User talk:InnerCitade1045

Welcome!

Hi Historyandshit! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 15:52, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lodi (Pashtun tribe), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 13:05, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lohani. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lohani was changed by Historyandshit (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858675 on 2022-10-26T11:38:48+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tatur has been accepted

Tatur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 15:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Claimed descent from the Lodi tribe

Hello, Historyandshit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Claimed descent from the Lodi tribe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because your username is a clear violation of Wikipedia's username policy – it is obviously offensive, profane, violent, threatening, sexually explicit, disruptive, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to Wikipedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}}

Daniel Case (talk) 22:29, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

InnerCitade1045 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

wikipediahasnohumor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

changing my username since previous one was said to be offensive. Historyandshit (talk) 08:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You can certainly express your views regarding Wikipedia on your user page, but you shouldn't use your username to do it. Please propose something else. Yes, we do take usernames seriously here, this is a public forum with people from all over the world and we try to have a basic standard of decorum. If you wouldn't go into a public place and announce your name as "historyandshit", you shouldn't do it here, either. 331dot (talk) 09:07, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InnerCitade1045 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

When selecting my username, "historyandshit," my primary goal was to capture my genuine interest in history in a casual and approachable manner. It was not my intention to offend or disrupt the community. I was simply engaging in discussions and following the rules without causing any trouble. I understand that perspectives on language and decorum can vary significantly. Historical figures like Aristotle and Diogenes, despite their substantial contributions to philosophy and knowledge, often exhibited behavior and language that might be considered unconventional or unsophisticated by today's standards. My intent with the username was in a similar vein – to express my enthusiasm for history in a way that feels authentic to me. I have a lot of important edits to make to pages but if my block is not appealed, I will continue my protest, as I have done so for the past 9 months. I will not betray my authentic self. Historyandshit (talk) 19:08, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is the second time you have refused to pick an appropriate username. You'll likely only get one more chance. I very strongly suggest you pick a username that complies with WP:USERNAME. If you are unwilling to follow our policies, you won't be unblocked and will likely lose talk page access. Yamla (talk) 19:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

InnerCitade1045 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

InnerCitade1045 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

changing username.

Accept reason:

Renamed. 331dot (talk) 17:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case Just confirming that the username was the only concern here. 331dot (talk) 15:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as it seems, yes. Daniel Case (talk) 17:50, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]