User talk:ImAudrey

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Lyodra Ginting, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Quid Est Squid (talk) 01:48, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Can you edit Lyodra's photo profile on english wikipedia? Use the best of her pict please. Thanks 223.255.229.68 (talk) 15:25, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lyodra (album)

The article Lyodra (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet WP:NALBUMS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:20, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: I'll-It (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paper9oll was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:I'll-It and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:55, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ImAudrey! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:55, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: I'll-It (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No change since the last decline. This is now the third decline. If this article is submitted again without any real edits to try and resolve the issues as mentioned by other editors, the article may be Rejected without the option to re-submit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:I'll-It and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 07:10, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: I'll-It (October 8)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mcmatter was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 04:41, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll-It moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to I'll-It. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because the subject currently does not meets the WP:GNG, WP:NBLP, and WP:NBAND criteria showing no significant coverage from secondary reliable sources that is independent of the subject.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:26, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hybe Corporation have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll-it moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to I'll-it. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because the subject currently does not meets the WP:GNG, WP:NBLP, and WP:NBAND criteria showing lack of significant coverage from secondary reliable sources that is independent of the subject apart from passing mentions from R U Next?'s related reportings.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of I'LL-IT

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on I'LL-IT, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. // Timothy :: talk 01:37, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'LL-IT moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to I'LL-IT (2). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because the subject currently does not meets the WP:GNG, WP:NBLP, and WP:NBAND criteria showing no significant coverage from secondary reliable sources that is independent of the subject.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:20, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:21, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — 🎄🎆 Paper9oll 🎆🎄 (🔔 • 📝) 13:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I'll-It (group) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I'll-It (group), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'll-It (group) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

This is your only warning; if you move a page disruptively again, as you did at Draft:I'll-It, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lightoil (talk) 03:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:I'll-It. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Hybe Corporation and R U Next?. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:15, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at R U Next?. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Illit (group). — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Illit. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 18:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Illit. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 03:04, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:46, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Illit. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Illit. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:37, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 15:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ImAudrey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for whatever mistakes I made. I promise I will not repeat it again. I really learn from my mistakes. But please unblock my account, I want to delete the "Controversy" session on ILLIT wikipedia. That session can make ILLIT get a lot of hate comments. Besides, no group includes controversy sessions in their articles except ILLIT. Whoever includes controversy in ILLIT articles is the one who is blocked. So I want to delete the "controversy" session. I actively edit wikipedia articles only for ILLIT and award articles that ILLIT was nominated for as well as kpop groups but mainly only for ILLIT group articles. ImAudrey (talk) 13:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This clearly demonstrates you need to remain blocked. Yamla (talk) 16:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This unblock request more only supports your current blocked status. In this unblock request you state you don't even understand why you were blocked, therefore how are you going to not do it again. Then go on to state you only goal is to continue the edit the article which caused you to get blocked in the first place. It seems like you may have a conflict of interest and may be best for you move on to other things or change you unblock request telling the reviewing admin exactly what you are going to do that is not related to this particular article and how you will avoid the exact issue which lead to your blocks. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ImAudrey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize with my mistake. I won’t add anything again, I uust only deleted something not related. Example that controversy section in illit wikipedia. Its not unecessary things. It’s supposed to be Hybe corporation page not illit. Because artists are not guilty. So if you please, unblock me :)) ImAudrey (talk) 13:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please read the guide to appealing blocks before trying again. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 01:35, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.