User talk:Islandbaygardener

Welcome

Welcome To Wikipedia! Hello, Islandbaygardener, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay and make constructive edits. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and have a great time being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, I will always be willing to help or you can ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alexander Smith Cochran

A tag has been placed on Alexander Smith Cochran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 06:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Ernest Shufflebottom"

A page you created, Ernest Shufflebottom, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

No indication of importance/significance. An article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you Loren.wilton (talk) 09:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Visiting card. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. It appears that you may be using Wikipedia to promote Te Papa. Please refrain from adding links that do not actually provide any meaningful insight into the article topic. Bdb484 (talk) 14:08, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resignation

Resignation: I joined Wikipedia with the highest of hopes and the best of intentions. I thought to myself "Hey - here's a way to contribute to the greater good". I'm eclectic in my interests and so I thought that the best idea to keep me interested would be to go through the Te Papa's collections and see what connections I could get. You have to start somewhere right? I've put some significant time into learning the ways of Wikipedia but now I give up... My first article on Alexander Smith Cochran was speedily deleted a minute after I put it up. I didn't even get a chance to say - "hey stop I'll work on it". So I learned to use my user page for early drafts and I rewrote it. I speedily learned how to block speedy deletion proposals when my article on Ernest Shufflebottom got nominated. But just recently I've been told I'm "promoting Te Papa". Well I'm over Wikipedia - all this community seems to do is make me feel bad that I'm not doing it right. Why am I am wasting my time? I'm off to spend my spare time on something more constructive.islandbaygardener (talk) 10:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to see you go. You've done some good work here.-gadfium 22:45, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UnResignation

UnResignation:Thanks for your kind thoughts Gadfium. I appreciate it. Hopefully you'll be pleased to know that I'm back in the Wikipedia fold. I've popped back occasionally in the past 10 months but this time I'm serious. I'm ready to get over myself, reply to any future critics with "if you don't like it, edit it and fix it!" and I'm back on the band wagon. Once again I've chosen to use Te Papa's website and collections as inspiration for articles and I will be including links back to original sources where I find them. islandbaygardener (talk) 05:37, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Back

And thank you for the article on Oldman. Chartinael (talk) 08:17, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article

I've just read your article Invercauld (ship) and thought what a an interesting story this is - who might the author be? Well, I'm also glad that you've unresigned. Welcome back!

I see you use your user page to draft articles. That's one way of avoiding deletion hassles, but there's an even better way, and that is to set up a subpage for a new article. That way, you can work on more than one article at a time, which is often useful as articles might inter-relate to one another. I have some 30 articles on the go and as I'm doing research on one, I come across info on others and can readily deposit that.

So if you let me know what you would want to call the article that you are working on, I can show you how to set this up so that it's on its own subpage. You can reply here. Schwede 66 18:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Wow! Thanks Chartinael and Schwede I'm starting to feel a bit like Sally Fields at the Oscars... That's three people in a row that have been nice to me... I'd love to know how to set up subpages... I'm doing working through sub-antarctic island ship wrecks so my next bit of work is going to be on General Grant (ship) - will try and add info Derry Castle (barque) - will try and add info /Compadre (ship) - new article /Spirit of the Dawn (ship) - new article /Anjou (ship) - new article Dundonald (ship) - will try and add info /President Félix Fauré (ship) - new article islandbaygardener (talk) 05:59, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I've set you up for subpages on your user page. If you go into edit mode, you can see what I've done:

The star at the beginning of each line creates bullet points,
The new articles are as per your page names, but they have a leading forward slash. When you click on the redlinks to start those articles, they will be created as subpages to your user page. So the first one will, for the time being, have a name of User:Islandbaygardener/Compadre_(ship).
When the article is ready, you can move it into what is called articlespace. Easy to do - will show you later.

By the way, the convention is to have ship names in italics in the article - you achieve that by putting two apostrophes around the words you want to italicise. And when you look at this text, the colon at the beginning of each line achieves the indentation. If you were to reply, you would use two colons, so that the text is indented even further - that keeps the different contributions apart from one another.

Wikipedia has got to be fun - don't worry about the setbacks! There's always help at hand. Schwede 66 07:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'Ie toga article

Talofa! Excellent you created the 'ie toga, very important in Samoa. I've tried to expand it a bit. If you feel like dropping in at Wikipedia:WikiProject Samoa, it sure needs some help. There's another editor User:Dr. Blofeld who is cool and experienced and helps out now and then. Have a nice day! Teine Savaii (talk) 00:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles I'm working on

Hello Islandbaygardener. In case you haven't seen it, I had set up the above on your user page for you. Schwede 66 21:30, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Duh! Now I get it... islandbaygardener (talk) 22:19, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1907 Sub-Antarctic Islands Scientific Expedition

On July 5, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1907 Sub-Antarctic Islands Scientific Expedition, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some tips

Hello, if you wish, I could give you some tips that may come handy when producing new articles. Here's a couple of things:

When you have an article ready, you create a new article in the mainspace area by copying and pasting. What's easier is to move the article. On you toolbar, you have a little down arrow. Put your cursor over it and you should see a dialogue box showing 'move'. Left click on it. In the next window, you have an interface where you can give an article a new name (that process is called 'moving'). Simply delete your user name and the forward slash, put a little note into the comment box (e.g. "article ready for publication") and confirm. Done!
It's great to see that you use inline citations. When you use a reference more than once in an article, what you do is you fill out the 'Ref name' field. Simply give the reference some name by which you will recognise it. When it comes to using that reference again, click on the little clip board in your toolbar that is to the right of 'Named refs'. You will now get a list of references that you have already defined with a name in the article. Choose the one you wish to use. Done.

If you are unsure about other things, just drop a question here or on my talk page - I'm happy to help. Schwede 66 07:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Schwede I really value your positive support and help and I'll try your tips out... I'm going to keep trying to learn new skills every time I'm in here. I've kind of given up thinking I'll be able to create the most perfect article in the world though. After I've spent hours getting the information together in what is hopefully a concise and readable article I'm really happy for others to look over it for my mistakes.

Thanks for telling me about how to do multiple references. I tried to figure that out and got completely lost. I'll try again using your instructions. 07:46, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Mahiole

THanks for your input - it could do with some help and the NZ link should be stronger. Cheers Victuallers (talk) 07:53, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand

You may have noticed that I added a short piece of text to the talk page for Tales from Te Papa, Talk:Tales from Te Papa. This is just a notice that the page in question falls within Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand. With that in place, the project get notified about events related to the page (proposed deletion being the most common). It's also used by some tools for things like picking the correct english variant for spelling. I would encourage you to add page you create to appropriate WikiProjects. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:06, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments Stuartyeates. I'm hesitant to engage with WikiProjects as I feel that this may lead to more interaction with other Wikipedians. While the majority of people contributing to this site are delightful and helpful, sometimes I find the tone of communications to be too critical and confrontational for me. I'm happy that others like you are building on my work and bringing pages into the fold of various WikiProjects. I'll think about what you have said and I might give it a try but, if I'm honest, I think this might be a step too far from my comfort zone with Wikipedia. islandbaygardener (talk) 21:34, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you've had negative interactions with some of our co-editors. In the medium/long term, however, there is no way of avoiding the consensus nature of wikipedia. I would encourage you to push in this direction as fast as your comfort levels permit. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:27, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again

We meet again. We suddenly have interest from Derby Museums in your article on Ashby Potters' Guild. The "Wright Challenge" has thrown this up as an article we can QR code from Derby's room and their curator found your article. Fancy giving it a dust? I see there is a picture of Mr Ault and NZ has some of the pots if you could get a free pic. Cheers Victuallers (talk) 17:07, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Victuallers, I've had a look at the article and given it a bit of a polish with as much information as I can find online. I've tried to find better information on the appearances at Expos but haven't managed to trace any scanned copies of catalogues or such yet. I also can't find any freely-licensed images of Ashby Potters' Guild works. Te Papa owns copyright in the images they hold and I know they have a commercial picture library so that's out. Also the one image in Flickr that I can find has a copyright status of all rights reserved so no luck there either.islandbaygardener (talk) 04:35, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Use of italics in ship name

Hello, Islandbaygardener. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests#Use of italics in ship name.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I moved your post to the bottom of the page. -- John of Reading (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Answer for for future reference: Use of Italics in title of Ship Article islandbaygardener (talk) 01:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Humphrey Ikin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Humphrey Ikin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humphrey Ikin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Command and Conquer Expert! ^{speak to me...}_{review me...} 04:54, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred Henry Burton

Hi Islandbaygardener, good to see that you are still producing articles (or shall I say again?). I've spotted a problem with close paraphrasing in one of your early works on the Alfred Henry Burton article. Have a look at the article's talk page. I'm sure that you can get that fixed up in no time these days. Keep up your good work. Schwede 66 20:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for taking part remotely in the #NZspecies Edit-a-thon and helping us create much-needed species articles. It was great to have you as part of the team. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 01:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Islandbaygardener. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Islandbaygardener. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Minerva (1864) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minerva (1864) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minerva (1864) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 😎HellaswagdabXD😎emoji😎^Talk 18:00, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]