User talk:IntercontinentalEmpire

Greetings, i am the IntercontinentalEmpire and i'm here to help make Wikipedia better. I shall be editing pages that pertain to either politics, maps and information.

I hope to see you guys around and have a nice day

Create jpg Or PNG

Hi, you please upload the pictures in File:Vani Bhojan.jpg Or File:Vani Bhojan.png. upload today itself please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4072:601E:EF1A:D4DE:8076:1275:B00A (talk) 05:20, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, IntercontinentalEmpire, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Demographics of Russia did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Alex Bakharev (talk) 23:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by Zoroastrian population. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AntonSamuel (talk) 06:36, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Corruption Perceptions Index. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. KREOH (talk) 11:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Preventing declines in the population of Russia via Wikipedia

Your editing history suggests that you may have a conflict of interest. I base this perception on the fact that you appear desperate to give the world the impression that the population of Russia is not declining. What unseen force compels you to push so hard for the numbers you want, without citing a better source than what has been provided for the numbers you don't want? Is it your employer? If you have a conflict of interest, Wikipedia requires that it be declared on your Talk page.--Quisqualis (talk) 02:55, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

From another user: I provided the links to the most credible source of actual demographic information: the official data from Russian Federal State Statistics Service. There is no other initial source. OECD, World bank and others provide you with the same information, just delayed. The figure 146,804,372 is from 2017 not 2020 - this is what the OECD link says, but you didn't even check it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gradoved (talk • contribs) 18:27, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, that is preposterous, no employer is telling me and commanding me to change the page, this info is accurate, enough is enough now. I can't believe you would even think about that, i'm not under anyone or any corporation. I will not tolerate this any longer. We need to meet in the middle and handle this somehow. I'm putting actual information, for the last time, end this edit war. My sources are of fair use and this kind of hostility towards me is intolerable and terrible. Can we please just stop this nonsense and make an agreement please? There is no need for this, we're supposed to be professionals here, not fool around and fight each other, why should we fight? I will try not to touch the page anymore but i will assure you this, Russia isn't declining, nor is it growing, it's steady. At least put a steady signal on the page then we can forget about this. The deal is this, you can keep the number you added but i'd like you to put a steady icon because they have halted a good amount of their decline. If you do this, i promise to not touch it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IntercontinentalEmpire (talk • contribs) 18:49, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, you have yet to leave a single citation of a reliable source, and continue to edit war over your made-up numbers. You have also distinguished yourself by feigning martyrdom, when in fact you are the aggressor vs Wikipedia. Please desist. PS, Wikipedia does not do PR for anyone by their request.--Quisqualis (talk) 08:09, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Wikipedia:Help desk, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 04:34, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Demographics of Russia, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor".

At Special:Diff/938695256, you again asserted that the change you made to the population and its source cite was MINOR, even though you are currently involved in a dispute over that very subject. Please do not continue to misuse the minor flag.

—[AlanM1(talk)]— 23:13, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@IntercontinentalEmpire: At my talk page, you asked

I don't understand, i always use the minor tag appropriately, what's going on, i had no intent to misuse anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IntercontinentalEmpire (talk • contribs) 23:44, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

WP:MINOR (which I mentioned) begins:

A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions. Examples include typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, and reversion of obvious vandalism. A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute.

The latest one I referenced (Special:Diff/938695256) changed the population, two characterizations from "decrease" to "steady", and replaced a cite. This is clearly not minor in any case, let alone when you are involved in a dispute over it.

I sent the previous notice, mentioning your posts to Wikipedia:Help desk, the most recent of which were three edits that added 672 bytes to the page (adding to an existing thread that you started; here, here, and here). Nothing wrong with that – it's just not "minor". I wouldn't have mentioned it except that I saw several previous examples in your edit history (e.g., here, here, here, well, really, almost all of the rest), and so felt you were not aware of the policy. I hope this helps. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 00:31, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, i really don't understand, all i know is that i'm inputting my sources and accurate info and adding it to the page. I'm very confused about this, i try my best to stay within the guidelines, please drop the subject if because i simply can't understand it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IntercontinentalEmpire (talk • contribs) 01:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just don't check "minor" for your edits. Schazjmd (talk) 01:41, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then, as long as i'm not bothered with this again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IntercontinentalEmpire (talk • contribs) 02:28, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't one bit confused, and you may expect to be "bothered" continuously with "this" until you cease your POV editing and conform with Wikipedia's standards. Your empty words are most tiresome, IntercontinentalEmpire; we've seen your game, played by others before you; in fact, it's a regular occurrence and requires very little effort to detect.--Quisqualis (talk) 20:02, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Howdy hello! Friendly note here: you may not be aware of our policy on edit warring. You are not allowed to revert other editors back and forth without cause. Please note that in the matter of demographics and Russia, you should allow discussion to take its course. Just a few days of talking it out should solve the matter. While discussion is happening, do not revert to your version of the page. Reverting more than 3 times in a 24 hour period will get you blocked, and I don't want to see that happen. So please, engage with me and others in discussion so that we can come to a consensus on how to cover the matter. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 05:17, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to edit war, I'll block you. PhilKnight (talk) 17:06, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want people to stop feeding bad information and vandalizing the page, this conflict needs to settle somehow.

Russian population source

https://wikielections.com/europe-elections/russia/russia-demographics-population-religion-percentage-2017-city-immigrants/

Do you see, that your source (aside from reliability questions) is clearly stated as 2017 data and that writing it as 2020 data is plainly and extremely wrong? --Seryo93 (talk) 18:04, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When I last checked though, it didn't have that number, it should of said something on Russia's population being 146780 or something, not 146804. I'm not sure why it says t but there's no reason to continue, so fine, I'll not touch the page but I highly request there should at least be a steady sign, after all the -35000 people were not mainly deaths, it was emigration. Their natural growth rate is sustained and it shouldn't be tampered with. I apologize for this but just remember that they are no longer declining since they halted it within the past few years, good day sir.

Speedy deletion nomination of Treasure Planet (2022 film)

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Treasure Planet (2022 film), to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:18, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand, what is wrong? I ensured accurate information based on the movie, why is this an issue? Please explain to me why it might be deleted? TailBlazer101, I need information, why is this categorized as a hoax?

Speedy deletion nomination of Treasure Planet (2022 film)

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Treasure Planet (2022 film), to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB

Hi, IntercontinentalEmpire. Please understand that IMDB is only accepted as a reliable source under specific circumstances. An essay to help editors determine the value of that source can be found at WP:IMDB. Also, if you are in need of advice or help regarding reliable sources you may post at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Tiderolls 13:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Winthrop Cemetery, Winthrop, Massachusetts moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Winthrop Cemetery, Winthrop, Massachusetts, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 15:48, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by Zoroastrian population, you may be blocked from editing. AntonSamuel (talk) 20:22, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by Zoroastrian population. Please familiarise yourself with the basic tenets of Wikipedia here: Wikipedia:Core content policies. The inflated figures you've added are not supported by independent sources which have not reported the figures of hundreds of thousands of converts in Iraqi Kurdistan. I have already informed you twice before about how these sorts of edits you've made cannot be seen as acceptable. AntonSamuel (talk) 23:23, 15 September 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bungler91 (talk • contribs) [reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]