User talk:Inner strength from love

Welcome!

Hello, Inner strength from love, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Taakatism, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:19, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Taakatism

The article Taakatism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. A search reveals a little under 300 hits with most pages being forums, Wikipedia and other pages that do not qualify as reliable sources. Only references included are self-published.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:19, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taakatism

Hi, I went to explain why the article should be kept, and contest the deletion with a holdon tag, only to find someone had deleted it before I managed to edit! Can you please allow a deletion discussion at the very least? Thanks for reading and may you be well. Inner strength from love (talk) 20:24, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article in question has actually been deleted four times so far - three times as a speedy, and another time trough a deletion discussion. The conclusion of the AFD is still valid for this article - there are no reliable sources that establish notability, and therefor it has been removed without discussion. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:38, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Taakatism was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to request article creation again once the issues have been addressed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 21:29, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Taakatism

Hello Inner strength from love. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Taakatism.

If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Taakatism}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Minima © (talk) 12:07, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trembulo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trembulo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trembulo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sean Shibe

The article Sean Shibe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:16, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sean Shibe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sean Shibe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Shibe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:54, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]