User talk:Ioana Maior

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... having the Draft:Ion I. Lapedatu I have created reviewed so that it could be published. Is there anything specific I must do to this effect? Furthermore, I would like it to be connected with the article with the same title on ro.wikipedia.org Thanks

Ioana Maior (talk) 10:08, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the English Wikipedia! I have added the "Articles for creation" template to the top of Draft:Ion I. Lapedatu. If you click the green "Submit" button, that will send it for review, and an experienced user will either accept it or give you feedback.

Once it is in the main encyclopedia, you should find that it is automatically linked by Wikidata to the Romanian article, and inter-language links will appear in the left-hand sidebar on both articles. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ion I. Lapedatu (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ion I. Lapedatu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 21:51, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ioana Maior, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 21:51, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ion I. Lapedatu has been accepted

Ion I. Lapedatu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 03:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexandru I. Lapedatu has been accepted

Alexandru I. Lapedatu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 04:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... The article about "Alexandru I. Lapedatu" has been published with the title "Alexandru Lapedatu". It is mandatory to keep the initial "I." in the name to avoid confusion with other family members. Note that the same writing is used for his twin brother "Ion I. Lapedatu" that also has a published article. I understansd that this change requires the intervention of an administrator - please help! Ioana Maior (talk) 10:15, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I can help you. Do not worry, this change does not need the intervention of an admin. To resolve this dispute, I need to ask you a question. Is Alexandru I. Lapedatu refferend in this format in your sources? If so, I will rename the page. If not, sorry, we cannot carry out the move. I am working according to the WP:UCRN policy, if you would like to know. Do not worry. Cheers, FriyMan ^{Per aspera ad astra} 15:49, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources seem uniformly to refer to him as "Alexandru Lapedatu". Thus that's what our article should be named, too. OlEnglish corrected the page name (see Help:Moving a page on how to rename pages). Huon (talk) 21:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As well as that, people who will use his initial are going to be redirected to the page anyways, as the Alexandru I. Lapedatu page is a redirect from a move right now, so do not worry. Cheers, FriyMan ^{Per aspera ad astra} 04:01, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ioana Maior. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]