User talk:InaJac

Welcome!

Hi InaJac! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 10:36, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Shirt58 :-) InaJac (talk) 10:38, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DOVID (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at DOVID instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DOVID and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DOVID, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:06, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, InaJac! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:06, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kinegram "copyright"

I reverted your addition to Barrier-grid animation and stereography, about Leonhard Kurz's "copyright" for the term Kinegram. It is off-topic for that article, which is about barrier-grid animation, not DOVID anti-counterfeiting technology. It also appears to be factually incorrect, since the right at issue appears to be a trademark, not a copyright. If Kurz wants to sue Sarcone for trademark infringement, they can do so; it's not our role to adjudicate whether Sarcone's use of the term infringes the trademark. --Srleffler (talk) 03:48, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Srleffler The indicated source indeed refers to a trademark. Thank you for pointing that out. As mentioned in our earlier comment, our modification was based on the fact that the term KINEGRAM is protected and used for a different technology since the 1980ies. We have now reflected this by inserting a reference to divert interested readers to the corresponding article. Not mentioning this (“original”) KINEGRAM in Barrier-grid animation and stereography would provide readers with incomplete and potentially misleading information. --InaJac (talk) 09:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused by your use of "our" to refer to yourself. Wikipedia accounts are for individuals only, not groups. See WP:NOSHARING for more on this.

I'll take a look at your edit. Article content needs to be on-topic. A pointer to a similarly named topic may be appropriate. Discussion of a different topic that happens to share the same name is not.--Srleffler (talk) 20:29, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Srleffler In order to avoid mistakes in the future, it would help me if you could explain to me in more detail why Kinegram does not seem relevant enough for an entry. In my opinion, there are entries on less interesting topics and with poorer sources. I just want to understand better. Thanks for the help!

And regarding "our": I do not share the account. I only had some support in researching the sources, which led me to speak of "us", sorry. The account is only used by me. --InaJac (talk) 08:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't the one that proposed removal of the Kinegram article, but the complaint was that it had poor sourcing (not enough references to reliable sources) and it wasn't clear that it satisfies the General Notability Guideline. Small topics are often better covered in a broader article where they fit. Covering kinegrams in the article on Leonhard Kurz makes sense (although that article had problems of its own). Another option for covering kinegrams would be in a broad article on anticounterfeiting measures or authentication methods. That would be best handled by an unbiased editor, though, not a representative of the company that makes them. --Srleffler (talk) 06:54, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:DOVID

Hello, InaJac. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DOVID, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leonhard Kurz moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Leonhard Kurz, is not suitable as written to remain published. As you have a declared conflict of interest and are paid by the company which this article relates, you must submit the draft via the articles for creation process. Polyamorph (talk) 12:54, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leonhard Kurz (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Paid editing really ought to get everything right. After all, you are paid to get it right. So why the primary and self published sources in your references

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leonhard Kurz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Leonhard Kurz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 15:56, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Leonhard Kurz

Hello, InaJac. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leonhard Kurz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Leonhard Kurz

Hello, InaJac. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Leonhard Kurz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:57, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]