User talk:JackFromWisconsin/Archive 2

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JackFromReedsburg

Thank you for creating Housing in the United States.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for starting this new article, but it feels woefully incomplete. It is a large topic but only has one brief paragraph on how to build a house, then some stats about homelessness. To be honest, the point of this article is tough to pin down.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Friday Jan 15: ONLINE Wikipedia Day NYC

January 15, 6pm: Wikimedia NYC celebrates 20 years of Wikipedia

Wikipedia Day is always a big day for Wikimedia NYC. While we cannot meet in person, we still have something special planned. We will begin the event with the debut of a new video celebrating our community. This will be followed by a panel discussion with some of the people you'll see in the video talking about Wikipedia's 20th anniversary, Wikimedia New York City, and the amazing work they do on Wikimedia projects.

The event will be broadcast live via YouTube. Feel free to ask questions for the panel through the chat!

We will also have some NYC wiki trivia you can participate in, with confectionery prizes.

Friday January 15 ONLINE Wikipedia Day NYC.

6:00pm - 7:00 pm online via Wikimedia NYC on YouTube

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 14:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

February 6th, 11am-1pm E.S.T: Coronavirus in New York City: Translate-A-Thon - ONLINE

You're invited! Coronavirus in New York City: Translate-A-Thon - ONLINE - February 6th, 2021 - Hello User:JackFromReedsburg! You are invited to join the Brooklyn based Sure We Can community for our 3rd NYC COVID-19 themed Wikipedia Edit-a-thon / translate-a-thon - ONLINE - Saturday, Feb 6th, 2021 11am - 1pm. The edit-a-thon is part of Sure We Can's work with NYC Health + Hospitals to stop the spread of Covid-19. We plan to continue to work on translating the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City article into the many languages spoken in New York City; as well as, work on other ideas about how information on wikipedia could slow the spread of Covid-19.

We'd love to hear if you have any ideas. If you can not attend, please feel free to comment on my talk page, or here, or on the event page.

Saturday February 6 Coronavirus in New York City: Translate-A-Thon - ONLINE (optional RSVP on-wiki).

11:00am - 1:00 pm E.S.T online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms available)

--Wil540 art (talk) 21:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 17: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC

February 17, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC

Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

This month will include a discussion of Black WikiHistory Month in February, plans for WikiWomen's History Month in March, and of course the great work that is being done in these topical areas throughout the year. We will also have a relevant demonstration of the Wikipedia:Did you know process. If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or responding to this message.

Wednesday February 17 WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC (optional RSVP on-wiki).

7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 01:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wisconsin dairy industry

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wisconsin dairy industry you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 18:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wisconsin dairy industry you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wisconsin dairy industry for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 18:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wisconsin dairy industry you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wisconsin dairy industry for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:01, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Nice job on your first GA! Quite an interesting topic too (at least to me). Elli (talk \| contribs) 23:50, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Pending Changes Reviewer!

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review of Nuclear power

Hello, just checking if you are still planning to review Nuclear power. It has been over a week since you started the review page, but haven't heard anything since then. If you are not planning to review the article soon, please notify this at WT:GAN so that another user can review it. Thank you! --Ita140188 (talk) 09:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ita140188: my bad, I've been busy this past week and haven't had the time for a review. I'll see if I can do it later today, otherwise I will let someone else do it. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 11:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Response to the withdrawal of the edition of the article "Wikipedia: Link rot"

Dear Mr. JackFromReedsburg,

Thanks for your welcome to Wikipedia.

I am writing in connection with reject my edition of article 'Wikipedia:Link rot'.

I wonder what better archive sites are there than Internet Archive, which:

you can search by typing the url of the page you want to browse free, also at home,
accept multiple archiving requests of any web pages for free,
ensure the long availability of their resources:

theoretically, because that's their mission,
practically because:

they are not a commercial entity, but have (fairly) reliable (and different) sources of funding,
if they are a commercial entity, they plan to donate the files to someone who will keep them for a long time.

If you know such archives, I would be grateful if you could write them all for me.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Yours faithfully,

--Failure9x (talk) 14:39, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Failure9x:, while I do agree that the Internet Archive is a very good archive, it is not the only one. A list is available here: Wikipedia:List of web archives on Wikipedia. Now for your edit, the bullet point right above that lists the major web archiving sites, so I find it redundant to list them again. --JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 14:54, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you for all of your help in reviewing good article nominations! You rock! Chlod (say hi!) 01:16, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the free kittens, but I am not happy that they urinated on my talk page. Could you please clean it up? Thanks, JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 01:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you

		The Good Article Barnstar
		In recognition of writing your first good article and reviewing many others. Your work does not go unnoticed and is much appreciated. All the best, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:54, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of U.S. Bank Center (Milwaukee)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article U.S. Bank Center (Milwaukee) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 06:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article U.S. Bank Center (Milwaukee) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:U.S. Bank Center (Milwaukee) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 07:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article U.S. Bank Center (Milwaukee) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:U.S. Bank Center (Milwaukee) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 10:41, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Corona (beer)

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Corona (beer). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Thank you. — Smjg (talk) 21:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

my bad, while I was removing the overly crufty material, I must have accidently deleted the template. thanks for putting it back JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 03:10, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Your recent editing history at May 10 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 (talk) 15:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddst1: my bad, i was working in the pending changes backlog and wasn't fully aware of your WikiProject's standards (regarding section subheadings). I won't revert again, and apologize for making the mistake. Have a good day and happy editing. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 20:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request help for Quad (company)

Hi there, I'm Tina, a COI editor working for the Sussex-based company Quad. I recently made an edit request to update Quad's Wikipedia page, and was hoping someone with a warm spot for Wisconsin would like to help out with those edits. I would really appreciate it if you could go over to the Talk:Quad page and look over and implement my edit request to the best of your ability. Thanks so much, Tina at Quad (talk) 18:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations \| July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Robert M. La Follette

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Robert M. La Follette you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kncny11 -- Kncny11 (talk) 17:40, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Robert M. La Follette you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Robert M. La Follette for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kncny11 -- Kncny11 (talk) 20:00, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Robert M. La Follette you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Robert M. La Follette for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kncny11 -- Kncny11 (talk) 01:41, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA for Robert M. La Follette

Hi @JackFromWisconsin – Thanks for nominating the article "Robert M. La Follette" for GA. It is pretty solid overall, but I see that you have been busy lately. I would be glad to re-nominate the article for GA. I have already fixed various issues which were mentioned in the previous review. Please let me know if you have and concern. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:31, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Kavyansh.Singh:, feel free to take over the GA nomination. Been busy at work this summer and haven't found time to get on Wikipedia. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 22:04, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A bit late, but now the great "Fighting Bob" is a GA! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:15, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinators and help needed

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

Your GA nomination of Geography of Wisconsin

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Geography of Wisconsin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Trainsandotherthings -- Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Geography of Wisconsin you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Geography of Wisconsin for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Trainsandotherthings -- Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Geography of Wisconsin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Geography of Wisconsin for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Trainsandotherthings -- Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Geography of Wisconsin

Hello! Your submission of Geography of Wisconsin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Great work overall! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ideas for Wisconsin Wikipedia Pages

Hello JackFromWisconsin,

I also happen to hail from the Badger State, and was curious as to what areas related to Wisconsin you enjoyed writing about or researching in particular. I personally would like to write an article about Cycling in Wisconsin as there are articles about biking in other U.S. states and countries, but I don't believe one yet exists for Wisconsin. It's always great to bounce ideas off of others.

Best, Wiscipidier (talk) 19:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Wiscipdier[reply]

Hello Wiscipidier! I have lately been working on general articles on Wisconsin (Geography of Wisconsin and Wisconsin dairy industry), and am now focused on Agriculture in Wisconsin. I do think Cycling in Wisconsin would be a good article to write on the state. Much of it would probably be focused on biking in major cities, and the various bike trails in the state. I really enjoy meeting other Wisconsin editors and being able to collaborate on this big project. --JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 20:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Geography of Wisconsin

On 16 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Geography of Wisconsin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that glaciation in Wisconsin 17 thousand years ago helped create its unique geography? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Geography of Wisconsin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Geography of Wisconsin), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi JackFromWisconsin. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. ~TheresNoTime ^{(to explain!)} 05:52, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

Good article nominations \| January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CurderBurger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CurderBurger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CurderBurger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 00:47, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Radium/GA3

JackFromWisconsin, you opened this review over two months ago, posted a few things to it over a couple of days, and haven't returned in over two months. If you wish to continue your review, please post to it within the next seven days. If you don't, let me know here and I'll look for a new reviewer.

If I haven't heard anything in the next seven days, I'll assume that you no longer intend to pursue the review. Thank you very much for your interest in GA reviewing. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:09, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueMoonset, my apologies, I got busy in real life and couldn't get to Wikipedia for a while. Please look for a new reviewer, as I won't be able to finish it. Thanks for reaching out. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 00:07, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Proglacial lakes of Wisconsin

Hello, JackFromWisconsin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Proglacial lakes of Wisconsin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]