User talk:Itsashaunparty

Welcome!

Hello, Itsashaunparty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

I do need to point out that I've reverted your edits to Jason Gann as they violated a very large number of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, including two very core policies, those of verificatio and nor original research. Information added to Wikipedia must be verified by reliable-source citations, and no personal-knowledge claims are allowed.

In addition, we DO NOT change the dates of tags; the article has been tagged since July 2011 and October 2011, and it is deceptive to change their date to March 2012.

Some of the guidelines we adhere to involve the tone of articles, in which this edit — "Season two of Wilfred garnered the attention of many celebrities including Robin Williams who is signed on as a guest. Production begins in March 2012." — contains puffed-up prose about capturing celebrities' attention, and what Wikipedia calls uncited "crystal-ball" claims about future events.

There is much, much more I could say, and please believe that this message is meant to be supportive. Wikipedia welcomes all responsible editors who wish to help out, and everyone needs to follow policies and guidelines that have been worked out over the course of years. One last point: We don't edit-war over reversions, but discuss issues point by point on the article's talk page. I'd be happy to provide mentorship you there, and help you in any way I can. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 23:44, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've reverted my edits without discussion. Your edits violate several Wikipedia policies and guidelines, especially those regarding biographies of living persons and, I suspect, conflict of interest. If you revert again, I will ask an admin to intervene. He may then block you from editing. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos

My very sincere compliments on a job well-done! In all my years here, I don't know that I've ever seen such a quick transformation from a newcomer to a such a professional-quality contributor. I'm kind of bowled over and very impressed. I urge you to contribute to many more articles — quite seriously, we could use an editor capable of this caliber of work. With great regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 02:58, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NO (Band) (LA).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SummerPhD (talk) 01:41, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NO article

Hi Itsashaunparty. I have fixed your references so that they are in the proper format. I'm sure someone will be along soon to review your article. Have a terrific day. Snowysusan (talk) 23:05, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NO (Band) (LA).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:08, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NO (Band) (LA) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NO (Band) (LA), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, NO (Band) (LA)

Hello Itsashaunparty. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled NO (Band) (LA).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NO (Band) (LA)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:01, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phil Clark (Author, Athletic Footwear Specialist) (January 3)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phil Clark (Author, Athletic Footwear Specialist).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! DGG ( talk ) 06:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jason Gann may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

worker-now-charged-fraud-continuing-wilfred-saga/ | archivedate = 3 April 2014 | deadurl = no}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phil Clark (Author, Athletic Footwear Specialist) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phil Clark (Author, Athletic Footwear Specialist), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phil Clark (Author, Athletic Footwear Specialist)

Hello Itsashaunparty. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Phil Clark (Author, Athletic Footwear Specialist)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phil Clark (Author, Athletic Footwear Specialist)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 06:07, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm Amortias. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Jason Gann, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amortias (T)(C) 20:41, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Itsashaunparty. You have new messages at Amortias's talk page.
Message added 21:12, 30 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Amortias (T)(C) 21:12, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jason Gann may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

web |title='Wilfred' star Jason Gann and wife Alejandra Varela welcome son Xano William |work= [[Zap2it]|last=Nilles|first= Billy|location= [[Los Angeles]], [[California]]|date= 14 August 2013 |

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Gann

Hi, Itsashaunparty. I was one of the first editors to work with you and to compliment you on you rapid transformation into a high-quality editor back in 2012. That's why I hope you believe I'm speaking with you in genuine good faith now. Many of your edits to jason Gann — and I understand you're a fan and that's OK; we all right about subjects we personally like — have been non-neutral. I can see you believe he got a raw deal with the bus driver. But the fact is that he pleaded guilty, so legally, there's no "allegedly" anymore. He's saying he did it. He can't say under oath he did it and then go around saying he was lying and didn't do it, thus committing perjury.

Since there are now two editors who have issues with your edits, could we work together again, as we successfully did before? Could we make edits one at a time instead of wholesale changes? In the spirit of collegiality, --Tenebrae (talk) 20:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow! My bad! Yes, it is not allegedly! Good call! I'm unsure as to what exactly he plead to and what that means (what with plea bargain deals/Aussie stuff) though I will look into it. For the meantime, I am 100% with you that the word "allegedly" does not belong there! Though, in reading this story, not just for Jason, for whom I am a fan, but also for (the population of the US's overcrowded prisons) I do think it's important to point out the actual circumstances.

For real, thank you for the sincere criticism. There's nothing worse than having things changed around for reasons you don't understand.

-itsaashaunparty

Itsashaunparty (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I'm on deadline now, but I'll get to you in a couple of hours to work on this, if that's OK. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:33, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's great. I appreciate it. I'll check in the EST morning. Out of all the reincarnations of Mr. Gann's Wikipedia, besides my mistake on the "allegedly" (and any minor syntax), my last edit was efinitely the most succinct and accurate.

Should I change it in the morning if you haven't gotten to it?

Itsashaunparty (talk) 03:17, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phil Clark (Author, Athletic Footwear Specialist) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phil Clark (Author, Athletic Footwear Specialist), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:44, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phil Clark (Author, Athletic Footwear Specialist)

Hello Itsashaunparty. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Phil Clark (Author, Athletic Footwear Specialist)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phil Clark (Author, Athletic Footwear Specialist)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:00, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ChemNerd (talk) 22:24, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember no personal attacks anywhere on Wikipedia ☆ Bri (talk) 20:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at WP:COIN, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Calling someone an antisemitic, without a direct reference to where they said it, is a blatant personal attack and will not be tolerated. If you cannot provide a link to the exact statement that unambiguously was antisemitic, do not say it. Do not imply it. Playing the race card (or in this case the religious background card) is widely considered a ploy used by those who have no other argument. There is no point where it will ever help your case, either here or in real life. John from Idegon (talk) 20:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you happen to see where he called me a liar?

If not antisemitic, is he just picking on defenseless doctors at random?

This is cyber bullying.

No-one called you a liar. And if you use the term anti-semantic toward a particular editor again, I will personally take measures to bring your conduct up for review regarding a suspension or revocation of your editing privileges. And sign your posts. So am I too now a bully? John from Idegon (talk) 22:21, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And I cannot help but notice you've made no effort to defend yourself against the charges that were levied, but instead simply chose to attack those politely indicating your edits are similar to an editor who is editing for pay. I would suggest, if you can do so honestly, to deny those charges. Works much better than name calling. John from Idegon (talk) 22:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 17:25, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At a certain point, editors that are meatpuppets, doubling down and casting aspersions of antisemitism, become too disruptive and are time sinks. We have confirmed sockpuppets working on this article but you choose to only see what you want to see. We're done. You're a COI meatpuppet and blocked as such.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 17:30, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? It appears you do not appreciate the plight of the modern Jewish woman. No one ever responded to the Nazi claims. John from Idegon writes, "And I cannot help but notice you've made no effort to defend yourself against the charges that were levied..." Well, I've levied charges against a user who has not responded or defended himself. Why? Why has he not responded or defended himself? Might it be because if you look back at his edits you will find a clear antisemitic bias. Please, I urge you to review the articles. Look out for negative sentences. My team and I have reviewed Jytdog and his edits and have levied a charge. Why should he not respond to the charge?

Maybe it's because I'm a woman. A gay Jewish woman. Wikipedia is a place for men, apparently. And you're ganging up on me because I am a Jewish woman. Is that why you're calling me a "meatpuppet." Gross. That's so gross. You people are horrendous. Using the word "meatpuppet" as a negative term.

Are there no limits? I expect a lot of apologies and a healthy donation to a few Jewish charities. itsashaunparty

You seem to have competency issues here. It looks like the first time that you have revealed that you are a woman or that you are gay is in your last post and yet it comes complete with the accusation that this is why things aren't going your way and you are being discriminated against. If we didn't know that then how would it have applied? We really don't care about all that. Martyrdom complex much? The way in which you arrived at the conclusion that editors here are on an antisemitic bent shows that you are either trying a lame straw man tactic or do not have the ability to process logic and determine a reasonable, intelligent deduction. We're not going to go in circles explaining to someone that falls into either category because it is a waste of time.

You and "your team" are now responsible for studying Jytdog's contribs and actually coming up with diffs that would be the supporting proof to your as-yet unsubstantiated accusations of antisemitism. It will be required as an accompaniment to any unblock request that you or "your team" make. Alternately, if you don't have that evidence in hand then you will need to make a retraction.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 18:42, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have revoked the talk page access due to ongoing disruptive use/personal attacks. If you are planning to file an unblock request, please use Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System instead. Alex Shih (talk) 21:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Itsashaunparty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20400 was submitted on Jan 25, 2018 18:24:45. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:24, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]