User talk:Incendiary Iconoclasm

Welcome!

Hello, Incendiary Iconoclast! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. ^{(talk to me) (My edits)} @ 15:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hugo Chávez

Hello, the reason why there are two Vice President sections within the infobox is, mainly, because there were differing Vice Presidents between his two spells in office—pre-coup, and then post-coup. For example, his Vice President at the time, Diosdado Cabello, preceded him as the Acting President of Venezeula for simply a few hours before he re-assumed his duties solely as VP again. Neve-selbert (talk) 18:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had to revert your recent edit as your view on the chronological order is reverse to the norm: the most recent tenure always appears above those tenures beforehand. Please take articles Harold Wilson, Benjamin Netanyahu, Victor Ponta, and Grover Cleveland, as examples of this. Neve-selbert (talk) 02:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Neve-selbert: Indeed, that order really seem to be the norm. However, that is very confusing. I was staring at those two "in offices" of Hugo Chávez. and it took me quite a long time to understand what that meant. Incendiary Iconoclasm 03:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Manners

Please do not attack others as you did here and here. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Déjà vu?

Are you Tetra quark? Isambard Kingdom (talk) 17:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sock Puppet Investigation

I am informing you that I have initiated a sock puppet investigation concerning you: [1]. Isambard Kingdom (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

block

@Jpgordon: What? I'm not anybody's "sock". You can't just block me like that, with no explanation whatsoever! Incendiary Iconoclasm 20:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning about image

@Isambard Kingdom: I strongly suggest you to re-add the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field image back in the Universe article. Let me bring your attention to the fact that there is a consensus in the talk page, and it indicates that the HUDF image is more appropriate. Also, if you check out the Universe article in other languages, you'll see that most of them use the HUDF image, and I don't see why it should be any different here. Thanks Incendiary Iconoclasm 15:45, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tetra quark, I know you are obsessed with this issue [2], but at this point, after multiple abuses on your part, I don't think your opinion matters much. The lead has been discussed at other times, see, for example [3], and I'm sure it will continue to be discussed in the future. As for you, I think it is more important that you sort out your own problems. Sincerely, Isambard Kingdom (talk) 16:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Isambard Kingdom: Seriously though, the image of the HUDF is much more appropriate and friendly to the readers. It doesn't matter that the CMB image was there when the article reached the good article status. The article isn't a good article because of that image, specifically (having an image is required). Incendiary Iconoclasm 22:23, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but since you are "blocked" and since I believe you are now supposed to use your talk page only to discuss being "unblocked", I don't feel comfortable discussing the particulars of an article. Isambard Kingdom (talk) 22:58, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mlpearc:@Chetvorno:@Isambard Kingdom: You have been part of the discussion in the Universe article about the lead image, and clearly the most appropriate image was the HUDF one. Can you please just add it into the article? It is much more relevant for the reader. Thanks. Incendiary Iconoclasm 18:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Incendiary Iconoclasm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]