User talk:JBazuzi

Wild Fermentation

Yay :) I know the author - haven't read the book yet, though. But eaten quite a few of the recipes! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 06:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I always have a couple things fermenting in my kitchen, thanks to Sandor. I got to meet him last summer when he did a workshop in Seattle.
I see on your talk page that you are writing about Sewanee. Do you know Dr. Fuller? JBazuzi 18:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry - missed your question! No, I haven't met him. Is he teaching there? I graduated in '89 and haven't been back much since about '94. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 01:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More vandalism by User:202.180.87.231

Blocked again for blatant vandalism, hours after the last block expired. Thanks for that. - Alison^☺ 00:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RHF requiescat in pace

I'm so sorry. Our thoughts and prayers are with your family. Thank you for your thoughfulness at such a time. --Thomasmeeks 12:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Health effects of homogenized milk

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Health effects of homogenized milk, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. OccamzRazor 09:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happening edits

I am not sure that Shymalan's character was that notable, even to the point of unseen, as per your edit. Maybe convince me? - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 15:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you suggesting that the character should be removed entirely from the list, because the character had such a minor role in the film? If so, I can see your point, but I think the character's importance is elevated by the fact that he's played by the writer/director, which is part of a Hitchcock-like pattern -- Shyamalan has appeared in every one of his movies. In fact, in this case, it's notable that he _doesn't_ appear on screen, breaking the pattern. However, I don't feel strongly about this either way; if you want to make a change, go for it. — JBazuzi (talk • contribs) 15:19, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adventuress

thanks!!! Murderbike (talk) 21:07, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JBazuzi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of If They Give You Lined Paper, Write Sideways for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article If They Give You Lined Paper, Write Sideways is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/If They Give You Lined Paper, Write Sideways until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 08:32, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]