User talk:Infinite0694

Please give me some facts about this dynasty — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.173.233.107 (talk) 02:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Hi Infinite0694, the information I removed from the Park Avenue article is not relevant to the article. You suggested I leave comments in the edit summary, which I had done. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I re-deleted the restored content. Thanks

help please

Could youhelp me put in the proper references for the Fletcher Webster article? This is the one for his marriage: http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=MATownVital&h=19478887&indiv=try&o_vc=Record:OtherRecord&rhSource=6742 68.32.154.213 (talk) 13:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@68.32.154.213:

Done--Infinite0694 (talk) 14:50, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello Infinite! I've just read your wiki-bio and I couldn't resist to ask you a favour. I'm an italian wikipedian and I'm looking for someone who can traslate me this text from english to japanese. It's really hard for us to find someone who knows both languages, so I decided to try and ask you. Don't worry, if you don't want to, there's no problem :-) --Sakretsu (talk) 20:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakretsu: Hi, Sakretsu! I'm Japanese wikipedian. Of course! You got it. But...it may take time for me to reply to that because I have a lot of stuff to do today.--Infinite0694 (talk) 20:45, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Take your time.--Sakretsu (talk) 20:56, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakretsu: Completion. Also on; jp:利用者:Infinite0694/sandbox --Infinite0694 (talk) 23:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakretsu: P.S. //　Sorry, I am not sure what the purpose of this letter is, or who it is addressed to (ie. whether you sent it to the company or sent it as a personal message). I might have a mistake with the translation. For example; "御社", "貴方". Please tell me a little bit more in detail about this. --Infinite0694 (talk) 09:07, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's my bad. Actually, we would need a version for both cases: usually we should find a key person to contact (eg 竜騎士07 of 07th Expansion), but most of the time we don't have such information. That's why, in those cases, we would need to address the letter to the company in general. Obviously if you don't have time, it's perfectly fine only the version addressed to the company. Anyway, I can't say anything else than thank you again, you can't even imagine how long I looked for someone extremely kind as you. Thanks--Sakretsu (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakretsu: Okay, I got it. I'd try as best as I can to match your desires. Next time, please send me an email directly.--Infinite0694 (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Infinite, I didn't understand if I can use your translation for companies or if it is still incomplete. Also, I'd like to know if you prefer to be contacted always by email or just in case of requests.--Sakretsu (talk) 12:28, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakretsu: Sorry, Sakretsu. I apologize for the delay in replying. I've been to intending to get in touch with "07th Expansion" directly regarding whether or not the images are approved to be used on Italian Wikipedia, but I have yet to receive an email response from you, so I have put this to the side for now. However, it seems that I previously mislead you due to my poor explanation. If you approve, I will begin negotiating directly with 07th Expansion. Also, if you are okay, I would prefer to directly communicate with you through Email(in any situation). Plus, I would like to inquire whether you intend to use the images only on Italian Wikipedia(or Wikimedia Commons?). If you intend to upload it on Wikimedia Commons(including Ja wiki), I will change the negotiations accordingly.--Infinite0694 (talk) 14:56, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Episode summary length

Hello, I would like to point out that writing summaries of excessive length as you have done on List of Cross Ange episodes is not only wholly unnecessary, but no one would even bother to read such long summaries, especially your longest summary on the list to date, episode 20. I see that you also write summaries of suitable length as on Saekano: How to Raise a Boring Girlfriend for episode 7, so I can't understand why you're writing so much for Cross Ange. So please, it would be in everyone's interest (and would save you a whole bunch of time) if you kept your summaries to roughly the length of your Saekano episode 7 summary I linked above.--十八 04:51, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Juhachi: Hi, Juhachi! Thanks for your advice. I'll be more careful next time, and try to make an effort at writing a summary between 400 and 700 words [1]. Thanks.--Infinite0694 (talk) 10:30, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

400-700 is for feature films, which would be about 4-5 anime episodes in total. Your Saekano episode 7 summary is much more appropriate for a 24 minute episode, which comes to just under 200 words. Episode 6's summary is about 250, but that's still good. So something between 200-300 words is what you should be shooting for, I would recommend.--十八 11:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Juhachi: I am a big mess right now. Er, This[2]. I think it's on a case by case basis. (I reckon Cross Ange isn't Saekano.) --Infinite0694 (talk) 11:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No matter how intricate a series may or may not be, summaries of that length are absolutely unnecessary since no one would even bother reading it, so it doesn't help anyone. The summaries are not meant to be a replacement for watching the episode. They're meant to give an overview of the important points, which is why film plots are recommended for a 400-700 word length, but that is for feature films that are 2 or more hours in length. Episode 21 of Cross Ange is at a mind-bogglingly 1200 words at this edit for a roughly 24 minute episode (22 or so if you discount the OP/ED). That is roughly 50 words for every minute of the episode, and I know there cannot be so much going on every single minute of each episode to warrant that level of intricate detail.--十八 12:50, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just stumbled here but I've been keeping my eye on the Cross Ange episodes for awhile now and I have to agree with what Juhachi said. It's perfectly normal to get passionate about a series and write without restraint. Unfortunately on Wikipedia there can be too much of a good thing. Summaries are not meant to be detailed play-by-plays. In my opinion, only episodes 16 and above need to be reduced. If the 2-300 word count is little bit tough to gauge, try limiting yourself to at least 7-8 sentences per episode. Take care. —KirtZ^Message 09:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@KirtZJ: I wish to discuss the validity, if it's good or bad, to write a summary between 400 and 700 words on Cross Ange. I think it varies by the case, but 1200 words is too long to read. At least in the case of "List of School Rumble episodes", a length between 100 and 700 words is approved. I think that the length of the summary of episode 16 is also the most appropriate for Cross Ange.--Infinite0694 (talk) 09:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the history of the School Rumble episodes page, I wouldn't say they were intrinsically "approved". If we are comparing summary lengths you should look at The Flash (2014 TV series). See the summaries of a show that is twice the length of one anime episode? A good summary is meant to be a brief overview of something. It is in no way intended to go into any particular detail. No matter how much plot is packed into a 22 minute anime episode, they should at least 250 words at a minimum. This is not a rule. Merely a guideline which will allow a casual reader some breathing room. With that being said, I'll have to stand by the reduction of episodes 16+. 250 words is a huge amount when you actually look at it. —KirtZ^Message 10:13, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@KirtZJ: I got it. I sincerely accept your opinion. But just because of that, do you you want me to re-do the whole thing? I don't think it's necessary to forcibly rewrite it as of this moment, but I'll certainly be more careful when I write next time. The reality is that the summary is between 200 and 400 words, like the "List of Shirobako episodes". It is now too late to make a reduction to the length of these summaries. I wish you'd told me a little bit sooner... Thanks.--Infinite0694 (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is never too late. I assure you, if I was watching Cross Ange and writing these summaries, they would not be anywhere near 1200 words in length. How do you think the first 15 or so episodes managed to be of reasonable length?--十八 22:21, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Juhachi: Hi, Juhachi! "1200 words" is in the past. When compared with the contents of episodes 1 through 15, I feel that the complexity of the plot in recent episodes has doubled in volume. Thus, I feel that a summary between 200 and 300 words is not sufficient to convey to the reader what is happening during these episodes. Thanks.--Infinite0694 (talk) 14:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you for your shortened edit but the current length of Recently My Sister is Unusual for the first episode is around 310 words, which is within the range. What I could use more help with are the larger ones. I want to shorten things up, but still make it clear what is going on at the backbone of the story. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:36, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep watching the Yuudachi article, I'll watch some of the other ones with popular kanmusu equivalents

just keep watching and reverting that until they are bored, I'll watch some of the other ones that are easy targets for KC based vandalismDesign A-125 (talk) 06:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

International Mathematics Union

While I understand that AssistIMU (talk · contribs) probably has a conflict of interest regarding the IMU, I believe the edits that you reverted were probably legitimate. Badly formatted, but legitimate. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not gibberish

I changed the deletion criterion on Kyaw Ye Paing. The article isn't gibberish, it's just written in Burmese, which likely didn't render properly on your browser (nor on mine). Fortunately, Google translate was able to make some sense of it, letting me know that the article is about a WP:MILL blogger (although, maybe in Burma, the mere fact of blogging can't be considered run-of-the-mill). In any case, the article makes no claim of notability, and has been so tagged. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiDan61: Thank you for letting me know. For your information, my browsers are the following: chrome, IE and Lunascape (turn into garbled characters).--Infinite0694 (talk) 21:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you'd have to go through some work to get the Burmese character set support on any browser you'd normally use in English. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:19, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Marc Schiller

I created the page and I want to delete it. I'm tired of personal attacks from those who do not know the entire story. I'm deleting my content. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Optiontrader11 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Optiontrader11: I put a tag on your article to request a speedy deletion.--Infinite0694 (talk) 18:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grizzly tobacco edit

Just a note here, one, thank you for correcting that previous edit that removed my flavors offered edit. Two, I may be adding to that some, with more details as to when the various flavors were released, though at present I'm still trying to track down all the dates. Wanted to warn you that I often do not log in like I should, so if you see a random IP number adding particular dates of release and such, it's likely me. Edit: (you know...It would help if I signed the darned thing.)Kitsunedawn (talk) 08:58, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hi Infinite0694. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 21:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

recent sockpuppetry

Hiya, can you restart or initate the second sockpuppet investigation on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/HoEuhophonium? I think when CRE ZE was added to the original like that, the admins will probably just ignore it and close it. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:53, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your edits[3] in my place. I appreciate your time.--Infinite0694 (talk) 11:31, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For your work dealing with the massive troll raid on Sierra Vista High School (Spring Valley, Nevada) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:40, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SPI discussion

I've contacted Sergecross73‎ (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) for his thoughts on the matter with HoEuhophonium. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 08:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sjones23: Hi, Sjones23. I would appreciate your cooperation. By the way, I think that we need to integrate the contents of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HoEuhophonium with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dragonron because all the suspected sockpuppets have been blocked due to highly similar behavior on the exact same articles.--Infinite0694 (talk) 12:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal undone

Hi there! Just to let you know I have undone your change here. I think you may have been a bit hasty reverting this! See my change here ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 12:51, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Addshore:Thank you for pointing that out. It seems that I was mistaken about it.--Infinite0694 (talk) 13:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries :) ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 13:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discusion about Sonam K Sonam

You left Sonam K Sonam two warnings, so I thought you might want to comment at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Sonam_K_Sonam. Thanks! --Ronz (talk) 16:25, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sonam's blocked. --Ronz (talk) 22:52, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that I ended up replying late and that I could not meet your expectations. Anyway, it was so awesome of you. --Infinite0694 (Talk) 05:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem whatsoever. I was only expecting that someone would look over the situation and block the editor. Glad to have you looking over such articles. --Ronz (talk) 15:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

Nice work getting Warner_Sun (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Versus001 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) blocked for socking.

I suspect that editor Titanium_Dragon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Cyanidethistles (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) may be related to Warner Sun and Versus001 too.

Can you investigate? Thanks again. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} { Talk } 20:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Checkingfax: I've been a user since the early days. I'm not sure why you'd even think I was a sock. Titanium Dragon (talk) 23:22, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request your feedback at a GA Review

Could you please comment, specifically on whether or not there are ongoing Stability concerns, at Talk:Charlotte (anime)/GA1 ?

Thank you for your time,

— Cirt (talk) 02:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cirt and Juhachi: I left a comment on Talk:Charlotte (anime)/GA1--Infinite0694 (Talk) 05:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! — Cirt (talk) 05:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unhelpful edit

Wikipedia seems to think that you have considered my edit (81.152.228.121)to Kennet and Avon Canal to be unhelpful. I fail to understand why as it is a fact that can be verified and adds to the article? Please give me a good reason or I will go back and revert it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.228.121 (talk) 13:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@81.152.228.121: Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability. Per WP:BURDEN, the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution. --Infinite0694 (Talk) 13:27, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CSD

I'm not fully following your CSD nominations. (E.g. User_talk:110.66.216.170) I don't speak Japanese, so the link doesn't help me. My guess is that LTA stands for long-term abuse. Are these talk pages associated with IP's who have been banned in the Japanese Wikipedia? If so, what is the policy basis for removal of the page on the English Wikipedia? Or perhaps I misunderstood the rationale for deletion.--S Philbrick (Talk) 15:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am wondering that too. You seem to have nominated a very large number of IP talk pages for deletion. Deletion of talk pages is something we do only under extreme circumstances. All these edits are simply adding a welcome message. I don't see how that can be characterised as "x-wiki abuse / Harassment". Since you have not replied to the post above after several hours, I am going to decline the CSDs as invalid. SpinningSpark 17:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations of pages like this one are definitely never going to be deleted. Other editors have already contributed to the page. SpinningSpark 17:56, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spinningspark and Sphilbrick, the pages were created by a user who on ja.Wikipedia is the subject of a Long Term Abuse case (see here), and the user has been basically creating talk pages for any IP who has edited the page Cross Ange, and (incorrectly) tagging the IP with Infinite0694 in the edit summary (effectively accusing every IP that has ever edited that article of being Infinate0694). I don't see an issue with G6 deletion of the pages, as they are disruptive, and the user who created them (Isp checker van and 217.72.207.162, plus a range) are globally locked/blocked. The talk page creation was pure disruption, and the edit summaries are misleading accusations. If the talk pages have some value (which they probably do, if they are formatted correctly), at a minimum the misleading edit summaries should be deleted. Which I have done. Just wanted to give you some background here.--kelapstick^(bainuu) 20:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. If the CSD requests had explained it was an edit summary issue I would probably have deleted them myself (except for the ones that had other posts already on the page). SpinningSpark 23:19, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries Spinningspark, it took me a while to figure out what the issue was. I have gone ahead and RevDeled all the relevant edit summaries, so there really shouldn't be any issues any more. Cheers, --kelapstick^(bainuu) 23:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the issue was complexly intertwined with related factors, so I consulted Kelapstick, GorillaWarfare and steward on how to deal with privacy related materials via #wikipedia-en ^connect, #wikimedia-stewards ^connect. What kelapstick said is all of the truth of a matter. @Kelapstick: I will never forget what you have done. Thanks,--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:35, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to see this was satisfactorily resolved.--S Philbrick (Talk) 17:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Infinite0694!

Happy New Year!

Infinite0694,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Thanks for your support

	Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award
	Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Anti-vandalism strawberries. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 04:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your global sysop maintenance edits

Infinite,

On the one hand, thanks very much for doing this. It's very helpful to us who are trying to keep small wikis running. (In my case, I'm an admin on Ladino Wikipedia.) Two questions and a point, if I may:

(question 1): Is there any reason I shouldn't be able to delete any empty category created by User:Babel AutoCreate at any time? Or are there rules by which those categories are supposed to be created (but were violated in some cases)?
(question 2): Deletion logs show three deletions you made on ladwiki, but two of the pages still exist. How is that?
(point): You might consider leaving a note on the local community page that you're doing this so that we're not caught by surprise.

Thanks again. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:52, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@StevenJ81:As a global sysop, I deleted three empty categories, which are requested on META. Per this, a bug in the Babel extension (see phab:T112868) caused a lot of badly named categories to be created, so we GS or local sysop or steward decide to delete such pages, which are listed on this[4]. After I deleted those pages, User:Babel AutoCreate recreated two pages[5][6]. I want to say my action is just maintenance, but I apologize if my GS action hurt your feelings. Thanks--Infinite0694 (Talk) 03:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't hurt my feelings, just took me some time to track down what was going on. StevenJ81 (talk) 13:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request (2)

Hey Infinite, I've sent you an email again. This message is to confirm you my identity on Wikipedia or in case you don't use that address anymore. If so, just let me know :-) --Sakretsu (talk) 17:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Infinite0694. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

Congratulations on your RFA! TranquilHope (talk) 03:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Infinite0694. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Infinite0694. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]