User talk:Istanbuljohnm

Welcome!

Award

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For your valuable contributions, knowledge, and excellent work on İstanbul-related articles, I award you the Working Man's Barnstar. Tebrikler! —Khoikhoi 03:09, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mersin

I have re-written some sections, but some statements need to be verified. I do not understand why "we need" that forum thread there. They are not considered as "sources" (let alone reliable ones). This aside, from a very brief inspection, it looks like a nationalist board (e.g. use of wolves and other politically charged avatars) but I can not tell for sure, since I do not speak Turkish. I am not implying anything about you, your political ideas and/or character but, if I were you, I would stay away from those places. Kind regards --Zippocar 10:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cebeci Asri cemetery

hello, I know it is not in Istanbul, but I saw your work on Cankaya article, so, please, can you create(or do you know someone who can create) article about Cebeci Asri cemetery? i am not familiar with turkish wikipedians, and you were the first i met in my search. thanks. Elsanaturk 23:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks.Elsanaturk 22:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar time

		Mecidi Order
		I, Makalp award you the Mecidi Order for your efforts to improve Turkey related articles --Must.^T ^C 15:31, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Istanbuljohnm, congrats for your positive contributions/developments in Turkey related articles. let me state my 2cents; please use [[:]] for potentially new articles instead of italik marks. Kolay gelsin.Must.^T ^C 15:31, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

koordinatlar

kordinat bilgilerini bu linkten bulabilirsin.Must.^T ^C 21:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merhaba from Bosnia

Merhaba Istanbuljohnm. I saw your user page, your interests and decided to introduce myself. I come from Bosnia and I would like to write articles about military past of the Balkans, war crimes commited there etc, because I realized that current articles about the subject are not even 1% of the whole perspective. And there are so many edit wars between Serbs, Croats, Bosnians, Albanians and other people from the Balkans which destroyed the point of encyclopedia. Many of them are just here because of their nationalistic sentiment. There are not many Bosnian useres here who surrvived the genocide in 1995, so I will try to fill that gap writing relaible articles well sourced and documented, but unfortunately English is not my mother tongue. I saw you speak English fluently. And I have to admit that I am afraid to make mistakes when I write (alhough I perfectly understand English, I learned it at school). So I came here to ask for help. When I finish some of those articles, could you read some of them to correct grammar mistakes? If you have time of course for that. Feel free to correct me, anytime not just in the articles, but here in talk pages. Best regards. The Dragon of Bosnia 13:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you very much. I will try to provide all sources in English (ICTY judgements about crimes against humanity, genocide and war crimes against Bosniaks that are not presented here - there are hundreds of massacres confirmed by International Courte, which means they are not propaganda, so I will try to write something). The Dragon of Bosnia 16:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ordu - name

you say they got the name from Kotyora..here it says it's from the word "Ordu" meaning army.

http://www.helleniccomserve.com/kotyora.html (from a greek book, i'd imagine greeks would take credit for the name it was from a greek word)

why did you think it's from "kotyora"? --152.216.7.5 13:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. the town was called Kotyora, before it was called Ordu, and Ordu sounds like a simplified pronunciation and spelling of the earlier word. Of course it could be that there was an Ottoman army camp here too giving additional relevance to the new variation also. Istanbuljohnm 00:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar check

Hi Istanbuljohnm. I wrote an article: Foča massacres, so if you have some time, just take a look there, to check if there are some grammar mistakes. Merhaba. The Dragon of Bosnia 23:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

I have a right he is a banned user. --Vonones 15:13, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Banned users are not aloud to edit anywhere on wikipedia even if it is your talkpage. --Vonones 15:22, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sax

Hi, I just saw your edits at Pharoah Sanders and saw that you're from Turkey; I wonder if you happen to know Robert Reigle? He's a jazz tenor sax player and has been living and teaching in Turkey (maybe Ankara?) for the past few years. Badagnani 13:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please read WP:VANDAL. Reverting an article back to the version that was passed on Wikipedia:Featured Article Candidates, as I did with Cameroon, is hardly vandalism. As for your proposed changes, I would be happy to discuss them at Talk:Cameroon. But please don't go about throwing accusations of vandalism willy-nilly. That's a serious charge, and one I am in no way guilty of. Thanks, — Amcaja (talk) 01:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unecyclopedic wording

since ur a native speaker of english, i'll keep this short. i already left a notice to user 88.241.242.61 about his/her use of the word "you". both of u used that word (and its other forms) in the "Didim" article. ur grammer/style is okay, but if u'r familiar with encylopedias, u should know that they're not written in the second person. they're third-person and objective. i made appropriate changes to that article. i just wanted to make sure u dont use "you" in further articles, as is indicated in wiki's "Manual of Style". (i recognize the pseudo-irony of me repeating "u" in this comment). Ivansevil (talk) 00:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

without checking I guess it must nearly a year ago that I wrote the Didim article so you certainly take your time in editing!!! but then if you're analysing every pronoun it's perhaps not surprising. Bravo for your diligence. Keep up the good work Istanbuljohnm (talk) 18:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of people accused by Mohammed Fayed of being involved in the death of Princess Diana

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article List of people accused by Mohammed Fayed of being involved in the death of Princess Diana, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish Armed Forces

Dear Istanbuljohnm, I'm a member of WP:MILHIST trying to do some research on the structure of the Turkish Armed Forces. I've looked through the English webpages but I know the Turkish webpages have much more information available. Would you be able to translate each of the headings on the page http://www.tsk.mil.tr/ so I know where to look further? Kind regards Buckshot06 (talk) 02:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Keletigui Et Ses Tambourinis

A tag has been placed on Keletigui Et Ses Tambourinis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 22:37, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citation in Denizli

Hi Istanbuljohnm, in Denizli you wrote a citation from the Seyahatname of Evliya Celebi. Could you tell me the source where it comes from? Someone translated it to German, but I think translation from Turkish to English to German is a bit problematical. Maybe you have got a link for me. Please answer at de:Benutzer Diskussion:Kpisimon Greetings from german WP and thanks --Kpisimon (talk) 13:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Grupo De La Alegria

A tag has been placed on Grupo De La Alegria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ContinueWithCaution (talk) 02:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ecozone categories

I would recommend you stop adding Australasia categories to Indonesia articles until there is an agreement on suitability. Adding it to many articles won’t actually help your case. --Merbabu (talk) 04:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - to be honest I wasn't targetting Indonesia in any specific way, and I'm certainly mot making any kind of political point, which I'm guessing is your objection to the categorisation. I'm just adding information about flora and fauna to a number of articles about places in the WWF Australasia ecozone [[1]]. Many of these are in Indonesia, but I'll use the Australasia (ecozone) category to group them. Hope you are OK with this Istanbuljohnm (talk) 04:28, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not about politics – and as for your incorrect guess on categorisation, I’ve made my objection plainly obvious – Buru and other islands in the area are not in Australasia. You yourself have acknowledged this. As for Category:Australasia (ecozone) and the article of the same name, there is no verification of this or referencing. Thus, my objection is on incorrect categorisation and no referencing. The solution for both should be removal. --Merbabu (talk) 04:32, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Sometimes some terms in both category and mainspace wikipedia are really problematic - a good example is an editor who might put asia for philipino volcanoes - it is a misuse of categories - as philipino or southeast asia categories are in fact the appropriate usage - and the problem is you are focusing on buru - better in the end to leave the categories alone and find the WP:RS (and if it is easy to do - find more than one as a back up as well)- which really in the end are the far more important item for any additional material - when you step into 'over-arching' larger categories for smaller locations - you are asking or trouble - unless you come across a good WP:RS that verifies and confirms the usage. Please feel free to ask for further confimation of this issue - it may seem at times a perplexing placee - it is (wikipedia that is) Satu Suro 00:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Closure of Sango Wikipedia

There is currently a second proposal for the Closure of Sango Wikipedia (an official language of the Central African Republic). You are encouraged to voice your opinion regarding this matter. --202.36.179.66 (talk) 04:20, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kottarashky

A tag has been placed on Kottarashky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 05:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Kottarashky

I have nominated Kottarashky, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kottarashky. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ttonyb (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Sledgehammer" plot

Dear Istanbuljohnm,

Since you are a Turkish speaker could you please add the interwiki of the article "Sledgehammer" plot which I have created to the respective Turkish Wikipedia article which I am sure alredy exists? I cannot do it since I do not know Turkish. Maybe you would also add some information to this article. Olegwiki (talk) 07:17, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Riverina

In regard to your edit on the Riverina article, do you have a cite for the WWF's classification for the region? Bidgee (talk) 08:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Swan coastal plain

Protected areas of the plain include John Forrest, Gooseberry Hill, Greenmount, Kalamuda and Lesmurdie Falls National Parks all of which are closely bunched together about 22km east of Perth. - plain? - they are all on the Darling Scarp and cannot be considered to be the same as the sand flat (as I call it) - on the plain - they are reserves on the granite and laterite - what you might be considering if you are concerned to show examples of sand plain reserves are:

The articles like the reserves are a very motley crew - but they are on the sand flat - please do not re-insert scarp arts onto the sandplain article!!! Actually the recent lake articles by User:Maias (found in the Swan Coastal Plain category) are by far the best articles yet on the subject to date...

also a closer look at Category:Swan_Coastal_Plain and Protected areas of Western Australia there are probably some reserves I havent mentioned - cheers Satu Suro 14:10, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well - they really are weird and wonderful bunch - and the Perth parks category is one thing, and the recent maias created lakes are another, but a more thorough understanding of the coastal plain residual vegetation reserves is another again and no one has tackled that yet - also if a close inspection of DEC site is made one can find http://www.dec.wa.gov.au/content/view/5317/1556/ and http://www.dec.wa.gov.au/content/view/5753/1755/ and probably the most pertinent is http://www.dec.wa.gov.au/content/category/45/879/1629/ - as most of the remnant bushland sites are not necessarily full blown parks :( Satu Suro 14:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of I See Hawks In L.A.

A tag has been placed on I See Hawks In L.A. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:14, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I See Hawks In L.A.

The article I See Hawks In L.A. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:33, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tirari-Sturt stony desert

Hi Istanbuljohnm, the article looks good but two of the three references are dead links. Could you please have a look and repair this? Thanks, Pgallert (talk) 16:40, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Award

Aak! I awarded you a barnstar for your excellent work on ecoregion articles, but, like an idiot, I placed it on your user page instead of this talk page. Sorry for the mess up! So here it is, on your talk page:

		The Geography Barnstar
		I, 1brettsnyder, award you the Geography Barnstar for creating and improving many articles regarding our beautiful planet's many ecoregions.1brettsnyder (talk) 22:49, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ecoregion infoboxes

Hi Istanbuljohnm. Nice infobox on the Montana Valley and Foothill grasslands page. I left a note about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ecoregions#Infobox. Let us know what you think. Miguel.v (talk) 21:05, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ecology of the Rocky Mountains

I reverted your edit: before your edit, the lede of the article was a summary of the entire article. After, the lede was dramatically shortened and did not cover the article contents. WP:LEAD guides us to the former, not the latter. I'm happy to collaborate with you to improve the lede, but I would like follow to the guidelines. Thanks! —hike395 (talk) 00:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Much better, thanks! —hike395 (talk) 03:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ecoregion map

Hi, I'm working on northern ecoregions and made a number of maps that you will find on this page: Commons:Category:Maps of WWF ecoregions. --Cephas (talk) 23:37, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mississippi Lowland Forests

Hey, I wanted to discuss a couple minor issues on Mississippi lowland forests. The term woodland often carries its own more technical meaning than how it is used in the article. Additionally, I am a little uncomfortable with the terms unspoilt to describe places like Mingo National Wildlife Refuge which has canals running through it. The remaining forested areas are referred to as the "swampiest." Is there an more precise way we could describe this? I appreciate your contributions and look forward to hearing from you. Skinnedmink (talk) 05:31, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Lacey

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Richard Lacey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mtking (talk) 23:52, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Richard Lacey

The article Richard Lacey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:GNG requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", that does not exist, therefore this should be deleted and even fails the Military history WikiProject's notability guide - WP:SOLDIER

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking (talk) 02:39, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Camayenne Sofa

The article Camayenne Sofa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A7 -- no indicia of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 05:59, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Camayenne Sofa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Camayenne Sofa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Epeefleche (talk) 18:18, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalahari acacia-baikiaea woodlands (November 14)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kalahari acacia-baikiaea woodlands.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:32, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Companies listed on the Istanbul Stock Exchange may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

NFIST – Non-Financial Istanbul 20 is the first sector Exchange Traded Fund in Turkey. (

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:15, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Companies listed on the Istanbul Stock Exchange, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goodyear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Companies listed on the Istanbul Stock Exchange, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ittifak. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Companies listed on the Istanbul Stock Exchange may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Çimentaş]] (CMENT and CMBTN ((Çimbeton) - Cement and ready-mixed concrete.
* [[FFK Fon Finansal]] ((FONFK)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:39, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Companies listed on the Istanbul Stock Exchange, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gediz and Mengen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited İzocam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tarsus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

request for help with Turkish sources

Hello, I found you as one of the four active wikipedians listed in the Category:Translators_tr-en, and would like to ask for your kind assistance, if you have a bit of time. I'm working on a biography of a professor in Florida, who is a native of Turkey, and also sometimes a visiting professor there. Trouble being, of course, that I don't speak Turkish myself. The article was in draftspace, but has just recently been moved to mainspace, please see Turhan Nejat Veziroğlu and the talkpage thereof. Thanks, 75.108.94.227 (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey)

Hi. I was wondering if you'd be interested in setting up Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey), based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). Now it's not a contest in itself, it's designed to motivate people to inspire others to improve content and build something which demonstrates the hard work going into the country which is visible. The focus is more on quality improvements but new articles are welcome too. Eventually a Turkish National Contest could be created to fuel it, like Wikipedia:Awaken the Dragon, in which contestants can choose to keep the Amazon vouchers themselves to buy their own books for more articles or put them into book fund to help editors further improve Turkish-related topics by giving them the books they want. It will begin though as purely an improvement drive. If interested, or you think anybody else might be interested, alert them and sign up on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Turkey talk page at the bottom. Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Istanbuljohnm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Neighbourhoods of Güzelyurt

Template:Neighbourhoods of Güzelyurt has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Altınyunus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Altınyunus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altınyunus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. evrifaessa ❯❯❯ talk 09:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Faruk Çelik

The article Faruk Çelik has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:43, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adese

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adese requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ahmetlii (talk) 08:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carolina Shout moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carolina Shout, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 07:47, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolina Shout has been accepted

Carolina Shout, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Clear friend a ^💬 15:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Aksaray towns and villages

Template:Aksaray towns and villages has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:14, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ağaçören towns and villages

Template:Ağaçören towns and villages has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:14, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Eskil towns and villages

Template:Eskil towns and villages has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:14, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gülağaç towns and villages

Template:Gülağaç towns and villages has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:14, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ortaköy (Aksaray) towns and villages

Template:Ortaköy (Aksaray) towns and villages has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sarıyahşi towns and villages

Template:Sarıyahşi towns and villages has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kütahya Porselen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kütahya Porselen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kütahya Porselen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dirubii Olchoglu (talk) 08:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fatma Salman Kotan

The article Fatma Salman Kotan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]