User talk:Israelscitech

This is Israelscitech's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Israelscitech, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Russell Berrie Nanotechnology Institute (RBNI), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Borkificator (talk) 09:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Russell Berrie Nanotechnology Institute (RBNI)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Russell Berrie Nanotechnology Institute (RBNI) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Borkificator (talk) 09:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Israelscitech (talk) 08:33, 9 May 2019 (UTC)It appears that the text of Asher Space Research Institute was actually copied from the original Wikipedia article, not the other way around. Israel is a non-English speaking country and organizations often avoid PR investments by lifting texts from existing sources.[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Asher Space Research Institute (ASRI)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Asher Space Research Institute (ASRI) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Borkificator (talk) 10:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Israelscitech. You have new messages at Talk:Russell_Berrie_Nanotechnology_Institute_(RBNI).
Message added 10:16, 10 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Status and Advice

As for the Institute, I reviewed the article, adjusted it to our format, and moved it to Russell Berrie Nanotechnology Institute

It would help to have references providing substantial coverage from outside 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. Remember not to copy from a web site -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. Some of the material in the article therefore still needs to be rewritten--it will be easier to rewrite it than to license it, but if you do want to license it, follow the rules just linked to above. . Keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of press releases or web sites, which are usually more expansive.

We need a photo of the institute for the article, not of the director (I'm going to try to write an article on him and use the photo there) . Remember to use the proper licensing.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of the organization wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know. If you think you can do it right according to our guidelines, do so, but expect the article to be carefully checked for objectivity.

But see our rules about Conflict of Interest. As they say, even with Conflict of Interest you may edit, provided you do so objectively. It is not advised, because experience shows that a person will have great difficulty writing an objective article about themselves. As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of the organization wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know. If you think you can do it right according to the guidelines, do so, but expect the article to be carefully checked for objectivity.

Therefore, you must choose another username. As explained in WP:USER, only individuals may edit. When you use a name that is or includes the namer of your organization, you imply that you are editing officially, and have a superior right to edit the page. But that is not the way WP works--all editors are considered equal--and your contributions like those of any editor must be justified by sources. I'm sure you did not intend to give such impression, but that's why we have the rule.Therefore, please choose another name. On that user page, you should say whom you are working for.

Hope this helps. DGG ( talk ) 21:05, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Israelscitech/Peretz Lavie has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peretz Lavie, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 16:46, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lokey Center for Life Science & Engineering.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! DGG ( talk ) 19:28, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cornell NYC Tech

Hi mate! Cornell NYC Tech is looking much better I think. The references need work but there are stacks and stacks from reputable sources, so we should be able to do away with the non-RS ones. I'll be away for a few hours but feel free to continue the work. Just watch the pro-Israel bias. I know it's tempting to swing back the other way (given how biased the article was to begin with) but we need to stick to WP:NPOV, yeah? No need to go into detail about Israel, the institute, diplomatic efforts (unless they directly relate) and other nonsense. Just focus on the subject at hand. Cheers, Stalwart111 07:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I was shocked at how the article was, and used my field of expertise (Israel science and technology) to try and move it to a more objective place. However, the correct presentation of Cornell NYC Tech should involve and expert on cornell/NYC/US academia. The involvement of Technion in Cornell NYC Tech is not represented correctly and proportionately as the article stands right now. The Technion Cornell Innovation Institute is a small part of the greater venture, and could even have its own page as its focus is specific to advance research (when it finally begins to exist on the ground!)

Thanks

Israelscitech (talk) 07:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Israelscitech[reply]

No, that's probably right - it needs more work. I think it's probably just a matter of getting involvement from a few good copy-editors generally, rather than trying to find a subject area expert. A few good editors with a solid understanding of sourcing and verifiability would be a good start. When I get some time I'll insert some of the good sources I've found. Hopefully that will balance the involvement of various groups/institutes. That's all a matter of giving appropriate weight to sources.Stalwart 111 07:48, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've added it to some WikiProjects which means it should get some more attention. Stalwart111 07:55, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! You're great :-)

It will also develop as Cornell NYC kicks into action - with breakthroughs, patents etc. It is good and right that it has a wikispace. I will be following it from the backseat though, as the claims against Technion were untrue and pitifully misinformed - as well as in a large part irrelevant to the article. It would be more appropriate for NYACT to make a page about itself (if the organization is notable enough). Israelscitech (talk) 08:15, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Israelscitech[reply]

Ha ha, thanks. Yeah, there is an extent to which it will expand organically - all good. I've left a note for the editors at WP:WikiProject Cornell University asking for some input as well. Stalwart111 08:25, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I live and learn! The topic also involves NYC and Mayor Bloomberg. I don't know if they have a similar wikiproject? Israelscitech (talk) 08:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Israelscitech[reply]

Yeah, there's WP:WikiProject New York City too - it has also been added. Stalwart111 08:46, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lokey Center for Life Science & Engineering concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lokey Center for Life Science & Engineering, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:48, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lokey Center for Life Science & Engineering

Hello Israelscitech. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Lokey Center for Life Science & Engineering".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lokey Center for Life Science & Engineering}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Science and Nonduality Conference (SAND)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Science and Nonduality Conference (SAND) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cotton2 (talk) 19:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! Please delete (I couldn't figure out how). I made a mistake, but now have written the article in the Sandbox and submitted it for review. I misunderstood the process and published thinking it was a creative space. 84.109.49.213 (talk) 19:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Science and Nonduality Conference has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Science and Nonduality Conference. Thanks! Varun FEB2003 ^{I am Online} 13:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Science and Nonduality Conference (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

needs at least a lede. Also reads like an advertisement

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Science and Nonduality Conference and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 02:48, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Israelscitech, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 02:48, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Israelscitech. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Science and Nonduality Conference

Hello, Israelscitech. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Science and Nonduality Conference".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TheDragonFire (talk) 15:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]