User talk:Ikrewrwe

Welcome!

Hello, Ikrewrwe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:09, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Editing wikipedia involves sometimes have your edits reverted. Koncorde (talk) 11:56, 16 August 2017 (UTC)\[reply]

I accept that, but I would like them to be reverted for a legitimate reason. Ikrewrwe (talk) 11:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1. The contribution added nothing. It is errata, of no significance. Unless the fact that it was a latte, or Starbuck is notable, then it doesn't require that level of detail. 2. The sourcing should come from secondary or tertiary sources. In and of itself, the manifesto is not particularly notable an the content is relevant to the person, not the coffee brand he was drinking. Koncorde (talk) 12:27, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with more detail? Why do you so dogmatically oppose such edits?

Because this is an encyclopedia, not a blog of what you find to be significant about coffee. Koncorde (talk) 15:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ikrewrwe, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ikrewrwe! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

May 2018

You are amazing, thank you for your great work.

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —DoRD (talk) 17:57, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ikrewrwe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is zero evidence I am a sock puppet.Ikrewrwe (talk) 15:19, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not accurate. Yamla (talk) 15:56, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

While preparing to decline this as well(and as such I will not review any subsequent request by you) I examined your edits and believe that you need an attitude adjustment while editing and that you should be civil and stop using vulgar language. 331dot (talk) 16:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is accurate. Show me the evidence. There is none.Ikrewrwe (talk) 14:02, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So you don't deny it? 331dot (talk) 14:04, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't deny I had different accounts, but this account doesn't fit the definition of a sock-puppet account. I would like to see the definition of a sock-puppet. The reason I made THIS account is because I used to have an account last year but I only used that one at school. Since I left that school and forgot the password, I made a new account. Is that not allowed?Ikrewrwe (talk) 17:31, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The username that you previously used was blocked and the block is still in effect. By creating a new username, you evaded the block, which is why you were blocked for creating a sock puppet to violate Wikipedia policy. The best thing to do would be to return to that account and request to be unblocked, but you state that you forgot the password. I highly suggest that you try to remember it, but it you cannot, you can request an unblock here- stating that you forgot the password and also addressing the reasons the other username was blocked. I can't guarantee success, but that's probably one of the few open paths to an unblock for you. 331dot (talk) 19:56, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also see Help:Reset password and try to set a new password for your old account. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:04, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which account are you talking about? My account was never blocked.Ikrewrwe (talk) 13:35, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The account listed on your user page. 331dot (talk) 16:46, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, that's not my account. Why is that assumed?Ikrewrwe (talk) 17:45, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have no further comment on this matter. You can try to make that argument in an unblock request, though I think the odds of success are low. Either make such a request or move on. 331dot (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It would be useful if wikipedia was more clear on HOW to make such a request.Ikrewrwe (talk) 19:49, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You already made an unblock request once, just do it the same way. Instructions are in your block notice, simply copy and paste the designated text and fill in the information. 331dot (talk) 19:52, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reading WP:GAB may also help you. 331dot (talk) 19:53, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ikrewrwe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is zero evidence that this is a sock puppet account. To not unblock me despite this fact would be a disgrace. Show evidence or unblock me.

Decline reason:

Request declined, talk page access removed. Clearly disruptive and a sock. 331dot (talk) 20:35, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

One of your recent additions has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:18, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to be disruptive on this page, including posting clear copyvio images, I will remove talk page access. 331dot (talk) 20:29, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:27, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 20:33, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ikrewrwe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21578 was submitted on May 21, 2018 15:35:42. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:35, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]