User talk:JaFa 01

Welcome

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, JaFa 01, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! I dream of horses (talk) 01:42, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved of Auckland representative rugby union team

Hi there, I am reverting your move of Auckland representative rugby union team to Auckland Representative Rugby Union Team as it is a violation of Wikipedia:Naming convention (capitalization). The name is a descriptive one, not a proper noun. dramatic (talk) 00:45, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ranfurly Shield in 2009

A tag has been placed on Ranfurly Shield in 2009 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 02:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Style and Neutrality

Hi Jafa, Could you please take the time to familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, particularly regarding Verifiability, Neutral Point of view and Original Research. The style of writing you have been using in articles such as Ranfurly Shield in 2009 and Bay of Plenty Steamers is fine as a blog or sports journalism, but totally out of place in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia's role is to summarise what reliable secondary sources have said about a subject. Anything which is an opinion or interpretation must be presented as the opinion of the person who stated it (e.g. a cited quotation). dramatic (talk) 11:59, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

Hi Jafa, if you disagree with my proposal to merge Bay of Plenty Rugby Union and Bay of Plenty Steamers then please discuss it. Don't just delete the tags. Cheers Mattlore (talk) 02:25, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Finest Shield Game of them All

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Finest Shield Game of them All, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This term is not notable and hardly verifiable, as only one source actually uses this name apparently (Matches Of The Century by Don Cameron). Nothing about this on Google News or Google Books. If one single commentator uses a term to describe one game, it is far from sufficient to use that for an article. Something should be commonly known under that description to have such an article.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 08:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page New Zealand Rugby Union worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 04:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Waikato Rugby Union do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 23:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Tasman Rugby Union. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 23:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Otago Rugby Football Union. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 23:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to 2008 Air New Zealand Cup. Alansohn (talk) 23:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:WAL NZ 07 Nov 09.svg

Thank you for uploading File:WAL NZ 07 Nov 09.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby boxes

I have spent an age going through standardising all the rugbyboxes for these articles and there is no good reason to collapse them. Further, you have been linking every team again, which is discouraged as per WP:OVERLINK. There is not an excess of information and as per virtually every other rugby page, the full rugbybox templates are absolutely fine. The entire point of a rugbybox is to neatly summarise information in a clearly presentable format. By hiding it, you are essentially negating their entire use and function. Please consider your actions before continuing changing these templates. Further, league tables should not be made sortable. They are a document of standings and there is only one suitable way to present them. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:02, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but that is your opinion. Until there is consensus on their use, the standard rugby boxes should be used. They have served us well for the past however many years and do not create any problem with navigation or ease of reading. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:11, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There isn’t one, you would need to start a discussion and wait for input from other editors. Take a look at 2009–10 Heineken Cup pool stage to see the full expanded version used in a season with 72 games. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:14, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I didn’t realise you had started adding scorers to the 1996 article. Good work with that. Perhaps when you complete the article with all the scorers you could make one version with collapsed boxes and one with expanded boxes and then the two versions could be used as a direct comparison for your discussion. Just avoid linking the name of the team each time as it isn’t necessary. Just link the team name once in the table. Then it doesn't need to be linked in the results as it is obvious where a link could be found if a reader needed one. As for scorers, I would link these each time, as it isn't so obvious where else on the page such a link would be. Stadiums and cities ideally should only be linked in their first instance. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:18, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I don't think anyone will see your discussion at 1996 Super 12 season. Try starting one at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rugby union. I'm interested to see what will happen. I'm going to continue formatting the remaining seasons that I haven't done yet as all that would need to be done is add "collapsable" to the rugby box name if we decide that is the way forward. It may take me a day of two to complete. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, and sorry for reverting you straight out last time, I didn't realise you had added the extra detail. I’m actually starting to come around to the collapsed idea, but can’t decide which I prefer. My main concern is that when they are collapsed, there are a lot of rather unsightly horizontal lines running across the screen between each result. Is there any way to avoid this? I think that would make it neater. Also, I don't know whether it will be clear enough that the information is there, or will all the hard work be hidden and only found by a few readers? We'll see what other editors think. Keep up the good work. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:28, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the discussion to the bottom of the page (this is where new discussions should be started – it may be missed at the top) and added my opinion. It may take a week or so to gain consensus on this. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Good work sorting out those lines. I think they look much better now. It’s just whether we want to hide all that work you are putting in adding the scorers. I can see arguments for and against, just can’t decide myself. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:41, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that the "time" field is eliminated from the collapsable boxes. Could you make this something that is displayed when the box is expanded? Nouse4aname (talk) 10:02, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, ignore me, just took a look at the template code and saw it was there! I've got things to do now, but will keep an eye on developments. Cheers. Nouse4aname (talk) 10:05, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, not sure I understand what you mean by excluding them if they can't be "consistent"? Nouse4aname (talk) 10:06, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One thing that is useful is a link to a report of the game, preferably from Super Rugby or a partner broadcaster. This helps with the "referencing" of an article. I realise that for games this long ago, finding a report on the net is virtually impossible, but for more recent seasons I think links to reports are vital. Nouse4aname (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For the times, I think if the information is available we should include it. If it's not then it's not a big deal having some missing gaps. Best to have some of the times than none I think... Nouse4aname (talk) 10:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I assume they are local to the venue. I didn't add them, they were already there when I reformatted the rugbyboxes. Nouse4aname (talk) 10:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I've had a rethink on the table. I think that making it sortable is quite a useful feature and may be interesting for some readers to be able to sort by points scored etc. However, I used the formatting I changed it too before, as I found your version the text was quite small and the table rather wide, and thus not so easy to read. Let me know if you disagree. Nouse4aname (talk) 10:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're right. Good find. Nouse4aname (talk) 11:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Kit right arm blue stripes 96.png

Thank you for uploading File:Kit right arm blue stripes 96.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 04:32, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Kit body 1996 auckland blues.png

Thanks for uploading File:Kit body 1996 auckland blues.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Position of East Cape.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Position of East Cape.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:32, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Super rugby finals system

Template:Super rugby finals system has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 14:02, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1996 super 12 final lineups.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1996 super 12 final lineups.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 15:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kit right arm blue stripes 96.png

The file File:Kit right arm blue stripes 96.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kit body 1996 auckland blues.png

The file File:Kit body 1996 auckland blues.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:Kit left arm blue stripes 96.png

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Super rugby finals

Template:Super rugby finals has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 04:09, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Auckland in the 2009 Air New Zealand Cup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Auckland in the 2009 Air New Zealand Cup, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auckland in the 2009 Air New Zealand Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]