added - please link to the source for that.

(b) Where does the statement you added: Blanchardstown has one of the highest percentage of Foreigners in the Country and the Lowest percentage of White Irish come from?

--(If you wrote that statement solely based on that latter, linked section, at White flight, please also read WP:RS, WP:OR and WP:SYNTH, and tell me if you then understand why that's not ok.)--

Thanks. -- Begoon 10:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have collected this data on airo (All-Island Research Observatory) - http://airo.maynoothuniversity.ie/external-content/fingal - and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzNy0F4pwJ8 - — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackW436 (talk • contribs) 12:13, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, for the 'airo' stuff that at least tells us where you got the numbers. Is the only way to do that on that site to pull up each "ethnic/cultural" group population individually for each of the 8 Blanchardstown divisions, and then manually add them together and derive percentages from those totals, or is there a way to get a table showing all the figures at once? Even if manually is the only way it's probably a simple enough calculation that we could use that as a source without it being WP:OR -- Begoon 12:49, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going offline for today - I'll check back here tomorrow. I'd still like to know how you arrived at "Blanchardstown has one of the highest percentage of Foreigners in the Country and the Lowest percentage of White Irish". I didn't watch the whole video but if that's just a quote from a reporter on a YouTube video of a TV news report, I think we'd probably need something better and more reliable before we decided whether such a statement was WP:DUE or not. -- Begoon 13:06, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. While we are waiting for your responses, the material has been removed from the article, per consensus at Talk:Blanchardstown#Demographics section. Take as much time as you need with your clarifications - there is no WP:DEADLINE. If you can describe the calculations you did on the numbers from the 'airo' site, I'll see if I can replicate your results. If you need any other help, just ask. Thanks. -- Begoon 09:57, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Data which I have collected was from http://census.cso.ie/sapmap/, http://airo.maynoothuniversity.ie/external-content/fingal in which I calculated the 8 EDs Together

Shandon street, and others

Hi JackW,You have created many useful pages and have contributed to the Wikipedia community outstandingly ,I strongly Suggest you keep up the good work ,And add important information like which you have added to Douglas,Cork , Shandon,Cork and many other Articles

— Preceding unsigned comment added by JackW436 (talk • contribs) 12:34, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for deliberately misquoting an editor, disruption at ANI, and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GAB^gab 21:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JackW436 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I should be unblocked for which I face heavy criticism for my religious background,in which I didn't appreciate at the time and felt very Angry for Which the Wasechun tashunka quotes Catholics are not the official religion of Ireland and other Insulting Comments which offend me easily,Therefore The Block should be lifted the Investigate whether Wasechun tashunka ,promotes anymore hate in which I will Keep Involved and we will settle this dispute ,In which no Bad comments are Received

Decline reason:

None of this addresses your own conduct, unless you are trying to argue that your religion commands you to misrepresent others and to engage in personal attacks. If you're offended by the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland, I suggest you complain to the Irish people who accepted it in a referendum. Huon (talk) 22:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ANI

You opened the (main) thread yourself, so this is perhaps not required. However, as your misrepresentations have resulted in a reversal of the ANI focus, you should be aware of the ANI (sub) thread - which discusses an issue with which you may be involved. Guliolopez (talk) 09:25, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As you are currently blocked and can not take part in that ANI discussion, if you have any comments you want to make please feel free to post them here and I (or someone else) will be happy to copy them over for you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:27, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I feel I am being attacked by all editor against me and I feel like it is 1 vs 10,But due to this Hatred against me i have nowhere to stand here, (Thanks for your help and support)Boing! said Zebedee
I've copied that over for you, and I'm happy to help in doing that - but it's only fair to tell you that I do not support your recent actions. Oh, and I really don't see any hate from others here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I felt Angry when she stated Catholics are not the official religion of Ireland ,Which is in Fact wrong .Ireland is a Catholic Country. But I shall say that Davey100 should not have a say in this controversial conversation, Due to what the British (Oliver Cromwell )Did to the Irish Catholics but supporting a genocide. I am Trying to Contribute But other editors are always getting in my way.
Do you want that copied to the ANI discussion too? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No its OK it seems some people just don't understand the world

Could you add boarding suburbs to Blanchardstown Dublin which I was in the Process of Adding until I was Blocked

Sorry, but asking others to proxy edit for you while you are blocked is not really allowed. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by JackW436 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

‑ Iridescent 13:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've also extended this block to indefinite, since there's a unanimous consensus that you're either being intentionally disruptive or lack the competence to edit here. ‑ Iridescent 13:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Noting for the record that I've just blocked User:JW436 as a sock. GAB^gab 22:39, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Socks

The socks associated with this account are listed here Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of JackW436. Guliolopez (talk) 19:14, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]