User talk:InExcelsisDeo

Jesse Pinkman

Please take note of this change I made to something you added to the Jesse page. While I appreciate your efforts so far with that article, and that particular source/fact is an excellent one for the "Development" section, I made a minor change because Vince Gilligan says in that interview it actually was not the writers' strike that made him decide to keep Jesse, but rather that he was impressed with the character/actor. Also, I made some grammatical/spelling fixes and removed the sentence that began with "The Pinkman Charcater in the long run has proved a major asset..." because technically that is a point of view statement, which is not allowed. — Hun ter Ka hn 15:40, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Holby articles

Hi! I just wanted to say how nice it is to have someone working on Holby City character articles—they tend to be a bit of a neglected area, and Frieda Petrenko is definitely long overdue an article. I see you added Sacha Levy to the to-do list; I don't know whether you're planning on working on that yourself, but that's brilliant if so, he's another with a lot of potential for an article. By way of introduction, I'm Frickative, and the Holby articles are one of the main areas I edit in (myself and User:Raintheone are currently working on a draft article for Sahira Shah.) Something to watch out for going forward is Wikipedia's notability guideline - a character needs to be the subject significant coverage in reliable independent sources to be considered notable enough for an article, and I'm not sure Lulu Hutchison meets that mark yet. Articles should be more than just plot summaries, and the only development source I know of that could be used is an Inside Soap interview with the actress. Given that she's only around for eight episodes, the amount of coverage going forward isn't likely to increase significantly, so she might be better off merged into the Characters of Holby City article. From your user page, I see that you're relatively new to Wikipedia, so if you have any queries, or if there's anything I can help out with at any time, just let me know! Frickative 14:02, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Why does your signature link to User talk:Kuyabribri? Is that an alternative account of yours (or this an alternative account of that one), or is it a mistake? Even if you control both accounts, you ought not to link your other account in this way, and if you do own both accounts (and have a policy-based reason for using both accounts) you ought to make a prominent note on your user and usertalk pages that you are the same person, to avoid confusion. Regards, Bencherlite ^Talk 21:16, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See this diff, this diff, this diff. Bencherlite ^Talk 21:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And this diff, where you finally spot the problem, but fail to correct your previous message asking me if I was sure about what I'd said! Come on, how thick do you think I am not to spot that one? Bencherlite ^Talk 21:27, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well i dont think you are thick, i did say i wasnt aware. I do apologise if i didnt thank you for pointing out the error in my signature or offended you in anyway (it must have happened when i was copy n pasting the font code from another user). you shouldn't be so cynical, i only realised when i signed your talk page. Kind Regrads with a fixed signature --InExcelsis DeoTalk 21:31, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Character pictures

Hi, the reason that I did not delete File:Walter white breaking bad.jpg was because no one nominated it for deletion. We should not have pictures of living people that are non free here. You are welcome to nominate it for deletion. ps you have an impressive sounding username! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:24, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gotti

I started a stub for once principal production starts on my userpage. I'm fairly certain you can do that yourself, or create a subpage to move into main namespace later, and maybe use some of the stuff I found. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 01:01, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Magistrates of England and Wales

On 12 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Magistrates of England and Wales, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Lord Irvine dismissed a record of fifteen magistrates of England and Wales in a single year in 1999? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Magistrates of England and Wales.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for adding this article. DYK needs you. Victuallers (talk) 08:04, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rabinder Singh

Why are you presenting him as already being a High Court Judge? He is not one until he is sworn in, presently planned for October. Until then he holds office as a deputy under either s 9(4) or (possibly, since he was subsequently appointed as a Recorder) s 9(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981. The entry is simply wrong. Ironman1104 (talk) 15:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Snow White and the Huntsman

Hello, filming has begun on Snow White and the Huntsman, so I restored the article. Please keep working on it! Thanks, Erik (talk | contribs) 19:26, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Magistrates of England and Wales

- GA review nomination.

Hi, after some discussion with User:Bbb23 we are open to taking on this review together, would you have any objection to that? Also if you accept our offer please be aware this is both of our first GA review, so not to expect speedy work and their might be minor hiccups as we get used to the process, we would be looking to take our time a little. Off2riorob (talk) 15:38, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Magistrates of England and Wales

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Magistrates of England and Wales you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:13, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed the article on hold for seven days. There is some work to be done. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:44, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HC Byrne titles

Requesting your input D B D 23:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Jesse Pinkman.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Jesse Pinkman.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Square Chambers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Square Chambers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Square Chambers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ukexpat (talk) 18:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Downton Abbey

Wikipedia:WikiProject Downton Abbey, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Downton Abbey and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Downton Abbey during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk) 14:50, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fiona Hampton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fiona Hampton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiona Hampton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:36, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]