User talk:Ikhtiar Hossain

'

Have Your Say

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Infobox:User (January 17)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to read the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit when you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Infobox:User.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! LukeSurl^{t c} 09:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

As you are a minor, you

January 2014

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to John Cena. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 12:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 3MB (professional wrestling)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 3MB (professional wrestling), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. STATic message me! 19:54, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of 3MB (professional wrestling)

A tag has been placed on 3MB (professional wrestling) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: [[File:Speedy delete contest button.svg|250px|link= -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Repeatedly re-creating deleted page

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at 3MB (professional wrestling), you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. You have now posted this material, or versions of it, at least four times, under different titles, despite the fact that you know full well that a deletion discussion resulted in a consensus that it should be deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:13, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Signature Taunt, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Second person and Cutthroat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:29, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fiddled sack.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fiddled sack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:32, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Finishing moves in professional wrestling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Finishing moves in professional wrestling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finishing moves in professional wrestling until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ES &L 10:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Dallas, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 11:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Signature Taunt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Signature Taunt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signature Taunt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ES &L 11:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Star Cineplax

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Star Cineplax requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Widr (talk) 11:17, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is not WWE Wiki

Although there is at least one Wiki in the world that is specifically related to wrestling and WWE, Wikipedia is not that place. We're an encyclopedia. If your expertise is solely in wrestling, please focus on improving the notable articles that we already have using proper sources, or you could take your knowledge to one of the many non-Wikipedia wikis that are specifically focused on your interest. I would hate to continue to see "articles" of yours deleted, simply because they are not appropriate for this project. Please also note that continually creating inappropriate articles can lead to a block. At the top of this page you encourage people to raise issues with your editing: as such, you need to actually pay attention and learn from the people who raise these issues ES &L 11:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FINAL WARNING

Your userpage is NOT an article. You may not EVER add {{featuredarticle}} to something that is not an article. It has been removed by multiple editors, and you have been advised as to why. If you add it additional times, you will be blocked. Stop already ES &L 12:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User cotributions

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 11:21, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CM Punk

Do not add week-by-week show updates to wrestler articles. Please read Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Style guide to understand how pro wrestling article formatting should be.

Summarize the career of the wrestler, but make sure you leave it to major events and key points. Try not to include week-by-week synopsis of what that wrestler did on whatever show they're on.

Antoshi ☏ ★ 14:13, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Wwe cenascooby.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Wwe cenascooby.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Antoshi ☏ ★ 13:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Wwe cenavsrock.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Wwe cenavsrock.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Antoshi ☏ ★ 13:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sohag Gazi may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* Sohag Gazi,]] is the only bowler to score a century and get a [[hat-trick]] in the same test match. He achieved

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:49, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mastermind School may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

//www.mastermindschool.org<br>https://www.facebook.com/pages/Mastermind-School/544218432289133]]<br>https://twitter.com/MastermindBD<br>https://plus.google.com/b/108863826819559123550/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:26, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop uploading non-free images like File:Master org.jpg. All the images you uploaded up to now have been deleted, because they all violated our copyright policies. Please do not upload any further images until you have thoroughly understood our project rules about them. If you make any more bad image uploads, you may be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:26, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniel Bryan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director of Operations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to WWE '13. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 07:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Cena, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 07:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Meena (character) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please reform

The image has been deleted because it violated Wikipedia's copyright requirements. You listed it as a "historical photo" when in reality you just stole it off of WWE.com. You cannot, without permission, download copyrighted images and then upload them to Wikipedia. In addition, I undid your edits to Doraemon as all you did was copy the entire List of Doraemon characters page and put it onto Doraemon. Obviously the List of Doraemon characters page exists for a reason, so you're literally just making an unnecessary addition. Also, thanks for completely copying my signature. Antoshi ☏ ★ 13:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Admr Boltz 17:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Meena official logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Meena official logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Admr Boltz 17:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ikhtiar Hossain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I uderstood the reason for which I am blocked. Ikhtiar ☏ ★♛

Decline reason:

Maybe you do, maybe you don't; there's no way for us to evaluate your understanding based on the above statement. If you wish to be unblocked, you will need to demonstrate - not simply claim - that you understand why you were blocked, and that you comprehend and will follow the relevant policies in future. An explanation of your supposed newfound understanding of copyright and licensing would be a good start. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you please explain why you were blocked in more detail to show you really do understand why you were blocked? What will you do differently if you are unblocked? only (talk) 11:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ikhtiar Hossain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I have been blocked for copyright violations and I promise that I would not do the mistake ever again. After I am blocked I would like to know about how to verify my Image upload and I will read the violating copyright policy and copyright policy. I hope and pray that I will be successfully unblocked. Thanks to User:Only to ask me to explain why I was blocked in more detail and to show I really do understand. Ikhtiar☏★/♛

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Admr Boltz 16:05, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please let it be noted that this user also made edits such as, adding dubious unsourced content and clear intentional BLP vandalism right before he was blocked. As you can tell by the page history, he has also created a sockpuppet account to continue editing. STATic message me! 15:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

posting the message below as it was obviously re-created by this guys sock

Repost of 3MB (professional wrestling team)

A tag has been placed on 3MB (professional wrestling team) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ikhtiar Hossain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am innocent. I 13:55, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That's even less satisfactory than your other two requests. — Daniel Case (talk) 01:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

==Suspension

People like User:Daniel Case and User:Admrboltz who blocked my account which is right to you, please move my User page and Talk pages' name to 'Blocked User' or something else, or just delete these pages. I do not want to keep my wikipedia account since I cannot edit anything.

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Infobox:User

Hello Ikhtiar Hossain. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Infobox:User".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Infobox:User}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 14:45, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ikhtiar Hossain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked indefinitely from editing in February 2014 mainly due to copyright violation. However, I created multiple accounts and was quickly suspected of sockpuppeting. It has been a while and I want to get this account of mine unblocked. I realize that my sockpuppet accounts further complicate things but I want to get unblocked only on this main account of mine. I deeply regret my actions. At the time I was young and immature who did not understand the internet. That does not excuse my actions and I feel guilty. I realize my vandalism and breach of policy and sincerely apologize. I want to contribute to Wikipedia the right way again and maintain my privacy as much as possible. I have read the general Wikipedia guidelines and policies. I want to leave a positive reputation on this platform. Again, I am ashamed of my past actions and want to redeem myself. Please take the time and consider my request. Thanks. Ikhtiar Hossain (talk) 18:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"basic copyediting" isn't meaningful enough for us to lift the block after your copyright violations. Yamla (talk) 13:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What edits do you want to make, if unblocked? PhilKnight (talk) 19:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PhilKnight I will stick to basic copyediting. Ikhtiar Hossain (talk) 19:47, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]