User talk:Inelectra

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Josher8a (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:19, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Inelectra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not a sockpuppet of josher8a, how are you connecting me to this case? Inelectra (talk) 13:12, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient. You have to address to concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Josher8a/Archive. Yamla (talk) 13:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not sure how can I deny it, because I do not know what the concerns are, please help or explain Yamla (talk) . Inelectra (talk) 13:26, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, what exactly is your interest in Paulina Larocca? What exactly is your relationship with josher8a? Please be very specific. --Yamla (talk) 13:33, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla (talk) I do not have anything to do with them, haven't edited any that has to do with them. That is why I am asking how did you connect me to them? check my contributions Inelectra (talk) 13:54, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is incorrect. You have edited about Paulina Larocca. You must answer my questions if you wish to be considered for an unblock. --Yamla (talk) 14:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla (talk) Could you share my contribution? I am trying to remember but without success. what is a valid proofs of not knowing someone? because I do not know who josher8a is Inelectra (talk) 15:54, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like admins are blocking me on nothing....Inelectra (talk) 16:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You modified Paulina Larocca four times on 2019-07-25. You reverted Praxidicae nomination for deletion, twice. This is the last time I will respond here until you answer the questions I asked some time ago. You don't need to convince me, in any case; you are free to make a new unblock request and have another administrator review it. --Yamla (talk) 16:17, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have absolutely edited the now-deleted article Paulina Larocca. Primarily, it appears to me that you were edit warring with Praxidicae over the deletion tag. As the article is now deleted, only admins can see the edits to it, which can be found here: Special:DeletedContributions/Inelectra. I'll copy the log here for you:

(change visibility) 20:08, July 25, 2019 (diff | deletion log | view) . . Paulina Larocca
(change visibility) 20:07, July 25, 2019 (diff | deletion log | view) . . m Paulina Larocca (I do not think she should be deleted as she has some notability in australia and is the author of two books, I have seen worse articles.)
(change visibility) 20:05, July 25, 2019 (diff | deletion log | view) . . Paulina Larocca (Undid revision 907864932 by Inelectra (talk))
(change visibility) 19:57, July 25, 2019 (diff | deletion log | view) . . Paulina Larocca (Undid revision 907805592 by Praxidicae (talk))

Being dishonest about your editing is unlikely to be helpful to you here. SQL ^{Query me!} 16:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing a deletion doesn't make me a sockpuppet of josher .I am not beign dishonest but this is just a misunderstanding, I even undid my own edit because it was a mistake..Inelectra (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

oh I did not remember that, I don't know what to say I guess I will just stay blocked because you won't believe that I was just giving my opinion on a random article I thought it shouldn't be deleted, Inelectra (talk) 13:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SQL ^{Query me!} ok but what is so wrong about editing an article that was deleted already? is this even enough to block me? Inelectra (talk) 13:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Inelectra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is a misunderstading, who can I prove it}? Inelectra (talk) 15:47, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Dloh cier ekim 06:17, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Not declining because I blocked one of the sockpuppet accounts, but this does not address the underlying reason for your block: WP:UPE. There has been nothing but dishonesty from this sockfarm: User_talk:MER-C/archives/44#Paid_Edits. Recommend the withdrawal of talk page access. MER-C 18:11, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not beign dishonest. In fact you are mistaken and doing false accusations but you have the power to do it MER-C. Whatever man, nothing I can do to address an issue I have nothing to do with, my contributions are not abusive. I thought everyone could edit Wikipedia. Peace and please stop abusing your admin priveledges. Inelectra (talk) 15:00, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]