User talk:JFox 0931
JFox 0931, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi JFox 0931! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC) |
Tukohtene Falls moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Tukohtene Falls, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 01:04, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Tukohtene Falls
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Tukohtene Falls requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TartarTorte 01:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- JFox 0931, I removed the CSD tag as you added context to it. TartarTorte 02:22, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Note: It is now proposed for deletion instead. VickKiang (talk) 03:16, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Jacksons Creek (Delaware) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article is a minor creek with no indication of importance from any reliable sources upon a search, and no refs are presented.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VickKiang (talk) 03:15, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Tukohtene Falls has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article is an insignificant, trivial waterfall without any refs and no indication of importance through searches.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VickKiang (talk) 03:17, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Stenkill Falls has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article contains a minor fall with unverified content and no reputable RS to justify notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VickKiang (talk) 04:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]Could you have a look at WP:Notability? It seems that you keep creating articles of questionable significance, with no refs or content that is encyclopedic. Reading this page will help in my opinion, as I will, unfortunately, have to nominate your articles for deletion otherwise. If you have questions, you can consult The Teahouse, where an editor with much more experience than me could help, or possibly discuss whether an article is needed in your WikiProject (if you join one) prior to creation. Many thanks. VickKiang (talk) 04:31, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Bellevue Lake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
A questionably significant article without any refs that is an RS that I can find clearly includes original research that is required for the content.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VickKiang (talk) 04:36, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Kallved Creek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Proposed deletion due to no indication of importance and no RS that could be found.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VickKiang (talk) 04:45, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Boulder Run has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of importance, with no RS on this article that could be found.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VickKiang (talk) 04:49, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Fox Kill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Proposed deletion for trivial article with no RS that indicate its notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VickKiang (talk) 04:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Carcroft Crest Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Proposed deletion- questionably significant article without any RS that indicate notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VickKiang (talk) 04:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 25
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stoney Creek (Delaware River tributary in Delaware), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bellevue State Park. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Boulder Run (Delaware) for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boulder Run (Delaware) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
VickKiang (talk) 21:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Jacksons Creek (Delaware) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacksons Creek (Delaware) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
VickKiang (talk) 00:03, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Tukohtene Falls for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tukohtene Falls until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
VickKiang (talk) 02:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Notices
[edit]Have you received the previous notices? I would suggest you have a look at the previous notability tag, and why your articles are listed for deletion. Many thanks. VickKiang (talk) 03:26, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Bellevue Lake for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bellevue Lake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:26, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
March 2022
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. I also noticed that you created numerous unnecessary articles, they will likely be deleted and will advise that you please refrain, if you continue posting original research, I will issue a sterner warning. VickKiang (talk) 22:05, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Stoney Creek (Delaware). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. VickKiang (talk) 05:35, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
I assure you it is all true if you were to do any research yourself you would find that all the places and things that I have listed are true. There are not many sources on these places because they are small but does that make them insignificant. I know these places exist. It might be good to look at a map. Especially a watersheds and topographic map of the areas. You can also look at to coordinates of where the photographs were takes and you can determine that these places are real. JFox 0931 (talk) 06:31, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
It might be useful to visit these places to find out if they are real I can provide locations and directions the them all if you would like to do some research yourself. JFox 0931 (talk) 06:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
It seems that you may not understand the notability guideline yet, both for creating and editing articles, and we could possibly have a misconception. I certainly believe that your locations are true, but your comments are IMO wrong. If you think your articles are significant then that is likely mistaken (although I am pretty new to AfD, the current responses concur with the insignificance). If you insist on creating those minor, trivial creeks based on the databases and maps that you said that I should look into "the coordinates of where the photographs were taken", do you believe that all of the creeks, parks and other minor geographical locations worldwide should deserve an article? You said that "you know these place exist", which is indubitably true, but your articles always consist of original research that the refs provided do not indicate (unless you could give reliable sources, otherwise I could not conclude on those statements technically). Further, if those are valid, they would not be of interest to readers as it is too detailed. Again, I am not asserting that your editing is deliberately falsifying information, only that it does not adhere to the guideline. I would advise you to have a look at the AfD comments and WP: Notability before starting the next article, or it will still be deleted. A more experienced editor could potentially offer you more thorough advice. Many thanks. VickKiang (talk) 07:34, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Also, the advice that "It might be useful to visit these places" seem impractical to most editors, since if no actual significant coverage could be found on that information except on maps or actually going to those places, then the notability is dubious (i.e., you can find numerous streets on the maps, but should those been always mentioned)? For instance, I could not find extremely intricate information on the course for numerous prominent rivers on the WP article, such as the Amazon one.
Finally, could you explain your subjective opinions on the articles, which could not be neutral (could you provide a source for "small but influential for the wildlife around it" or "It is located in a mostly suburban area but is very clean")? If you have any other questions, you could also post at The Teahouse. Thanks for your time, advice and happy editing! VickKiang (talk) 07:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
I think some people have misconceptions about the nature around them. When I say it is clean I mean it doesn’t have lots of trash and other pollutants visible to the eye. I also like to know about the nature around me. With these articles I am only getting more knowledge out there. I suppose I should take a look at the guidelines but these are the only articles I intend to create and edit at the moment. I was hoping only to get more information out there about these places. JFox 0931 (talk) 00:54, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jacksons Creek (Delaware)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Jacksons Creek (Delaware) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacksons Creek (Delaware). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ––FormalDude talk 21:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jacksons Creek (Delaware)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jacksons Creek (Delaware) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacksons Creek (Delaware). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~StyyxTalk? 22:35, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi this article is small and to someone far away it may seem worthless but to the community around Forwood preserve the more information about it that is out there the better because we are trying to make it a park and by attaching it to Stony Creeks Wikipedia page more people in the area can know about it. It is also important to just get information out there about public places. JFox 0931 (talk) 22:38, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, JFox 0931,
- Since this article was deleted via an Articles for Deletion discussion, any recreation of this article in main space of the project will lead to speedy deletion, CSD G4. I see you have started a draft version and that is the appropriate action to take. The only way I know to overcome an AFD "Delete" decision is to work on a draft version, addresing the problems brought up during the AFD, and submitting it for review to an AFC reviewer to get the draft approved.
- If you have questions about article creation or Wikipedia deletion policies, please bring them to the Teahouse. Good luck! Liz Read! Talk! 00:03, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Please do not create image galleries in article space
[edit]Article space is for encyclopedic articles, not image galleries. If you would like to make image galleries, please put them in your userspace on Commons. Thank you. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:DC4:3CCA:A33F:14A1 (talk) 22:38, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Tukohtene Falls
[edit] Hello, JFox 0931. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tukohtene Falls, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Tukohtene Falls, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 00:54, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Jacksons Creek (Delaware)
[edit] Hello, JFox 0931. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jacksons Creek (Delaware), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Jacksons Creek (Delaware)
[edit]Hello, JFox 0931. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jacksons Creek".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 26 January 2023 (UTC)