User talk:Isdgaf

Welcome

Hello Isdgaf and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! MikeM2011 (talk) 00:50, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Queer anarchism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Queer anarchism was changed by Isdgaf (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879568 on 2015-01-31T21:46:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Widr (talk) 22:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Angelo Casillas

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Angelo Casillas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tgeairn (talk) 21:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Angelo Casillas. Tgeairn (talk) 00:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for creating inappropriate articles and using multiple accounts to do so. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 02:50, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Isdgaf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel I should be unblocked for multiple reasons * The reason I made multiple accounts is because it said I couldn't use my account to defend this wiki page. * The reason I kept "spamming" this page is because this person exists, he may not be known nationally, but he is a local legend. Especially to those of the Suffolk community. * The last reason that I should be unbanned is that I simply wanted to give this man credit where credit is do. Isdgaf (talk) 03:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

None of those are reasons to unblock you; indeed, they are all essentially good reasons for which you should remain blocked. Kinu ^t/_c 05:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You absolutely could use this account to defend the wiki page: you should have explained, on the talk page, how he's notable, what reliable sources have written about him, and generally how he's a notable person. —C.Fred (talk) 03:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

C. Fred

I'm truly sorry if I have disconcerted you, but I am very new to this and I am confused on how to use this formatting and program.