User talk:Ipodnano05/Archive 2

More information for The Climb (song)

Hey, Liquidluck. I found some info about the climb on an interview with Peter Chelsom but I'm not really sure how to add it to the article. Here is the the link. Could you see? It serves as a more to add for "Hoedown Throwdown", Hannah Montana: The Movie, and the soundtrack. And there is also another source for "The Climb". Also, our conversations have been all over the place so let's keep it in your talk page. Just contact me by leaving the Template:Talkback on my talkpage. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job finding these! The second source is alright; it's from MSNBC and published by Voxant. I'm still checking the reliability of the first one. Also, do you mind if we keep our conversations on your page instead? I copied your first message above. Liquidluck (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do you have the source for the acoustic radio tour? I couldn't find one, so I marked it with a citation needed template. Liquidluck (talk) 01:57, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The acoustic radio tour is a video in Hollywood Records' official YouTube. I don't think it needs a source since it is broadcast. Plus, tours don't usually have references. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 02:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Since it is controlled by the actual label, I think it merits inclusion as a source. I'll go ahead and add it. Liquidluck (talk) 02:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Liquidluck, I found over 23 different videos that could help us with all of this in here. They're really good sources, published MSN. It's going to help us a lot with different things. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, nice! A lot of those look like interviews, which will be really helpful. I was kind of nervous about doing the HM:TM film article, but it looks like it's getting easier. Liquidluck (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I was skeptical too. But I know as we explore music we will find more and more. Plus, this will be a learning experience for me. I have no idea how to do a film article; I've only done music until now. It'll be good stepping out from my comfort zone. Same reason why I offered to do the video game. Plus, I want to make Mean Girls a Featured Article someday. I plan on doing it just after I make Miley Cyrus discography a Featured List and the songs from the first Hannah Montana soundtrack Good Articles. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 03:28, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article nomination for The Climb (song)

Hey, I've been observing your efforts from my watchlist earlier and just wanted to say you guys are doing a good job. Is therre anything in my review so far that you're not sure about or not happy with? If you want me, just leave {{tb|Liquidluck|More information for The Climb (song)}} on my talk page! Regards, HJMitchell You rang? 02:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HJ Mitchell, can you respond to my comment in the third bullet for "Live performances"? -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 02:21, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One moment. HJMitchell You rang? 02:34, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a look at that sentence and essentially reworked the flow of the paragraph so it all fits together and each sentence leads into the next. You might want to have a quick look, just to make sure it makes sense. HJMitchell You rang? 02:49, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added the word "latter" in one of the last sentences to specify which performance it was that had her in an escalator and etc. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 03:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, can you respond to my comment for the second bullet point in "Background and release"? -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 03:07, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, hang on 2 secs and I'll take a look. Btw, with the talkback temps, if you use {{tb|Ipodnano05|Good Article nomination for The Climb (song)}} it takes the recipient straight to this section. HJMitchell You rang? 03:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose that'll have to do if we don't have any names. It's just one of those things- you can't have everything, I suppose. It's not overly relevant anyway, it just would have been interesting. HJMitchell You rang? 03:20, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. So what about the dates of when things were found? -- 03:22, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Well if we don't know to whom it was offered, we're unlikely to find out when. However, it would be good to know when Peter Chelsom got hold of it- I wouldn't fail a Good Article nom over it, but if you're looking to take it to FA... HJMitchell You rang? 03:28, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, we're definitely hoping for Featured Article nomination and very much appreciate your thorough review. We're still finding more details for the development of the song, so... is it a pass? Because I think we addressed all the issues that were brought up. And again thank you for the thorough review, it was really helpful. Plus, I think we're passing the article through a peer review before nominating it for Featured Article. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 04:02, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome- it's easier than I thought and if you're going to do it, you might as well make a thorough job of it. I'm just going to check the refs, it's last on my list but I can't honestly see anything that would fail it. I'll let you know when I'm done but I shouldn't be more than an hour. HJMitchell You rang? 04:15, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 04:24, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's official! Congratulations, The Climb (song) is now a Good Article. All that remains for me to say is that I wish you the very best of luck with a future peer review and FA bid! It's been a pleasure working with the two of you. HJMitchell You rang? 05:22, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much and it was a pleasure for me too. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 05:24, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA

Hi! I was just browsing through WP:GAN looking for something to do and noticed you have a few outstanding noms. I enjoyed working with you last time so, if you fancy working together again, just drop me a line and let me know which one you want reviewed first. I have a few things on at the minute, but nothing so challenging I couldn't spare you a few hours for a GA review! Best regards, HJMitchell You rang? 20:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my god, thank you. I would prefer for Hannah Montana: The Movie (soundtrack) to be reviewed but that's obviously what you meant by "challenging" so would Ready, Set, Don't Go be O.K.? That one was just me. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 22:45, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's you, I'll have a look at it. Out of interest, how many did you nominate? HJMitchell You rang? 22:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you... Lol, with "The Climb" I nominated 6 articles. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 22:56, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're most welcome. I thought I saw your name a few times on the list! I've officially opened the review but it'll be tomorrow morning (UTC/GMT) before I can give you any useful feedback so I'll drop you a line then! All the best, HJMitchell You rang? 01:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Just stopping by to tell you that I've made my comments on the review page. Nothing major, mostly just dotting "I"s and crossing "T"s. Btw, User:EnDaLeCoMpLeX has been active in correcting some of the issues, so you should have even less work to do. Don't hesitate to drop me a line any time if you need anything. HJMitchell You rang? 17:54, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on the GA review page! HJMitchell You rang? 01:15, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Congratulations again!!!. Ready, Set, Don't Go is now a GA. Thanks for making my job easier by preparing it to such a good standard. If the rest of your noms don't get any attention by Monday, come and bug me and I'll do another one. Regards, HJMitchell You rang? 03:01, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YAFYWBH

Hey! I've been looking for info on YALFYWBH, and I found this. Do you have any idea about what the Miley sessions are? I thought there was something like it for AOL, but this is Yahoo... Liqudluck•talk 04:04, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I wasn't sure if it had that. Well, the Miley Sessions are not live they are just basically promotional music videos. I added it to Let's GEt Crazy and it's GA. P.S. how do people get those designs for their usernames? -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 04:07, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go to your preferences (there's a link at the top right, next to watchlist), scroll down to "signature" and check the box for "sign my name exactly as shown". Then, type in a signature using html/wikipedia markup and click save. It'll be used whenever you sign. The code for my signature is [[User:Liquidluck|Liqudluck]]•[[User talk:Liquidluck|talk]]. Everyone's code shows up on the edit page. Hope that helps! Liqudluck•talk 04:18, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it. For the article only critical reception and some lyrical content is there. Is there anything? -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 04:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You don't get how to change the signature, or you don't get something about the article? I've been looking for critical reception, but I haven't found any. Ugh. I don't get why reviewers won't comment on this song! It's the last number, after all. Still looking. Liqudluck•talk 04:49, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lol... for real (about the song). It's the first on the album and the last on the movie, worth mentioning something. I don't get the signature thing. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 04:52, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added your talk page to my watchlist, so you don't need to leave talkback templates for me anymore unless you want to. For the signature,

Go to special:preferences
Scroll down to the second block. It says signature and has a white box to type in. Beneath the white box is a box to check next to "sign my name exactly as shown".
Check the box.
In the white text box, copy and paste this (as an example): [[User:Ipodnano05|Ipodnano05]]([[User talk:Ipodnano05|talk]]) (It'll show up as Ipodnano05(talk) )
It won't show up on my preferences page, so it might not show up on yours either. After you save, type ~~~~ on your userpage, sandbox, or my talk (it won't look right on your talk, since the "talk" link will be bold) in order to test your signature.
Play around with the code as you like. Font face is the font of the text, and color is the color of the text. I guessed you like blue from your userpage, so I put that, but you can put any color you want. There's a list of color names here that you can use instead. You can also use hex codes (put color="09F" instead of color="LightSkyBlue"). You can use any hex code or color name, you're not limited to just the ones on those lists.

Let me know if you have any trouble! Liqudluck•talk 05:24, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I get it now, and yeah blue is my favorite color. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 05:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How do you put words in bold? -- Ipodnano05(talk 05:39, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use regular wikipedia bolding- I.E., '''text''' Liqudluck•talk 05:48, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I figured it out... this is my new signature. BTW, any luck on the article? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 06:08, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. I think I'll go to sleep and look again tomorrow. Cool signature! Liqudluck✽talk 06:30, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 06:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Miley Cyrus audio samples

Yes. TehRandomPerson^talk 04:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YAFYWBH and The Climb

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Taylor Swift - Crazier

No problem. TehRandomPerson^talk 04:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HM:TM

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File:Billy Ray Cyrus - Back to Tennessee music video.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Billy Ray Cyrus - Back to Tennessee music video.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 05:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Back to Tennessee

File:Billy Ray Cyrus - Back to Tennessee.ogg
I think you can put the file onto the article yourself this time :) TehRandomPerson^talk 01:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Back

Wow, you were amazingly fast with Back to Tennessee! I'm sorry I couldn't be active and help with that one and the others for the last few days - I had a really important research paper due for a really hard teacher, so I forced myself to be less active and to stay off completely the last few days and work on it (I haven't slept for the last two nights ;) ). But I'm back now, and the reviews I was doing are pretty much done (those are so time consuming, I don't think I'll be very active there) so I'll be active again! Is the article still at User:Ipodnano05/HT:TM? I think the crit reception for The Climb looks good, and I tried to copy edit it, but I could only find two really tiny errors. I hope the PR helps. Liqudluck✽talk 05:25, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, I thought it must have been school, lol. Anyways, yeah the movie article is there. I need you for that one because I have never done a film article. Let's start. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 16:30, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ipodnano05/HT:TM

I'm working on the casting section. Do you think you can rewrite the plot section? I copy and pasted the old one, but I think it might be better to just start over. The song names should be in parenthesis, but they shouldn't be bolded. The entire summary should be about 700 words, the shorter the better.Liqudluck✽talk 00:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. I'll get started on it soon, with midterms coming up I won't be logged in as often. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 02:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HM3 Karaoke.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HM3 Karaoke.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:25, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

EW

I thought it might tickle you to know that Entertainment Weekly very likely used the info you found for The Climb in this article. If you click on "songwriter Jessi Alexander actually shopped it around to several other country artists first.", which is pretty much a paraphrase of what you wrote, you get to the Voxant video that you found ;]. Liqudluck✽talk 03:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gasp! Maybe People did to- although maybe not. They linked the voxant source, but nothing in the article looks very similar to The Climb article so they might have found it themselves. Liqudluck✽talk 03:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was gone for a few days beacuse I was on a trip to Atlanta. I see that The Climb has gone under several changes. For the cover version of The X Factor winner, I don't know if it should have its own infobox or its own section. Please tell me how you would put it. Also, I see that the song was pulled from it's Grammy Nomination :( Please reply. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 20:44, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Hope you had fun in Atlanta! I hear the aquarium there is amazing, did you go? I don't think we'll be able to hold back the flood of X-Factor fans if we take out the infobox now that the single's been released. Before the winner was even announced, I removed infoboxes for it twice before I gave up. So far, the main body hasn't been vandalized very much, and I think we could get a semi protect if we asked (although the tide of edits/vandalism calmed down today). I think the main problem is that there will be a lot of editing with the release, it'll be on the charts for a while, and FAs are supposed to be stable. I think we should let the X-Factor fans keep the infobox and move it to a new article as soon as it charts- but the FA reviewers might think its better to keep them together. I added the info about the Grammy release to The Climb (song)#Awards and nominations, do you think it's okay? Liqudluck✽talk 23:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I did have lots of fun, I couldn't go to the aquarium though - I wanted to but didn't get to it between shopping, the World of Coca-Cola, Underground and other stuff. I revamped the topic and put it in cover versions. Check it and make any corrections. You are completely right about the FA nomination. It's going to have to be held back for a while - until the cover goes down in charts. About the Grammy, I was a little confused when I first saw it beacuse I was like 'didn't she write it for other country artists'. Also, I wanted to know what your favorite music/tv/movie genres and entertainers were. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess the interest in the article really did slow down- the infobox hasn't been readded! Too bad the FA has to wait, it was so close. My favorite music genres are pop, alt. rock, and indie and my favorite movie genre is comedy (I'm absolutely terrible with horror movies). I don't know what my favorite tv shows are, I watch a lot of different ones like Saturday Night Live, Scrubs, Gossip Girl, and Disney Channel shows. I think the weirdest show I watch is Arthur. I loved it when I was little, and now I watch it with my little sister. What about you? Liqudluck✽talk 03:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, yea I saw. My favorite music genres are pop, rock, alt. country, hip-hop, R&B. I really go all over the place. With pop im usually inclined to pop rock. It takes me a long while to get used to songs in more urban genres. I really like Guns n Roses with rock - my faves are "Sweet Child O' Mine", "Welcome to the Jungle", and "Knockin' on Heavens Door". As far as I go with country would be Rascal Flatts - sometimes it's a little too country like in "Backwards". I like Taylor Swift and Carrie Underwood very much. I like a lot of variety, part of the reason why Miley is my favorite (she has a lot variety). With movies I am the same as you are. With horror movies I'll die and have to sleep with my parents. I just don't get the point of them, to watch people die?? For TV I like What I Like About You, Wizards of Waverly Place, The Nanny, George Lopez, and mainly comedy though I like some like CSI and Medium (I bet you don't know this one, my aunt told me about it and I loved it). You would expect me to LOVE Hannah Montana, but lately it isn't as good - the third season was really good at the beginning and now its not. Cain't wait for the fourth season, they say they are making new characters and settings. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 04:04, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MileyCyrusKaraokeCover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MileyCyrusKaraokeCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:02, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HM2KaraokeCover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HM2KaraokeCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:02, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hm-tm karaoke.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hm-tm karaoke.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:05, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Let's get crazy musicvideo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Let's get crazy musicvideo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:29, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fly on the Wall music video.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fly on the Wall music video.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Party in the U.S.A. music video.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Party in the U.S.A. music video.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joe McElderry The Climb sample

File:Joe McElderry - The Climb.ogg
Finished. TehRandomPerson^talk 01:37, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New messages

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hannah Montana: The Movie (soundtrack) GAN

Hannah Montana: The Movie (soundtrack) has been placed on hold for one week. If you fix the issues I have addressed by then, it will be listed as a good article. Chase wc ⁹¹ 10:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I addressed everything but the last comment on "Music and lyrics". Please see what I wrote. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 19:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

7 things

I was wondering if you've come across any links that would be useful for composition- especially if they mention her saying "sha" over and over. Also, does she count her band in on the album? I know she does for the music video, but I'm not sure if I should mention it if she doesn't on the album. Liqudluck✽talk 00:56, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea, but Paste's comparison to 10 Things is pretty interesting. I'm going to search for "sha". -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 02:01, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind about the "sha", the musicnotes supports it, but any other composition stuff would be awesome. And yeah, I adored that. Have you seen the 10 things movie? Liqudluck✽talk 02:06, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. I was listening to the album and it doesn't have her counting, that's only the video. Also, for the chord progression - it's not visible in music notes. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 02:09, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks. We should add that to the music vid, then- the BBC guy was obsessed with it. Liqudluck✽talk 02:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I already have that she counts from 1 to 4. I don't know how you want to address it. The review's pretty funny. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 02:24, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, I missed that. Yeah, that pic...! Liqudluck✽talk 02:36, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lol - for reallll. The size of his nipple is bigger than Miley's head. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 02:37, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Liquid, I think the accusations about Nick Jonas should be in a new section between live performances and track listings, since most of them touch on her wearing his medical necklace in the video and putting that before the music video would be kind of weird. I think there were a lot of people commenting on this so the section can be bulked. Also I found this image, I don't if it is copyrighted. And about the background section, it's very messy due to that long quote. The events are not organized in sequence. I'd think it'd probably be best if we'd take about half of the quote and make it a paragraph. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 18:11, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think having a Nick section is a good idea. Having an entire section devoted to rumors would make the article seem WP:TABLOID-y. I don't think there's a problem referencing material discussed later in the article. For example, in the music video we can simply say she wears a diabetes necklace, but in the background we can actually say why it is significant.

I don't think the pic is really free, but it says there's OTRS information coming, so if it's still there in a week, it can be added. Really nice pic, too!

Yeah, we should just write the quote into prose- more than half of it is quoted, which is more than needed. Liqudluck✽talk 20:08, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. I put the info about Nick Jonas to background. Should I split the quote or are you going to do that? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 20:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can, unless you want me to. Liqudluck✽talk 20:21, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't know how to. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 20:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can try. Liqudluck✽talk 20:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 20:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lol, me too - I don't think it really matters since it's a cover. And hopefully nobody randomlly decides to cover 7 thinngs. WE could also do Breakout. If do See You Again next - then we will have done all the singles except just stand up and party in the usa. I think this one could be FA - her top tens could all be FAs (see you again, 7 things, the climb, party in the usa). So I wanted to talk to you about Taylor Swift, I've been listening to her songs and am obsessed with them - especially Jump Then Fall and Forever & Always - I see you like Fifteen - I think maybe we could address both of them. It's kind of how Legolas does both Madonna and Lady Gaga. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 20:02, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas to you too! That tree is beautiful, and thank you very much for the message! Taylor Swift articles would be awesome, and I can make most of the samples for those articles myself since I have both of her albums. I think my favorite by her is Untouchable, it's so pretty. Liqudluck✽talk 21:54, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome. That's cool so we can get on that soon after "See You Again" or Breakout. I'm going to buy the platinum edition of Fearless soon. I don't know about Taylor Swift; I really like "Our Song" but cannot stand "Teardrops of My Guitar". I'm probably just going to buy the songs I like on iTunes. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:58, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can work on See You Again directly in the namespace, since it is basically a stub but most of the info is cited. Yeah, I like Fearless much better, although I can understand why traditional country music people dislike it. It's very poppy. Liqudluck✽talk 22:16, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. about "See You Again". Should we have the Rock Mafia remix cover as an alternate cover or completely remove it? Fearless was really Taylor's breakthrough, she got 8 Grammy nominations. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:18, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to ask you that. I think we should just remove it, have a separate section for the remix but no infobox. Liqudluck✽talk 22:47, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should just add the remix to background because then the charts and everything would be split.ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:49, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They should be split though, shouldn't they? They aren't the same song, so combining would be like combining the charts for Whatcha Say and Hide and Seek. Liqudluck✽talk 23:39, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know - I don't think so because it's only a remix (not based on new vocals or anything). Or maybe we could have a section for it, but not describing anything but the release and the difference between the original and that way we could leave everything else where it's supposed to be. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:55, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds reasonable. As a side note, you might want to watch your wording in this comment, since we don't own the article. Liqudluck✽talk 02:28, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, we reached an agreement - if only we could do that for "The Climb". Thank you for catching that. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 04:20, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, yes. Darn out-of-the-blue X-Factor cover. :P Liqudluck✽talk 04:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For real :) Hopefully nobody decides to cover any of Miley's and Taylor's songs and release as a single. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 04:23, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk-back

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at HJ Mitchell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Christmas

Thanks for the wonderful message on Christmas, wish you the same too. How ws it for you? For me it ws too mcuh of Turkey and goose, ahhhhh got my stomach upset :( 11:19, 27 December 2009 (UTC) --Legolas ^(talk2me) 11:20, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome... it was great we had everything that's typical of Venezuela (where I was born). -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 20:40, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the new year wish, I'll weigh in on Breakout a little later. As for discographies, there is no concrete licensed discography for Japan, however for Ireland you can use the Hung Medien website. Search for the artist and click on the discography tab. It will take you to a list of all the singles and albums released by that artist and the highest cahrting positions. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:47, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!! I checked on irish-charts and nothing is there but I know it charted since I went to the official pages and got something for singles. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 03:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just wait a few days, Hung Medien takes time to update. As for Japan its better to remove it, that's what I do for FLC's. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See You Again

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re:Breakout

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at HJ Mitchell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I've reverted the talk page back to the version before the review (hope you don't mind me reverting your edits) to keep things intact (rather than relisting it at GAN) and changed the template to page=2 which I've created so, if I might suggest adding Talk:Breakout (Miley Cyrus song)/GA2 to your watchlist? I've opened it and I'll be back at a more sociable hour to do the review! Hope this helps. HJMitchell You rang? 02:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It does... thank you so much! -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 02:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! I've made a few points on the review page that need addressing, but there are no fundamental issues. Let me know if you need anything clarified or there's something you take issue with. Other than that, I've got it watchlisted and I'll take a look at the improvements when it lights up! All the best, HJMitchell You rang? 01:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Surely I will. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 01:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift discography

Your edits were in no such way discussed. You just went in and did it w/o discussing. I, too, am willing to compromise. However, the page needs to be how it was before your edits took place, that way things will go smoother. Also, I agreed with you on the talk page that the lead you provided was fine, as well as citation formatting. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 21:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As much as I hate to say it, I do kinda agree with you. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 21:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 21:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would actually like to have a third person's point of view, first of all. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 21:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose I could do that lol. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 22:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As am I, my good friend =D EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 22:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did see them. I'm about to respond back to them. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 22:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell? We should revert the discography to the VERY ORIGINAL version, not your version.Langdon (talk) 22:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I will keep reverting it. It should be in the very original version before changes, and it should be you who bring up these discussions. Langdon (talk) 23:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why should I not revert? You are the one who makes drastic changes without discussion. But now you want us to duscuss with you. Things have become wierd. also almost all countries follows the style in Carrie Underwood discography, an FL. Langdon (talk) 23:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are threatening me. I don't even need to revert. probably you need to report yourself first. Langdon (talk) 00:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at HJ Mitchell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Another reply on my talk page. FWIW my talk page is always open if you want a chat or you can email me. HJMitchell You rang? 23:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Our Song (song) a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You've earned it!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For tirelessly improving articles on Miley Cyrus songs and working to get them to GA status, providing me with consistently high quality articles to review, I, HJ Mitchell, award you this. HJMitchell You rang? 19:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my god!! Thank you!! This is my first banstar and I'm glad it could come form you. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know it was your first! Like I say, you've earned it! I like reviewing GAs, but it's nice to get ones like yours that I don't have to spend a month on! WP's coverage of country music and Miley Cyrus is better for your efforts and it would be a shame to let that go unrecognised! Where are you going next? Taylor Swift's discography or another Miley song? Have you got any more waiting for review? HJMitchell You rang? 03:01, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much. After everything in Taylor Swift discography is resolved I will nominate for FL and I'm going to do a Miley Cyrus discography as soon as some of my major points are discussed on the talk page in order to avoid what happened on Taylor Swift discography. Currently I'm waiting for about 4 review but I can see that you're reviewing Crazier. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 20:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. I saw your sig and it was relatively near the top so I thought I'd add it to my to-do list. Besides, I like Taylor Swift! Give me a few hours and I'll get round to reviewing it for you! I need to clear my to-do list a bit (finish a copyedit on a future FAC firstly! I was asked to do it ages ago.) but I expect when I've done that, I'll review the others you have waiting if they haven't been done! GAN could really do with some more reviewers. Have you seen the queue lately? HJMitchell You rang? 20:34, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I'll save you the hassle of {{talkback}}s and stick your talk page on my watchlist! HJMitchell You rang? 20:35, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's pretty cool and I know what you mean. I even decided to do my first review. Thankfully Legolas is reviewing about 4 or more. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 20:38, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Talk:Crazier/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

7 Things

Will get to the review today. In the meantime can you take a look at this. Comment on what are your thoughts about how I edit and the article "Paparazzi". Be frank, if you think what I do is crap, say it. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 11:44, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift discography

Hi, I've just issued a warning to someone for edit warring on Taylor Swift discography. I would advise you to take a day or two away from it (or just stick to the talk page) and resist the urge to revert again because I would really hate to have to take this to WP:ANEW, but it's heading in that direction. On a happier note, I saw your comment on Crazier's review- if you can find anything to verify some of the information in the section, that would be great (it doesn't have to be in English- that's what Google translator's for!). Do drop me a lineif you need a hand or email me (linked on the editnotice to my talk page) if you feel the need to rant. All the best, HJMitchell You rang? 23:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Time of Our Lives Miley Cyrus UK.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The Time of Our Lives Miley Cyrus UK.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Chase (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Butterfly Fly Away/GA1

Hi, I've offered a review and placed the nomination on hold while you deal with a few issues I have raised. Feel free to drop me a line on my talk page with any questions/when you have resolved the issues. J Milburn (talk) 01:59, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miley Cyrus and Billy Ray Cyrus in the AOL Sessions.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miley Cyrus and Billy Ray Cyrus in the AOL Sessions.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TS EPs

Sorry, I don't own either of them. I'll try to stop by my library today to see if they own them. Liquidluck✽talk 17:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I'm fixing stuff from the 7 Things review right now, and I see from above that Butterfly Fly Away is getting reviewed. Do you know if there are others open? Liquidluck✽talk 22:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, Crazier's been open for a while. Do you want to finish that review while I do 7 Things? Liquidluck✽talk 22:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ipod! I just finished the 7 Things review, I updated your FTs and GTs page with YAFYWBH's pass (hope you don't mind!), and I'll do Butterfly Fly Away tonight. Also, User:Mephiston999 (talk · contribs) helped with the YAFYWBH's pass and single-handedly took care of the Beautiful Eyes GAN. Liquidluck✽talk 04:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift sounds fun =]. I might not be huge, but I'll definitely work on it! Liquidluck✽talk 04:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and my library doesn't have the EPs, but it does have both albums- but they're both on massive hold lists. I could request them and supposedly get them if need be, just not this month ;]. I also have the digital copies, and while those don't have personnel, I can make as many samples as you want! Liquidluck✽talk 04:24, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have the platinum edition of Fearless, the CD. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:15, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, then :) Liquidluck✽talk 01:35, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ipod! You can use the 3 step process to nominate them for AFD. Which ones are you concerned about? Liquidluck✽talk 01:33, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please add your input at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs#Singles release date is when FIRST being SOLD as a Single, NOT Radio Airplay

Hello, I think you may be interested in joining the discussion HERE. Thank You.—Iknow23 (talk) 11:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crazier

My apologies for not getting back to you sooner- I must have missed your last comment on the review page. Anyway, congratulations and good work on digging up that reference, Crazier (Taylor Swift song) is now a GA! I'm never far away, so feel free to drop me a line if you want me! Best, HJ Mitchell | fancy a chat? 23:43, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Last Song (soundtrack)

Oops, twinkle notified you since you were the first contributor, but you weren't the real article creator. Deleted the notice. =] Liquidluck✽talk 23:34, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift

Hi! So, I've been procrastinating on music and lyrics because I honestly don't know what to write. It seems like the things that are included in that section in other album articles are already covered in the development section. Do you have any ideas? Liquidluck✽talk 06:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The development section has stuff on how she wrote it. It doesn't have the instrumentation of the songs, the genres, or the lyrics. As far as instrumentation goes you cant find a lot on the About.com reference - some songs have banjo, guitar, and more. The genres is ultimately divided into two: the traditional country and the modern country. As for the lyrics, I should probably remove the reference to Drew so you can talk about that and many songs, including the singles, have not been described lyrically. I also advice using Musicnotes.com for the instrumentation and other things. Have you already checked out the album from you library because I think we need the studios that she recorded in for the infobox. And I have been searching through biography articles and I think we should start on the Miley Cyrus article in User:Ipodnano05/Sandbox. Any of the big changes we'll discuss on the talk page of the actual article in order to avoid what happened on Taylor Swift discography, which truly makes me sad. Most of my hard work is really gone. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 16:37, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miley Cyrus - When I Look at You cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miley Cyrus - When I Look at You cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Liquidluck✽talk 15:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You'll Always Find Your Way Back Home#music video

The first video released for "You'll Always Find Your Way Back Home" was from The Miley Sessions. The second video uses the excerpt from Hannah Montana: The Movie. In the music video section of "You'll Always Find Your Way Back Home" you put the movie excerpt first as if it was the first video released for the song. People whe read this article will think that the Hannah Montana: The Movie exceprt came before The Miley Sessions version. The Miley Sessions video release: March 2009 Hannah Montana: The Movie video release: August 2009 from Dbunkley6....talk. —Preceding undated comment added 18:35, 24 February 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Can you

Lend some support at the FA nomination of Give It 2 Me? --Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ipodnano05. You have new messages at Liquidluck's talk page.
Message added 18:52, 13 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

liquidluck✽talk 18:52, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift disco FLC

Commented there and addressed you issues at "Give It 2 Me" FAR. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:35, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 04:37, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So if you fell that comments are addressed, can you strike it to support? :) --Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift discography RIANZ

I disagree with the recent changes you made to Taylor Swift discography regarding removing the New Zealand certiications, the RIANZ is reputable & I don't think that being a smaller market is enough reason for removal. Please consider. Nowyouseeme - Tà£k 13:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I made the edit to comply with comments from the article's FL candidature. Talk to Legolas about it. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift album

I don't think you properly looked through all of my changes. It's fine if you want to keep some of the information in there, but there are a lot of unnecessary things included in the article that aren't specific to the album or (at least as I see it) necessary to the lead. e.g. The page contains an artist background, which doesn't seem appropriate to the album page since it is also located in the artist page; most well done album pages that I've seen don't include this type of information. The lead also contains information about Taylor Swift's individual awards, e.g. Grammy Award for Best New Artist, but fails to link this information to anything pertaining the album. I think, as an artist award, this information should be located in the artist page unless the connection between the album and the award is made clear. It discusses her music as a blend between country and pop, but the genre listed for her is country pop -- which I feel makes such a long sentence redundant. Also, IMO, NPOV is at risk through the use of certain verbs that don't procure neutral connotations, i.e. "spun." This is an encyclopedia, not a press release.

If you want to discuss what information you feel should be kept in the lead and what should not, I think that is a more appropriate and productive discussion. I don't think you need to discuss her search a producer in the lead, for instance; I feel that it would suffice to say *in the lead* that it was produced by Nathan Chapman. The rest of the article provides that detail and depth. Assembled (talk) 19:27, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift discography FLC

heya, noticed that you were having some problems with chartstats and just thought i'd give you a hand, and you can use these for future discogs too :) these were given to me by somebody else a while ago. for positions up to 2006 use the this book > Roberts, David (2006). British Hit Singles & Albums (19th ed.). London: Guinness World Records Limited. ISBN 1-904994-10-5. for after 2006 you can use ChartsPlus, find the chart entry date from chartstats/everyhit etc and go to here and find the issue number for the particular article and format like this > "The Official UK Singles Chart for the week ending January 14, 2007". ChartsPlus (282). Milton Keynes: IQ Ware Ltd: 3. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help) hope these are helpful to you :) Mister sparky (talk) 15:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Miley project

Hey, I was just browsing your userpage (it's still on my watchlist) and noticed you proposal for the Miley Cyrus Wikiproject. I think it's a brilliant idea and I've offered my support. I just wondered if you'd thought of spamming article talk pages or regular editors in the area? I only ask because I have a surprising number of Miley-related articles on my watchlist and this is the first I've heard of it. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:05, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thank you. I probably should. I'll start with her article and some others with high traffic right away. Thank you. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 17:58, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to be of service. I think you'll find a fair bit of support for it, it's just a case of finding the people who would be interested. If you can be bothered, you could try contacting the most prolific editors of some of the articles, but certainly a note on her talk page should attract a few people, since there are quite a few talk page stalkers and other interested people there. Have fun! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:19, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More information for The Climb (song)

Good Article nomination for The Climb (song)

GA

YAFYWBH

Re: Miley Cyrus audio samples

YAFYWBH and The Climb

Taylor Swift - Crazier

HM:TM

File:Billy Ray Cyrus - Back to Tennessee music video.jpg listed for deletion

Re: Back to Tennessee

Back

User:Ipodnano05/HT:TM

Orphaned non-free image File:HM3 Karaoke.jpg

EW

Orphaned non-free image File:MileyCyrusKaraokeCover.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:HM2KaraokeCover.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:Hm-tm karaoke.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:Let's get crazy musicvideo.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:Fly on the Wall music video.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:Party in the U.S.A. music video.jpg

Joe McElderry The Climb sample

New messages

Hannah Montana: The Movie (soundtrack) GAN

7 things

Next

Talk-back

Christmas

See You Again

Re:Breakout

Taylor Swift discography

January 2010

Talkback

You've earned it!

7 Things

Taylor Swift discography

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Time of Our Lives Miley Cyrus UK.jpg

Talk:Butterfly Fly Away/GA1

Orphaned non-free image File:Miley Cyrus and Billy Ray Cyrus in the AOL Sessions.JPG

TS EPs

Please add your input at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs#Singles release date is when FIRST being SOLD as a Single, NOT Radio Airplay

Crazier

Proposed deletion of The Last Song (soundtrack)

Taylor Swift

Orphaned non-free image File:Miley Cyrus - When I Look at You cover.jpg

You'll Always Find Your Way Back Home#music video

Can you

Talkback

Taylor Swift disco FLC

Taylor Swift discography RIANZ

Taylor Swift album

Taylor Swift discography FLC

April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive

Miley project