User talk:Ilovetvshows

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Editingmylove (talk) 17:15, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akshay Kharodia (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alalch E. was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akshay Kharodia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Alalch E. 10:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Creativitylove per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Creativitylove. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Ingenuity (t • c) 15:32, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ilovetvshows (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had not created this account for illegitimate reasons nor to abuse my editing abilities. Infact, this account was created out of a misunderstanding of a conversation between me and User:Explicit and I was not abusing my editing powers with this account. I genuinely wanted to contribute constructively in Wikipedia and that's all I was doing with this account. I had no other option than use this account for editing because User:JBW had denied me all access to editing with my other two accounts User:Commonedits and User:Amma&Papa even when I apologised for all the trouble I created in the past and promised to not repeat them again (I had also mentioned about my mental health issues which I had been going through at that time). Plus, I had also put forth my reasons for lying to the the community (I lied all because I did not want to get caught, "Which human being does not lie when he or she is in the verge of getting caught? I had also apologized for all my lies and sworn not to repeat them too). But nobody heard my pleas of apology. I just have one last plea, you can keep me blocked if you still believe that I should be penalized but please restore the deleted articles which I had created: Neha Harsora, Sayli Salunkhe and Bhumika Gurung (all the three of them are WP:NOTABLE) because trust me I have really worked very hard on these articles such that they meet all guidelines of an article in Wikipedia. Please do me just this one last favour. Ilovetvshows (talk) 16:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are describing block evasion. That's most definitely an illegitimate reason. Additionally, it makes it significantly less likely that your original account will be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 17:57, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What on earth do you mean by saying that I "denied [you] all access to editing" with the accounts Commonedits and Amma&Papa? I have never blocked either of those accounts, nor modified blocks on them.
What do you mean by saying that you "had no other option than use this account for editing"? Of course you had other options: requesting an unblock, or giving up on editing Wikipedia. (Without a doubt the latter would have been the best option, because you really don't seem to be able to understand what the problems are, or what you have been told, making it very unlikely that you will have the ability to edit in acceptable ways.)
In relation to your question "Which human being does not lie when he or she is in the verge of getting caught?" you may find it instructive to read the article False consensus effect.
Nobody is going to do you "one last favour", nor any favours. You have had every opportunity to comply with Wikipedia's requirements, and of your own free choice you have not taken up the option of doing so. You still have the option of requesting an unblock on your original account if you like. As Yamla has said above, your actions since the block have made it significantly less likely that any administrator will unblock it, and each time you evade your blocks, tell blatant and obvious lies, or post ridiculous unblock requests which don't address the reasons for the blocks, the more unlikely it will become, if you haven't already destroyed any chance of it at all. JBW (talk) 18:53, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ilovetvshows (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not lying anywhere in my previous unblock request. I genuinely want to use my editing abilities for constructive editing. Also, from my behavior in the accounts User:Amma&Papa and User:Ilovetvshows you can easily observe that I have never breached WP:CIVILity. Infact, even here I'm not replying to any of User:JBW's personal attacks. So please just give me one last chance. I assure I will not disappoint anyone in Wikipedia anymore!! Please one last chance!! I'm not making an unblock request from my original account because User:Yamla pointed out that it will significantly less likely get unblocked. Can you just unblock this account or User:Amma&Papa account and observe my behavior for the next one week or one month? I told you that I was facing mental health issues earlier when I was using User:Commonedits which is why I breached WP:Civility. But now I will not repeat the same mistakes once again so please unblock me (if not give me a chance to prove that I will not breach WP:Civility). Isn't it fair enough to get one last chance? Ilovetvshows (talk) 07:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to obtain your last chance from your original account. With every new account you make to evade your block, that chance is less likely to be obtained. 331dot (talk) 08:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yet one more example of your inability to understand what you are told; Yamla did not say that your original account was less likely to be unblocked than this one, he said that your block evasion made it less likely that your original account would be unblocked than would otherwise have been the case. JBW (talk) 09:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]