User talk:User12224

Welcome!

Hello, America ReFramed, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as America ReFramed Episodes, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Iffy★Chat -- 08:06, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of America ReFramed Episodes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on America ReFramed Episodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Iffy★Chat -- 08:06, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. Waggers TALK 11:17, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

User12224 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Username is not affiliated with company or organization InternTK (talk) 17:11, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline of duplicate unblock request; will review latest. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 18:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What does the "TK" in your username indicate?(generally; if it is something personal do not tell me specifically). 331dot (talk) 17:38, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

":Hi there, they are random letters InternTK (talk) 18:49, 24 July 2018 (UTC)"[reply]

Waggers I am interested in hearing your views on this matter. 331dot (talk) 19:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While I am not Waggers (despite the somewhat similar username), I did interact with InternTK on the IRC help channel. I would recommend that the best option here is to have a rename, which is what I suggested to them when I chatted with them. I don't think there's any ill intent here with the username, nor do I think it's actually a shared username, but our username policy states that a username should not "...imply the likelihood of shared use", which this does in my eyes. Just my two cents. Waggie (talk) 09:36, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User12224 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

User1222 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Past username implies the likelihood of shared useInternTK (talk) 16:42, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline of duplicate unblock request; will review latest. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 18:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

aw, jeez

Sorry, we already have one. Please try again.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:25, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

User12224 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

User12224 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Past username implies the likelihood of shared use InternTK (talk) 10:31 am, Today (UTC−7)

Accept reason:

Account renamed and since it was the only reason for the block, I have accepted this unblock request. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 18:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you ever have any questions, please feel free to reach out at the Teahouse, on my talk page, or that of any experienced user/admin. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 18:28, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed InternTK to User12224

globally renamed InternTK to User12224. sorry for the trouble-- Dlohcierekim  (talk) 17:53, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I'm late to this party - thanks User:Dlohcierekim and User:Waggie for sorting this out. User12224, welcome to Wikipedia! Waggers TALK 11:42, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: America ReFramed Episodes (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:America ReFramed Episodes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:America ReFramed Episodes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Draft:America ReFramed Episodes

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:39, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of America ReFramed episodes (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Catrìona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a really promising list, but you need to back up its content by citing reliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of America ReFramed episodes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of America ReFramed episodes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Catrìona (talk) 22:37, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User12224! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Catrìona (talk) 22:37, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of America ReFramed episodes has been accepted

List of America ReFramed episodes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Catrìona (talk) 22:40, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: America ReFramed Episodes (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Catrìona was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of America ReFramed Episodes instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:America ReFramed Episodes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:America ReFramed Episodes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Catrìona (talk) 22:41, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

General references

Wikipedia permits the use of General references, but please be clear which sources are being used as general references. Catrìona (talk) 22:45, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]