User talk:Kitsunedawn

Welcome!

Hello, Kitsunedawn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --IamtheWelcomeMan (talk) 23:25, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Gareth Griffith-Jones

Hello, Kitsunedawn. You have new messages at Gareth Griffith-Jones's talk page.
Message added 19:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 19:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kitsunedawn! Thank you for the "thanks"! For your records:

Don't know what you reverted on my Skoal (tobacco) edit, but thanks for keeping an eye on that. I thought adding the limited availability section was a good idea, since some of the tobaccos listed as discontinued are still found in certain stores. Not unlike the Copenhagen Mint flavor that is currently only found in Texas. Kitsunedawn (talk) 6:46 pm, 6 January 2014, Monday (1 month, 25 days ago) (UTC+0)

Hello Kitsunedawn Kitsunedawn An IP had blanked your section titled, Cuts and Flavors. I merely replaced it as it was. Thank you for visiting — please leave a note here when you read this. Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 7:13 pm, 6 January 2014, Monday (1 month, 25 days ago) (UTC+0)

Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 10:18, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Kitsunedawn, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Mz7 (talk) 20:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Power loom

The last two edits you made are fantastic- clearly written, and authoritative. We may need to do a little more to keep the Gods of Wikipedia happy- do you have any book reference you can point us to. Never mind the syntax- the reference you have already given is fine- we can work with that. What make of looms were you using? What other articles do we need?-- Clem Rutter (talk) 15:22, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bucks may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Buck's Club]], London]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:38, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification - BLP

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Referring specifically to Gamergate controversy and related articles and edits, but note this this alert applies to all edits related to the area identified above. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:00, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Traviss

Hello! Can we talk talk about Karen Traviss#Star Wars Controversy? Please take a look at my post at Talk:Karen Traviss and let me know what you think. Thanks! --Cerebellum (talk) 17:22, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unacceptable claims on Talk:Gamergate controversy

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Wikipedia is NOT a place for you to make defamatory, unsourced accusations about people. If you restore that talk page post, I will request that you be blocked forthwith. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 09:46, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Given that there is a notice above about about the necessity to be appropriate with comments and contents about living people, your actions are doubly disturbing. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:44, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban

In accordance with the discretionary sanctions regarding material about living persons and the GamerGate general sanctions, you are hereby banned indefinitely from making any edit to the GamerGate controversy article and its talk page and from making any edit or comment connected to GamerGate or any person invovled in GamerGate anywhere on Wikipedia. Violations of this topic ban will likely result in a permanent block. You may appeal this sanction to the administrators' noticeboard, or to the Arbitration Committee (via the contact details listed at that page). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:15, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Copenhagen (tobacco), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bourbon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kitsunedawn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kitsunedawn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]