User talk:Inference

Welcome!

Hello, Inference, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 07:39, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Try wp:RefToolbar/2.0 to generate references. See WP:NAMEDREFS about combining references. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:39, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laplace's approximation has been accepted

Laplace's approximation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 17:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website, I have blocked this account from editing. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken or in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 23:17, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Inference (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've carefully read the wikipedia rules regarding account names, I can't identify any specific rule which would preclude my account name.

Accept reason:

Unblocking per below. Happy editing. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexf: I'm a bit confused – Inference seems like a fairly normal English word, I'm not sure how it's indicative of a COI or other problem. Am I missing something? --Blablubbs (talk) 10:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blablubbs: Inference is indeed a common word. It is also the name of his website which he quoted in his article - www.inference.org.uk which triggered filter 149. -- Alexf^(talk) 10:25, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexf and Blablubbs: The assumption that I have association with www.inference.org.uk is mistaken, I've never contributed to that website, although I confess to having known its author before he passed away. I created a reference link to that page because it is a self contained, standard text book explanation in only 2 pages, and available online. I don't know exactly how these filters work, but the page I recently contributed about Laplace's approximation doesn't reference any of my own pages or any of my own work whatsoever - I do understand this is a concern for the wikipedia project, and respect it. Inference (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexf: Thanks, I missed that. Given the explanation above, and the fact that none of the account's contributions seem problematic to me, I'd be inclined to unblock. Would that be ok for you? --Blablubbs (talk) 17:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blablubbs: Ok. No issues then. -- Alexf^(talk) 18:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, unblocked. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexf and Blablubbs: thanks for the quick turnaround Inference (talk) 18:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]