User talk:Intsar Khatana

May 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bhadanakas, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 10:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. ∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 16:14, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. ∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 16:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please don't turn disambiguation pages into articles, as you did at Kasana. Also, please have a look at WP:V and WP:RS: the sources that you're citing either don't support the content you are adding, or are not reliable. utcursch | talk 09:11, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Gurjar clans

Hello. Your recent edit to List of Gurjar clans appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:07, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see Talk:List of Gurjar clans#Inclusion criteria - thank you - Arjayay (talk) 13:08, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, If an additive need separate page then I will make it. I think it is impossible to show a new page for every clan. We will just show it. If require then I will make it. Intsar Khatana (talk) 13:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Gurjar clans . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
It was clearly explained, above, that you should not add names to lists, unless they already have their own article on the English Wikipedia, but you have continued doing so. Please stop - Arjayay (talk) 14:58, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look at WP:RS: random books by authors of your caste/tribe are not acceptable sources. Neither are instagram, facebook, and twitter. utcursch | talk 20:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Respected Sir! You are respected for because you are senior to me. I have added valuable refrences from not only our bards, also from other historians. Wikipedia gives the opportunity to add external links that's why I have added external links.The way you are editing a Wikipedia page is not right approach.If you think some part of an article don't have reliable sources mark it or correct it so that other can improve or update this article. But you are removing the whole article that's not right approach if you find anything wrong in the article just mark it. It is my humble request please reset this article and mark where you find faults. Please don't remove whole article again. Thanks! Have a good day. Intsar Khatana (talk) 04:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Intsar Khatana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not make multiple accounts for illegitimate reason, My username is on my real name thats why i got harassments on this account To stop this harassment Then remember i have made a account 3 years ogo So i retrieve it. It was also on real name and I have change its username so i can stop harassment thats why i was using other account. This is only reason to have multiple account.Please unblock me. THANKS Intsar Khatana (talk) 06:08, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Clear violation of WP:SOCK and nothing here convinces me you understand this. Yamla (talk) 10:47, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You appear to have edited as Duckey007 to continue an edit war at Khatana. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:19, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was already editing khatana page from duckey007 to prevent using real username ID, not to start editing war. This is only reason to edit from Duckey007. Please unlock me and revert this Khatana article. Thanks Intsar Khatana (talk) 07:04, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]