User talk:ImranAvenger

Rangchhati Union moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rangchhati Union, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:11, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: Hey! You should give me some times to add referances of reliable citations. But you don't give! After completing the article, I shall add referances. Okay, now what can I do after completing the article fully? - Avenger 💪 ^Talk 06:46, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ImranAvenger, Greetings. After you have add significant coverage of indedpendent, reliable sources, then click the submit button at the draft page for review. Pls also read WP:Your First Article, WP:GOLDENRULE and WP:REFB to familiar yourself on how to write an article, the needed requirements and provide inline citations. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:06, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: I've completed this article. But What a message of review is! 'This may take more than two months.' 😥 Please replace this article very soon. — Avenger 💪 ^Talk10:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Imran, pls remove all content without sources. We have 3.5K draft articles pending for review. Pls be patient. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:33, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: Thanks for your reply. I've found an article randomly which is Friendship book. Haha! There is no references at this article for 12 years. But the article isn't deleted. - Avenger 💪 ^Talk12:03, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are many articles existed which do not meet the notability guidelines and they are not deleted as users have yet to come around to tag them. Articles in mainspace would stay for good only if they truly meet the notability requirements. See also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST. thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:11, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rangchhati Union has been accepted

Rangchhati Union, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 18:06, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Stevey7788: Thanks for accepting my article. Here is my question that, when I shall make an article, should I always add Draft: before the article name? And then do I have to add the tag {{subst:submit}} for submitting to review?

— Avenger 💪 ^Talk 23:57, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creating an article in Draftspace and using the Articles for Creation process is the best practice for creating articles, especially for newer editors. If you create a page in Articlespace, it may be outright deleted for lack of notability or verifiable; creating an article in Draftspace or your personal sandbox gives you time to create and edit the article with enough information to demonstrate that it should exist on Wikipedia. Shrine of seven martyrs, for instance, was created with just a references section, which could get it nominated for speedy deletion for lack of content. Using {{inuse}} was a good idea, but it would have been better to create the article elsewhere and then move or copy/paste it (assuming that only you edited that draft/sandbox) to create the new article. Even when you complete your edits to that article, it still may be moved to Draftspace if it doesn't clearly establish notability with third-party sources. —Ost (talk) 13:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ost316: Thanks to you for giving me suggestions. I've already added references. I will keep mind these suggestions and next-time I will try in my sandbox when I will make an article without references.—ImranAvenger (talk) 14:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

I'm sorry I have no idea what is possible in languages other than English.— Rod ^talk 10:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodw: I'm not an expert editor in English Wikipedia but especially Bangla Wikipedia is in my hand. I've created four articles in English which are faced some fixings. From now I can edit English Wikipedia properly. So before creating, editing an article/segment, I try to know its valid guidelines. However please ask another Wikipedian to know about redirect, is it possible other languages than English?—ImranAvenger (talk) 11:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best to ask on the talk page of Wikipedia:Redirect.— Rod ^talk 11:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodw: Thank you.—ImranAvenger (talk)

Category:Places of interest in Netrakona District has been nominated for deletion

Category:Places of interest in Netrakona District has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 22:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sheikh Hasina University logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sheikh Hasina University logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]