User talk:Isolated Wanderer

WELCOME! Please bear with me while I figure out how all of this works. Thanks! Isolated Wanderer (talk) 19:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Hi, you messaged me asking whether you could discuss certain things about Sylhet with me. I am not currently in Bangladesh at the moment so am unable to meet up with you. What kind of things did you want to ask me about? UserNumber (talk) 19:49, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Glad that you could make time for the chat. I have been reading into the Mughals and their subsequent conquests of Bengal including their wars with the Afghans and Baro-Bhuiyans. So I stumbled upon your contribution to the article of Khwaja Usman on Wikipedia. You have about 29 references in that page. I wanted to read some of the books in those references but I cannot seem to find them. So of them are actually very rare. Hence, I wanted to ask if you have those hard copies and if I could borrow them from you? Also, I wanted to know about the Mughal Faujdars who were stationed in Sylhet Division (Sylhet, Moulvibazar, Habiganj, and Sunamganj) from 1612-1900 after the defeat of Khwaja Usman.Isolated Wanderer (talk) 20:26, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Unfortunately I don't have the full versions of most of these books. I have mostly been using previews on the Google Books website by typing keywords (for example: https://www.google.com/search?safe=strict&biw=1600&bih=757&tbm=bks&sxsrf=ACYBGNR3MR8AafVN59wJAlP4NlOmZkhOrg%3A1579037082734&ei=mjEeXsfELKqD8gKBwpH4AQ&q=%22khwaja+usman%22+bengal&oq=%22khwaja+usman%22+bengal&gs_l=psy-ab.3...7645.8818.0.9036.7.7.0.0.0.0.95.462.7.7.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.OYdxvD3ZG2c). However, you can access some of these books online such as "The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, 1204–1760" - one book which I have been reading fortunately. Here is the link for the Baharistan-i-Ghaibi which also mentions the Mughal opponents in Bengal: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.84864

I have a list of all successive rulers of Sylhet on my sandbox. A lot of these have been transcribed from Bengali script so using both scripts for research may also help. There are numerous spellings of certain names as well such as for Khwaja Usman, Uthman, Osman, Othman etc. as well as in Bengali. I have an interest in the history of Sylhet as well as the erstwhile Baro-Bhuiyans across Bengal. You are indeed correct, these books are very rare and I would also love to have the full copies. They seem to be unavailable in major libraries in the United Kingdom. May I ask what books you have been reading relating to these fields? UserNumber (talk) 21:25, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to apologise to you for such delayed response. I am sorry. I have been very preoccupied at work. Well, I usually read articles from different pages in this field. But I started off with the Travels of Ibn Batuta which contained information about Hazrat Shahjalal (R) and his conquest of Sylhet. Hence I have been intrigued about the history of Sylhet largely. I have just started reading Ain I Akbari by Abul Fazal which is available online. I have also started looking for reliable sources to learn about Sylhet and Baro Bhuiyans. I have also checked your sandbox. I see you have mentioned Yusuf Khan (1707), Motiullah Khan (1707-1708), Rahmat Khan (1709), Kartalab Khan Bijapuri, and Yusuf Beg Khan (1712-13). But I see no references there. Could you guide me towards your references for these? Isolated Wanderer (talk) 17:18, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering what happened to you haha. I thought I put you off by saying that I mostly rely on samples. Sorry for the late reply, I wasn't tagged in your edit so I didn't get a notification but I returned to this page and I've seen that you have replied. I am starting to read a lot of Mughal works which are available online; currently reading Baharistan-i-Ghaibi and Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri, which contain a lot of information about Sylhet which I am adding along to Wikipedia. I have future plans on reading "The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, 1204-1760" by Eaton. However, as I have said, a lot of the work is heavily relied upon by samples from Google Books. The late faujdars of the 18th-19th century can be found in A chronology of Muslim faujdars of Sylhet (full version) and "Sylhet: History and Heritage". Bengali book samples have a lot of information: "Sileter Mati, Sileter Manush" by Fazlur Rahman and of course the books of Syed Murtaza Ali and Achyut Charan Chowdhury. UserNumber (talk) 22:32, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Az24saat.org (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Az24saat.org and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Az24saat.org, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zoozaz1 talk 03:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Isolated Wanderer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Zoozaz1 talk 03:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Az24saat.org

Hello, Isolated Wanderer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Az24saat.org, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Rick and Morty: Ever After

Hello, Isolated Wanderer,

Thank you for creating Rick and Morty: Ever After.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi, and thank you for creating this article. From the looks of it this is your 2nd new article, so welcome to Wikipedia. I tagged a few areas for improvement because this article just barely meets the guidelines for notability. Although there are 9 sources on the article, only 2 (CBR and Syfy Wire) satisfy all the elements of WP:GNG, or Wikipedia's rule of thumb for whether or topic is notable for an article. I would encourage you to read over these guidelines, but as always we are happy to help either on the article talk page, or over at the teahouse. If you plan to continue working on this article, you might find some inspiration from a similar article: Head-Space. Thanks again and Welcome!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Babegriev}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bgv. (talk) 21:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Babegriev! Thanks for informing me. I am still new to this and trying to comprehend all guidelines while making meaningful contribution. I have expanded the article as per your suggestions. Take a look and let me know. Thanks. Isolated Wanderer (talk) 04:27, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 24saat.org for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 24saat.org is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24saat.org until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bgv. (talk) 22:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]