User talk:Ike Taylor Jr

October 2022

Hello, I'm Firefangledfeathers. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kyrie Irving have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

My friend pranked me. Thank you. Ike Taylor Jr (talk) 12:34, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Do you mean that your friend had control of your account and made the edit? See WP:COMPROMISED. --Yamla (talk) 12:43, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Yes. My friend took control of the account and did it. Ike Taylor Jr (talk) 14:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zaire Mitchell-Paden

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zaire Mitchell-Paden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaire Mitchell-Paden. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:23, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Kadarius Toney

I'm well aware of where you got that number from, however I'm not sure how he got that jersey. 19 is already taken by Matthew Wright and the Chiefs themselves haven't confirmed the trade. So please stop adding 19 until it's confirmed by the Chiefs he has it.--Rockchalk717 16:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Shut up you bastard he is wearing 19 Ike Taylor Jr (talk) 18:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

I am very sorry about my language. It was inappropriate and rude. Ike Taylor Jr (talk) 12:34, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Mike Brown (defensive back, born 1999) moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Mike Brown (defensive back, born 1999). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Willie Johnson (wide receiver)

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Willie Johnson (wide receiver), is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Patient Zero^talk 18:40, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Brown (defensive back, born 1999) (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Brown (defensive back, born 1999) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 19:23, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Ike Taylor Jr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 19:23, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Brown (defensive back, born 1999) (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Brown (defensive back, born 1999) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:38, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Brown (defensive back, born 1999) (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Brown (defensive back, born 1999) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 12:42, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Will Adams (defensive back)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Will Adams (defensive back) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 00:58, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Will Adams (defensive back) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Will Adams (defensive back), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Will Adams (defensive back) (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Will Adams (defensive back) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 00:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vegas Vipers roster

Template:Vegas Vipers roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:42, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Jah’Sheem Martin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jah’Sheem Martin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk) 01:52, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Will Adams (defensive back) (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Will Adams (defensive back) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:44, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Will Adams (defensive back) (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Will Adams (defensive back) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 08:51, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:2022 Cleveland Browns staff

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:2022 Cleveland Browns staff, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isaiah Weston (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Isaiah Weston and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:37, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Hello, I'm Yamla. An edit that you recently made to Ben Stille seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- Yamla (talk) 12:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ben Stille‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 12:41, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ike Taylor Jr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was originally doing a draft for Cleveland Browns tight end Zaire Mitchell-Paden, and I was using Ben Stille who is a rookie to help me with my draft, but after doing part of the draft, I accidentally realized I was on the Ben Stille page. I am very sorry for what I did. Please unblock me. 

Decline reason:

You were blocked for abuse of multiple accounts. You will need to address this reason specifically in any appeals.Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

another unblock reason

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ike Taylor Jr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sometimes, I abused other users because I was mad, and also I really wanted one of my articles published. I promise I will no longer abuse users and help Wikipedia. Ike Taylor Jr (talk) 19:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm not sure that you should have been blocked in the first place, but your responses here have left me thinking that you should stay blocked until you start making coherent sense. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dude. Did you not read the link that Ponyo posted? You're in a different geographical area than the suspected sock master, though. Do you have a connection to User:NateDawg652? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:38, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Yes, I do. User:NateDawg652 was the person who blocked me for sockpuppetry for vandalism and abuse. The vandalism was an accident, and the abuse was because I was mad, because I kept being declined for simple drafts on NFL players that went undrafted this year. Ike Taylor Jr (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

I give up. You're either trolling, incompetent, or an unconvincing AI chat program. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Note that any admin is free to lift the block if convinced this user is unrelated and if, you know, WP:CIR would not apply. This is specifically not a checkuser block, just a regular block. --Yamla (talk) 17:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

This makes sense

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ike Taylor Jr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok. I am not AI or I am not incompetent or I am not trolling. I was doing a draft for a Cleveland Browns tight end Zaire Mitchell-Paden and I was using a rookie page for rookie Ben Stille so I could use his example, but I accidentally was using the Ben Stille page on accident, and then I had to try to restore the page quickly, but I had to go to pick my kids up from school. Please unblock me and I will do better for Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Previously, the abuse was due to you being "mad", now it was an accident because you had to pick your kids up. I do not know what to believe. You still have not commented on the abuse of multiple accounts. I am declining this request. In your next unblock request you really should address the the overlap in editing between you and NateDawg652. PhilKnight (talk) 12:22, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ike Taylor Jr (talk) 18:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

You are blocked because of the overlap in editing between you and NateDawg652. --Yamla (talk) 18:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Abusing other accounts

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ike Taylor Jr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was abusing them because they declined me. I really wanted to get one of my drafts published. I just want to go back to doing not bad, but good things. I want to make articles. I want to edit pages. I will no longer do abuse or vandalizing. I will use my personal sandbox to help me make good articles. I just want someone who gets me and knows my personality. I have no relation to User:NateDawg652. I am not a sockpuppet of him. I literally have no idea how you guys thought I was one of his sock puppets. It was an editing accident, and I didn’t mean it.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I'm not buying it. This edit right here: [1] tells me that an unblock of you will be a bad idea. That is not an "editing accident". RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reply to you, RickinBaltimore

I know. It was a sneaky edit that was rude and disrespectful. I had no clue what I was thinking. Read another unblock request that I made below, and see what I talked about. Thanks! Ike Taylor Jr (talk) 12:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Overlap with NateDawg652

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ike Taylor Jr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

How was I even overlap editing? I am confused. I don’t even relate with User:NateDawg652.

Decline reason:

Please only make one unblock request at a time. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disruption

For the next reviewing admin, please take a look at this disruption spree. I have protected this talk page for a week to give the user a chance to smarten up. -- Yamla (talk) 17:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Can you understand me?

I am not a sockpuppet. Do any of you understand that this was an editing accident? Ike Taylor Jr (talk) 12:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Please, trust me.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ike Taylor Jr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Seriously, the edit where I edited my talk page unblock was disrespectful and rude, and I was trying to get unblocked. I was trying to get myself unblocked, and then I realized that when I edited the unblock, I knew I was being watched and knew my page would be protected. Unblocking me would not be bad, RickinBaltimore, because it actually was an accident and it was bad too, but, please trust me for once, and I can do good, for Wikipedia. I don't want to keep doing this hassle. Just please trust me.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. I have reblocked this as a compromised account, as per your statement here. As you already know from reading WP:COMPROMISED, this is the end of the line. As you have no committed identity, there is no way we can verify you have regained control of your account. That means no unblock requests will be considered. Yamla (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

waiting...

I have been waiting for my previous unblock request to be reviewed. I just want a nice, friendly admin to review the unblock request and see what happens. Thanks! Ike Ike Taylor Jr (talk) 15:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

I WISH THIS NEVER HAPPENED!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ike Taylor Jr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I wish I could be unblocked. I have no connections to NateDawg652. The user, my friend AlexR controlled my account before I got it back. I miss doing good things for this community. You guys made me have bad feelings after I was blocked. I am not a compromised user or sockpuppet. Thank you.

Decline reason:

You just said again that your account is WP:COMPROMISED; thus, we will not unblock. No idea why you're invoking the name of an editor who has not been active since 2006. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:53, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ike Taylor Jr (talk) 15:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Can I create a new account?

I want to have a new account, but my IP address is blocked. Ike Taylor Jr (talk) 16:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Given your disruption, I'm opposed. You are free to do so if but only if a different administrator clears you to do so. Your best bet is to go six months with zero edits, then claim WP:SO. --Yamla (talk) 18:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

What does that mean? Ike Taylor Jr (talk) 18:23, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Which part do you not understand? --Yamla (talk) 18:23, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

So does that mean my IP address will be unblocked if I don't do any edits for six months? If you can, try to get another admin to unblock my IP, because that would really help. Thanks! Ike Taylor Jr (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

No. Reread WP:SO. Blocks apply to the person. You personally are blocked. --Yamla (talk) 18:28, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

New talks in the works

I read WP:SO and saw that I could be on the good side after 6 months. The good thing is that I could possibly be unblocked after a discussion. The bad thing would be that I would have to wait until August to start the discussion.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ike Taylor Jr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I actually wasn't using an excuse, here's the story. I was on a call with my best friend, Alex. He told me, "Ike. Kyrie Irving was traded to the Lakers!" That made me go to Wikipedia to edit him, but that went too far, because I realized that there wasn't any trade. I was new, so I didn't know that I could undo the edit. The reason I was disruptive was because I hated being blocked, so I tried to change my declines to accepts, but then I realized that you guys would protect my page and undo the edit. It was because I kept being rejected and I missed editing and making articles. For the WP:COMPROMISED, my friend is not a Wikipedia user, just a normal person. He forced me to do it. Trust me, I can be on the good side of things. Consider that I am a positive, not a negative.

Decline reason:

Not a positive. Drmies (talk) 20:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #69558

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:56, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

What is the code? User:Ike Taylor Jr (talk) 20:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

• -- Deepfriedokra, I'm going to close this talk page; we're all wasting our time here, including Ike Taylor's time. I'm doing this in part because I don't like hoaxing, and you know I have a very special compass, which doesn't point to Louisiana. Drmies (talk) 20:14, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

  Okey dokey -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

  RE: " He forced me to do it." That being the case, I see no way this user can ever contribute constructively. No way to know what they might be coerced into next. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2023 (UTC)