User talk:JFL43

January 2019

Hello, I'm Cubbie15fan. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nickelodeon Movies without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cubbie15fan (talk) 20:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cubbie15fan. I noticed that you recently removed content from Are You Afraid of the Dark? without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cubbie15fan (talk) 20:51, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Nickelodeon Movies. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Cubbie15fan (talk) 21:12, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dark Phoenix (film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 21:30, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making positive edits to Are You Afraid of the Dark? and Gemini Man (film). If you have any questions about editing, please let me know. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 17:49, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for evading a previous block and for edit warring while logged out. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:09, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep evading your block to make more disruptive edits, I will indefinitely block you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Disney live-action remakes of animated films. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:13, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:45, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JFL43 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry about those edits, I was just trying to state a fact but I will never do that again if you unblock me.

Decline reason:

Your reasoning here is lacking, as it is unconvincing that you know what is and is not acceptable here. As such, I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. stwalkerster (talk) 23:22, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm going to leave your request for another administrator to review, so that you're given a fair evaluation by an administrator who didn't also block you. Your history of policy violations, as well as your block log, prompted me to set an indefinite block on your account so that you must discuss your behavior with an administrator before being allowed to edit again. You'll need to explain your behavior, how you plan to contribute positively to the encyclopedia, and you'll avoid causing any further issues and violations in the future before you'll be allowed to continue editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:14, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]