User talk:JASpencer/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:JASpencer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, JASpencer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
La Luzerne, César-Guillaume listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect La Luzerne, César-Guillaume. Since you had some involvement with the La Luzerne, César-Guillaume redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 01:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Jesus falls the first time
The article Jesus falls the first time has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not independently notable from the Stations of the Cross.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neonchameleon (talk) 13:14, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Newspaperarchive
Seasons Greetings. Following on from your suggestion, on the same day as you I applied for access via wikipedia. Like you I was approved and told to expect an email. I got that email and completed their request for further details. Since then I have been waiting to receive my log-in details. I have chased two different email accounts on this, to no avail. I was wondering if you had encountered similar problems. Graemp (talk) 10:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- Merry Christmas to you too (still three days to go). I've not really been using archives for a while, but I did manage to use this resource. Will check up for you. JASpencer (talk) 18:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
I chased again and finally got access yesterday. Graemp (talk) 08:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Well done. JASpencer (talk) 14:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of The Steamers
The article The Steamers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:32, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from World Trade Organization into History of the World Trade Organization. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:25, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Michael Voris for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Voris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Voris until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 14:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_March_5#Category:Art_of_the_Passion which includes a proposal to rename Category:Art_of_the_Passion. – Fayenatic London 21:57, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Watsi
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Watsi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 10:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Moving content with notes
Hey JASpencer, just a heads up, if you ever need to move content containing notes again (like you did here), you need to include a Notes section near the bottom of the destination page and simpy add {{notelist}} to this new section. Thanks for all your hard work :) Greg (talk) 09:24, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Gib. after Brexit
Can you help with this: Talk:United Kingdom Brexit negotiations#Sources in European language ? Qexigator (talk) 08:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm looking for people who have an interest in this topic. My pastor, for the past two Sundays, has stated in her sermon that the raising of Lazarus was the event that finally led those who wanted Jesus crucified to desire taking action against him. I've never heard this. I need to find out where she got it from, but it's not in the Wikipedia article. If this is true, it should be.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:28, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Saint Gordianus (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:D, there are not multiple people named "Saint Gordianus" covered by Wikipedia.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 20:24, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
On this day, 14 years ago...
|
Hey, JASpencer. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Lepricavark (talk) 02:46, 14 May 2017 (UTC) |
|
Principality and Diocese of Monaco listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Principality and Diocese of Monaco. Since you had some involvement with the Principality and Diocese of Monaco redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 13:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of John Charcol for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Charcol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Charcol until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rayman60 (talk) 16:56, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Anatole de Bengy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Aside from the Catholic Encyclopedia, I can't find any additional sources to indicate that this one particular person was more notable than any of the other 70+ Jesuits also murdered in the same uprising. He is trivially mentioned in a few sources, but mostly as just a name among other names. There is little to no discussion of him as a person.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Anatole de Bengy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anatole de Bengy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anatole de Bengy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:53, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Giovanni Antonio Bianchi
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Giovanni Antonio Bianchi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DrStrauss talk 11:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Blomevenna
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Peter Blomevenna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:33, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Corsica (Journal) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Corsica (Journal). Since you had some involvement with the Corsica (Journal) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, JASpencer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Would you be interested in resurrecting the Sean Gabb article in a way that is policy-compliant? Per this, Gabb probably meets the notability criteria. The article should obviously focus on Candidlist, his curatorship of the Libertarian Alliance, and any novels which have received significant critical attention per WP:AUTHOR. I have neither the time nor the interest to do this myself. L.R. Wormwood (talk) 20:30, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Poverty and Pauperism listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Poverty and Pauperism. Since you had some involvement with the Poverty and Pauperism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:14, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Adrian Davies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrian Davies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Davies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shritwod (talk) 21:40, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Merger discussion for List of Masonic buildings in the United States
An article that you have been involved in editing—List of Masonic buildings in the United States —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Doncram (talk) 16:12, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Catholic Encyclopedia cat Documents
Wikipedia:Catholic Encyclopedia cat Documents, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Catholic Encyclopedia cat Documents and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Catholic Encyclopedia cat Documents during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ƒirefly ( t · c · who? ) 20:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Category:Irregular military in Lebanon has been nominated for discussion
Category:Irregular military in Lebanon, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:32, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Irish border question, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Category:Prayers in the Catholic Church has been nominated for discussion
Category:Prayers in the Catholic Church, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 09:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Gabriel Milland listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gabriel Milland. Since you had some involvement with the Gabriel Milland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 12:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Irish border question, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deputy First Minister (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
School of Cork listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect School of Cork. Since you had some involvement with the School of Cork redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Widefox; talk 12:40, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
The article 2020 group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable group; lacks third party reliable source coverage
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ralbegen (talk) 10:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, JASpencer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Property market listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Property market. Since you had some involvement with the Property market redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hildeoc (talk) 21:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
The article Joint committee (diplomatic) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence that the phrase "joint committee" has any independent existence in this sense.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 15:52, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
In Architecture) Porch (or Vestibule listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect In Architecture) Porch (or Vestibule. Since you had some involvement with the In Architecture) Porch (or Vestibule redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Thryduulf (talk) 11:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
British from the European Union listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect British from the European Union. Since you had some involvement with the British from the European Union redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. B dash (talk) 13:12, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
"Grande Oriente do Brasil" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "Grande Oriente do Brasil". Since you had some involvement with the "Grande Oriente do Brasil" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Wired UK article about Brexit Wikpedia page
Hi JASpencer,
I'm a journalist for Wired UK magazine and I'm writing a piece about the Brexit Wikipedia page. I see that you've been a really active contributor to the entry and would love to talk to you about it. Are you up for being interviewed for the piece?
You can find my email on my Twitter page if so.
Thanks, Matt Mrey445 (talk) 10:04, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northern Ireland Protocol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Protocol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northern Ireland Protocol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vienna Convention (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:18, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Parliamentary Joint committees
A tag has been placed on Category:Parliamentary Joint committees requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Parliamentary joint committees
A tag has been placed on Category:Parliamentary joint committees requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Tax Cut Now Party for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tax Cut Now Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tax Cut Now Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toa Nidhiki05 12:53, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Mary Magdalen, Saint listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mary Magdalen, Saint. Since you had some involvement with the Mary Magdalen, Saint redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 04:54, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Irish backstop contains copyvio from Reuters
On Irish_backstop, Earwig's Copyvio Detector, on September 9, 2019, shows ″Violation Possible 41.9%″.
- https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-negotiator-idUKKCN1PO2IE - 41.9%. So needs to quickly rephrase or article may be deleted (see WP:COPYVIO). I am not admin, just writing there and noticed. Who is interested in the article may try to rephrase while some admin have not deleted it.PoetVeches (talk) 19:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
"Level Playing Field" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Level Playing Field. Since you had some involvement with the Level Playing Field redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 18:59, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Article issues
- Greetings, I have run across several articles at Category:Articles lacking sources from June 2017 like the unsourced 1876 Enniskillen by-election and 1874 Huntingdon by-election (both created by you in 2013) which have become career maintenance listings.
- I did not look to see if you are still active. I saw that at times you deem yourself "to be expert in most everything" but your knowledge is not a substitute for sourcing according to policies and guidelines. These dictionary like stubs might be better merged (or redirected) to a parent (and sourced) article like Enniskillen (UK Parliament constituency) or Huntingdon (UK Parliament constituency).
- While something may be somewhat "notable" in an historical context that does not mean "everything notable needs a stand alone article". Even if there is a source (or a couple) if a subject is already covered in an existing article it can be deemed an unnecessary fork.
- I thought I would engage in some dialog before making a decision if a merge request, redirect, or possible AFD is warranted. Thanks, Otr500 (talk) 11:27, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of History of the Christian Altar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of the Christian Altar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of the Christian Altar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Socialist Action (UK), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon Fletcher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Category:Members of the Parliament of England (pre-1707) for Ipswich has been nominated for discussion
Category:Members of the Parliament of England (pre-1707) for Ipswich, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ミラP 14:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:05, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Inventory of Church Property has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Look, I get that it's in the Catholic Encyclopedia, but this is basically a dictionary definition for "you take an inventory when you take over a church position that someone else had first so you know everything is in order". It's not a technical process that's somehow unique to the Catholic Church. Or any church, really. There aren't any other independent sources that I found that discuss it, so it fails WP:GNG in addition to being a dicdef.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:39, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Inventory of Church Property for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inventory of Church Property is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inventory of Church Property until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Inventory of Church Property, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benedict XIII (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:19th-century religious buildings and structures by decade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
- For the record, see notes on related category and this one at User talk:Fayenatic london#Speedy deletion nomination of Category:21st-century religious buildings and structures by decade
Disambiguation link notification for September 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Middle East Supply Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clearing house.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of HousePriceCrash for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HousePriceCrash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
StarM 19:11, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
"André de Boulanger" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect André de Boulanger. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 5#André de Boulanger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Certes (talk) 15:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
NI protocol article
Just wanted to record my admiration for your work on this article. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Propaganda Due, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radical right.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Maurice Najman
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Maurice Najman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 5a5ha seven (talk) 16:45, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Happy, Happy....
|
|
Hey, JASpencer. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC) |
|
CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:17, 14 May 2021 (UTC)