User talk:Imjha1

Sitamarhi-Bhitthamore Road moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sitamarhi-Bhitthamore Road, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zayn Saifi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zayn Saifi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PohranicniStraze (talk) 07:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zayn Saifi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zayn Saifi, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zayn Saifi. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone 08:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Zayn Saifi. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Spiderone 08:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Zayn Saifi, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone 09:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Zayn Saifi. Spiderone 16:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zayn Saifi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zayn Saifi, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zayn Saifi. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone 09:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Zayn Saifi. Materialscientist (talk) 15:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, श्रीखंडी भिट्ठा

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, श्रीखंडी भिट्ठा. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Shrikhandi Bhittha. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Shrikhandi Bhittha. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Spiderone 18:46, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your article श्रीखंडी भिट्ठा

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page श्रीखंडी भिट्ठा to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohanpur, Madhubani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madhubani. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nikhil Sharma (YouTuber) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nikhil Sharma (YouTuber), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 17:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikhil Sharma (YouTuber)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nikhil Sharma (YouTuber) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mumbiker Nikhil. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS ^💬 18:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article is under development,it is very authentic and real page. Imjha1 (talk) 18:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikhil Sharma (YouTuber)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nikhil Sharma (YouTuber) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Nikhil Sharma (YouTuber). Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Imjha1. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Imjha1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Imjha1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 18:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Nikhil Sharma (YouTuber), give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Imjha1, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Imjha1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikhil Sharma (YouTuber)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nikhil Sharma (YouTuber) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mumbiker Nikhil. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nikhil Sharma (YouTuber) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nikhil Sharma (YouTuber), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 18:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC) Category:Indian Wikipedians[reply]

Nomination of Anup Maithil for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anup Maithil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anup Maithil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article is being improved.there are many ways to improve such article which are in their initial phase. Please check again the citation and references,all are correctly mentioned.To keep the Wikipedia articles improve on daily basis how it is needed to be done.Thanks Imjha1 (talk) 00:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imjha1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am contributing on Wikipedia since a long time.I am trying to improve myself as an editor on the daily basis.please unblock me.Imjha1 (talk) 16:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

There is no mistake. Since you don't think you did anything wrong, and are unable or unwilling to answer my questions, there are no grounds to remove the block. As such, I am declining your request. If you make another, someone else will look at it. 331dot (talk) 16:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please tell us specifically what you have done wrong, how you won't do it again, and what productive contributions you wish to make. Specifically, please describe your connection to the subjects of your edits. 331dot (talk) 16:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was promoting unknowingly a single article. I had no idea that editing a particular article again and again is against the policy of Wikipedia. I have learnt from this incident.I won't do this mistake again and I would like to be the part of the Wikipedia as an editor.Please unblock me Thank YouImjha1 (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please place new comments below this one- and as standard, unformatted comments, as only one open request is needed. Again, please describe your connection to the subject of your edits. Editing an article several times is not against policy, that is not the issue. 331dot (talk) 16:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion / advertising-only account Imjha1 (talk) 16:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion / advertising-only account. But I didn't advertised or promoted.by the way it may be a mistake.Unblock me.Thanks Promotion / advertising-only account.This was the reason,which I didn't notice.Unblock me.Thanks. Imjha1 (talk) 16:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imjha1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi,I was promoting/advertising -only account, Which I did was wrong.Now, I won't do it agin.please unblock thanks

Decline reason:

This is a direct contradiction to your statements immediately above and isn't the least bit convincing. For example, you haven't explained the exact, specific nature of your conflict of interest and you haven't told us what you'd write about instead, if unblocked. Note that you'll likely only get one more chance at an unblock, so make it count. Yamla (talk) 14:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Category:Administrators

Reason 04:10, 15 February 2021 Imjha1 (talk | contribs) no expiry set DGG (talk | contribs) editing (sitewide) account creation disabled Promotion / advertising-only account.I will not repeat the same mistake,so unblock me. Imjha1 (talk) 09:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Promotion / advertising-only account) Imjha1 (talk) 05:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Till now I couldn't find the reason behind it.why my account had blocked.Imjha1 (talk) 14:49, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Give me the proper reason why did Wikipedia blocked me.If u don't have the proper reason then unblock me.Imjha1 (talk) 14:51, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 46957

UTRS appeal #46957 is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. Please describe what constructive edits you'd make. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shrikhandi Bhittha page created and many more Imjha1 (talk) 06:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]