Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Varun Choudhary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Itsmickeymouse!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Varun Choudhary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thank you for your feedback. I'd like to address the concerns raised about the notability and coverage of Varun Choudhary.
Varun Choudhary is the National President of the National Students' Union of India (NSUI), which is the largest student organization in India and the student wing of the Indian National Congress. This position alone indicates a significant level of notability, as it involves leading a major national organization and participating in high-profile political activities.
I have included multiple references from reputable news sources that provide substantial coverage of Varun Choudhary's activities and his role within the NSUI. These references include:
- Articles about his leadership in the nationwide NEET exam protests, which were covered extensively by major news outlets such as The New Indian Express and Economic Times.
- Coverage of his advocacy in various significant student movements and political protests.
- His official profile on the Indian National Congress website, confirming his position as the National President of NSUI.
For further reference, I have reviewed the Wikipedia articles of previous NSUI Presidents such as Neeraj Kundan and Fairoz Khan. I have ensured that Varun Choudhary's article follows a similar format and provides equivalent levels of verifiable information.
I believe these points demonstrate that Varun Choudhary meets the notability criteria for Wikipedia. If there are any additional guidelines or specific types of references that would strengthen this submission, I would appreciate your guidance.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
I still don't see much improvement. Clearly fails NPOL. And I don't see him passing GNG either. PROMO BLP. I smell UPE.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Varun Choudhary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
I appreciate your feedback. I understand your concerns regarding the notability and independence of the sources.
The NEET paper issue is currently a very significant matter, with NSUI actively protesting across India under Varun Choudhary's leadership. The organization's efforts have been widely covered in the media, as the future of approximately 24 lakh students depends on resolving this issue.
Regarding your UPE comment, I want to clarify that I started working on this article after seeing Varun Choudhary and NSUI prominently featured on TV and in various news outlets for their protests against the government & NTA (National Testing Agency). They have been consistently in the media spotlight due to their advocacy and activism related to the NEET and UGC-NET issues.
I have included references to reputable sources that cover these events in depth to demonstrate Varun Choudhary's notability and significant public impact. If there are additional guidelines or specific types of references that would further strengthen this submission, I would appreciate your guidance.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please include notable sources such as news reports/articles, TV coverage, coverage in books or peer-reviewed journals etc. that talk about the journalist himself (not articles written by him).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aurangzeb Naqshbandi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
