User talk:IkbenFrank

Welcome

Greetings...

Hello, IkbenFrank, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To get started, click on the green welcome.

I hope you like it here and decide to stay!

Happy editing! RashersTierney (talk) 01:01, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Links to N I Railways

Hi IkbenFrank. I'm going to revert a few of your recent edits (Lifford and Strabane as examples) as you can't just add a link to a timetable in the body of an article nor is Wikipedia and place for links. What you did at Portrush is better as at least it is in some context but again I will be removing the direct link but leave the text. Bjmullan (talk) 21:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Lough Foyle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greencastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

I have reverted your edit to Privatisation of British Rail as you provided no reference for the statement which you made. Please remember Wikipedia's principle of verifiability, and if you wish to reinsert the material please provide a reference to a reliable source. - David Biddulph (talk) 08:48, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

First Great Western (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cardiff railway station

Northern Ireland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sydenham railway station

Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Glasgow Central

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for Mar 2

Hi. When you recently edited Gloucester to Newport Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cheltenham railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. When you recently edited Cotswolds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cheltenham railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Cambridge, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pontificalibus (talk) 22:32, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stations in South Wales

Hi, this navbox that you've been adding to lots of station articles - why is it not set up as a template? That way, the code needs to be in only one place, and for an amendment, you don't need to go through every article all over again. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:15, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, seeing as you didn't reply, I've fixed them all up. The template is {{Commuter Stations: Cardiff Local Lines run by Arriva Trains Wales}} - the name was kind of forced on me because you had used |name=Commuter Stations: Cardiff Local Lines run by Arriva Trains Wales.

Please see: (i) WP:NAV for general information on navboxes; (ii) WP:TEMPLATE on how to create and use templates; (iii) WP:FOOTERS on where navboxes should be placed. --Redrose64 (talk) 00:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The Original Barnstar
		I just wanted to say, after looking through your recent edits, thank you for your work improving countless Northern Ireland rail related articles. Keep it up! NorthernCounties (talk) 14:33, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Derry

Hi IkbenFrank, just to make you aware that on Wikipedia the city is known as Derry. For more information see WP:DERRY. Bjmullan (talk) 23:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:58, 3 April 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, IkbenFrank. You have new messages at Redrose64's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Redrose64 (talk) 11:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dangerous Road for Pedestrians

Category:Dangerous Road for Pedestrians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 17:46, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited A46 road (Northern Ireland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belleek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A32 road (Northern Ireland)

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of A32 road (Northern Ireland), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: A32 road (Ireland). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 12:25, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A34 road (Northern Ireland)

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of A34 road (Northern Ireland), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: A34 road (Ireland). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 13:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moving page

In future if you want to move a page to a new title please use the move tool. Don't just copy and paste the content, as this destroys the edit history (which we need to keep for legal reasons). Hut 8.5 14:16, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that too. Please see HELP:MOVE and WP:CUTPASTE. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

A5 road (Northern Ireland) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aughnacloy

Armstrong Whitworth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bascule

Belfast–Derry railway line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bascule

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, I'm Jeff G.. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sligo station, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 20:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Diamond, Donegal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaelic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lagan Canal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moira (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ballymacarrett railway station, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bangor and Mainline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm TexasAndroid. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Mac Diarmada railway station without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! TexasAndroid (talk) 15:42, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Haarlem railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to NS

Oostende railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Scottish

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wenduine / Wenduine, Belgium

Hello, why did you create Wenduine, Belgium while an article Wenduine exists? Both pages are identical now... SPQRobin (talk) 22:11, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, never mind, Wenduine was a redirect. I suppose we can just make Wenduine, Belgium redirect to Wenduine? SPQRobin (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Amiens Street, Dublin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Liffey

Berck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Norse

Blankenberge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to NMS

Eeltsje Boates Folkertsma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Frisian language

Geart Aeilco Wumkes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Frisian language

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category sort keys

Hi, re edits like this, this, this, this, this and others - please do not use a space as the sort key unless the article is the key article for a category, as described at WP:SORTKEY. The key article for Category:Deutsche Bahn is Deutsche Bahn; that for Category:SNCF is SNCF; that for Category:Nederlandse Spoorwegen is Nederlandse Spoorwegen. Thanks. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Privatisation of British Rail (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Grand Central

Transport in Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Stirling railway station

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Transport in Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Glasgow Central and Wigan railway station

Ballycotton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dark Ages

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British Rail Class 421, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guildford railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cheltenham Minster, St Mary's, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King William I (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Holyhead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Breakwater (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's some mileage in this

Hi IkbenFrank, I've noticed (and support) the mileage you added to A48 road. The normal way of doing this is to use the convert template which keeps a uniform style and prioritises mileage in UK/US articles. It also supports many other units of measure. The syntax I have used on your edit is:

{{convert|27|mi|adj=on}}

which reads as 27-mile (43 km). The adj parameter deletes the "s" from "miles", for normal expressions of length you would simply use:

{{convert|27|mi}}

which reads as 27 miles (43 km). Hope you find this useful in your editing! Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 12:10, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Easter Rising, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royal Irish Regiment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Railway "re-openings"

Please do not change the status of railways and stations unless you can source the changes. An organization may be "working towards" a re-opening but unless you include a reliable source for these changes they are liable to reversion. Britmax (talk) 15:09, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oxford Bus Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hippodrome Wallonie, Mons

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hippodrome Wallonie, Mons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jinkinson talk to me 19:34, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drybrook Road railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coleford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Outline of the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free Church of Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Belfast–Larne railway line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Single track

Double track (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gare de Lille

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Herefordshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newport station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Welsh Newton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cairnryan Harbour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Glasgow Central

Port of Belfast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Glasgow Central

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited York railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Rail Class 43 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Great Western Main Line diagram

Why the arbitrary removal of {{UK road}} and the inexplicable promotion of road names to the same level as station names? Useddenim (talk) 00:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've more or less reverted all of IkbenFrank's changes to this diagram.

However, I've also removed the road badges, following this discussion about them. Bluebird207 (talk) 15:01, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Network Rail vs National Rail

Network Rail is an infrastructure company, National Rail is the railway network. I am reverting your changes. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:19, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Curragh Racecourse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nurney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Virginia Water, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richmond railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mendip Vale railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wells

South West England (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wells

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited County Cavan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tralee may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|coauthors= |year=1968 |publisher=Mercier Press |location= |isbn= |page= |pages=216–217 Appendix II) |url= |accessdate=}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:16, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Manchester Piccadilly station

added a link pointing to Carlisle

Stranraer

added a link pointing to Glasgow Central

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Mary's Cathedral, Tuam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High Cross. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

United Kingdom

Hello, Please stop adding images to United Kingdom without gaining support from other editors on the article's talk page. The question of which images to use on that important page has been much discussed over time and it is no use one editor arbitrarily adding more pictures without consultation. Thanks, Alarics (talk) 09:56, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Virginia Water, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Guildford railway station and Kingston railway station. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm Mutt Lunker. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Yes Scotland because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:25, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Salthill. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Charles (talk) 13:16, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Cheltenham Spa railway station, you may be blocked from editing. Charles (talk) 09:01, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Irish connections

Hi. I know it's 6 months late, but I just noticed and removed your addition of Irish ferry information from Bristol Parkway railway station. While I have no doubt what you added is accurate, it's not particularly relevant - your statement seems to be that with two changes, you could be in Ireland. The same could be said of France and Belgium via Eurostar, or pretty much any country in the world by getting a train to Paddington, changing for a Heathrow Express, then getting on a plane. Generally in a station article I'd be wary of even mentioning places you can get to by a single change (although I make an exception for branch line stations). Anyway, this is all old news, but I thought I should clarify my thinking on this. Thanks for making UK rail articles better! -mattbuck (Talk) 18:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Inishowen. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 09:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Railway stations opened by British Rail

Please stop adding Category:Railway stations opened by British Rail indiscriminately. The category is not for reopenings, but for stations that were first opened between 1 January 1948 and 31 March 1994. For stations first opened outside that period, other categories exist, and most of the station articles that you have edited were already in one of those. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:31, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to draw your attention again to my note of six months ago; in particular, any station first opened on or after 1 April 1994 was not opened by British Rail but by one of its successor organisations. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:49, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No heading for the lede

Your addition of a section heading to the lede of the Euston article was reverted, but you added it again (so I reverted it again). Please read Wikipedia:Lede#Elements of the lead where it says: "The lead itself has no heading ...". Various other parts of the MOS say the same thing in different words. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Omagh may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[A5 road (Northern Ireland)|A5]] (Northbound) (Omagh – Strabane [and from here north-west to Letterkenny, via [[Lifford]] on the [[A38 road (Northern Ireland)|A38]],

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:53, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:52, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Merseyrail may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

office "Abellio Group Head Office" Group corporate website, Abellio, Utrecht, Netherlands, Undate].<Retrieved 19 June 2015.</ref>, and is formed of two electrified lines of the [[National Rail]]
(Figures shown are attributable to ''Merseyrail Electrics 2002 Ltd'', (who operate the Northern and

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:25, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Langport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Rail Class 43. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dublin Bus Route 53

The article Dublin Bus Route 53 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a travel guide or whatever. There is no reason given why this particular bus route is in any way notable. Buscruft.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 14:10, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dundalk, Newry and Greenore Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlingford. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Causeway Coast and Glens, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages North Channel and Ballycastle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Monmouth may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

station|Monmouth Troy]] to {{stnlnk|Chepstow}}, [[Ross-on-Wye railway station|Ross-on-Wye]] (thence to either {{stnlnk|Hereford}} and {{stnlnk|Gloucester}}.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:22, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited South Wales, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages British Rail Class 43 and Arable. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Glenluce railway station, South West Scotland) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Glenluce railway station, South West Scotland, IkbenFrank!

Wikipedia editor Zppix just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Awesome

To reply, leave a comment on Zppix's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gatehouse of Fleet, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 22:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heathrow Airport Holdings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pennine Way may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of England".<ref>Poucher, page 9</ref> Although not the United Kingdom's longest National Trail (this distinction used to belong to the {{convert|1014|km|mi|adj=on|disp=flip}}<ref>{{cite web |url=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:36, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The UK and trains in decade articles

There is absolutely no reason to separate the UK from Europe in political activities.

As for trains, something along the lines of the automobile section seems appropriate, but you've added entirely too much detail, and probably not about the most notable railways. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:20, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The US is part of the Americas in the political sections; why should the UK not be part of Europe. I'm not going to revert you again, but yuo have not supplied credible justification for separating out the UK. Furthermore, the nonstandard header level used for Europe makes it impossible to put the UK at a sub-level, where it would belong, if separated. I'm going to put a content tag on the articles you've (IMO) damaged. Please self-revert until consensus can be obtained, as information is likely to get lost when putting it back.

You're probably correct about railroads, though. I'll ping Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains for more input.

Finally, you should reply in this thread. You are not using the agreed communication conventions by (1) replying on my talk page, (2) not signing your statements, and (3) not using proper header conventions. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:44, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read WP:OVERLINK, WP:EGG, and WP:SEAOFBLUE. Please comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years#Decades, the UK and Europe, and trains, if you can do so without damaging the structure. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't read any of my suggested reading. You're also not supplying the correct header level. Politics must remain level 3, making continents level 4, and the countries (including the UK) level 5. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:29, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you refuse to discuss the matter on any talk page, I have no choice other than to request you be blocked. To do other than just revert all changes in the sections, including any additions made by others, would take more time than maintenance of the articles is worth. See centralized discussion in WT:YEARS. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited English language in Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulster Scots. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2010s Prominent Political events

Hello there, we appreciate your determination and good faith in editing the 2010s page but please be mindful in what you edit. Major edits, for example, giving the United Kingdom its own section in the prominent political events, is contradictory to page's format and should not be edited without discussion. Said discussion can be made in the Talk:2010s page. Also, additional United Kingdom events should be discussed on the talk page so as to not overflow the section with unnecessary events. For now, your edits will be undone to keep with the article's format. Thank you. ProjectHorizons (talk) 17:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HEADINGS RAIL NATIONALISATION

Hi I have noticed that you have changed a heading in the Limehouse entry to Rail Nationalisation 1949-1994. Over the past months (years maybe I lost track) I have been updating various East Anglian and South Eastern station history sections and consistently using British Railways as this sub-heading title. It generally fits with other operators LNER (1923-1947) and GER (1862-1922) in the other time periods. I am not going to go through and change all my edits to Rail Nationalisation as I am far more interested in posting historical detail on what are generally poor entries rather than this type of repetitive activity. In the spirit of Wikipedia friendship and co-operation would be grateful if you could re-consider your alteration here and revert it so there is a consistent format. If you do feel this is a better way of representing the historical periods then feel free to change all my other entries - I have no interest in edit warring just consistency. Cheers.--Davidvaughanwells (talk) 14:06, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deutsche Bahn

Hi IkbenFrank, I've reverted your addition of the Category:Deutsche Bahn to Arriva divisions as there's been no consensus to add it and seeing as there's been multiple warrings over it it's best you go to Talk:Arriva and get consensus, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 10:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Newry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlingford. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Honeybourne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Rail Class 43. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm Redrose64. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rail transport in Staffordshire, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:37, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prayer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grace. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Godewaersvelde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nord Department. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsche Bahn

Please get consensus before adding Deutsche Bahn to any article and infobox, You've been told before to get consensus for it, Keep adding it and you could end up blocked for disruptive editing, Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 18:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Railways - please stop

Hi. I'm sure you believe you are editing in good faith but please refrain from making superfluous additions about railways to Wikipedia articles. We are now working to revert many of your edits. Please note that there are now around 80 complaints on your talk page already, many of which are administrative warnings. If you continue your disruption you may find your editing privileges will have to be restricted. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prynhawn da! Adding to this, I have have had to copy-edit your overlong additions made to Pembrokeshire today. — Gareth Griffith-Jones | The Welsh | Buzzard | 15:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, IkbenFrank. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Glastonbury. Hoaxes are eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G3. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Referring to your addition [image] immediately below the Info' box. — Gareth Griffith-Jones | The Welsh | Buzzard | 13:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Worth Way, you may be blocked from editing. Charles (talk) 10:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Southern Railway strike (2016-2017). Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 17:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Smog into Commuting. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:11, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rail Safety and Standards Board. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DBaK (talk) 23:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Harold Wilson, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Appears to disproportionately identify a railway point of view without attributing to Harold Wilson, see also elsewhere on your talk page. Futhermore some useful Cycling information around Sligo Town has been changed/reverted as not appropriately added to the article, see Rosses Point and the R291 road (Ireland) for a more acceptable approach. If unsure considering adding the information to a talk page for someone else to add to the article or to discuss first. Thankyou for your contributions - identifying information on Urban Cycle Sligo is certainly appropriate to be added those the articles Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Djm-leighpark (talk) 17:41, 4 May 2017 (UTC) Link is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User: IkbenFrank continual mild disruptive editing over a number of articles. Djm-leighpark (talk) 02:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An admin on that discussion has indicated I have incorrectly raised that ANI-notice so plase accept my apologies. Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:00, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please see Talk:Quedgeley#Segregated_Bicycle_Path_entry for discussion of Bicycle path and apparent issues.
Please also consider contributions with regards to cycling carefully. Your recent contribution https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cheltenham&type=revision&diff=783370440&oldid=783283067 appears to be forcing something about bicycles onto an article rather than genuinely improving an article. I am minded in this case the contribution is superfluous and has dis-improved the totality of the article.

Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:53, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion for concencus about the Cycling contribution has been begun at Talk:Cheltenham. Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

The use of gallery seems at odds with WP:GALLERY guidelines and seems to have been used to shoehorn cycling and railway interests, particularly one image previously removed. I accept this may have been a good-faith work-around edit however #June 2017 should have let you to the discussion on the talk page. Please review on [[[Talk:Cheltenham]] and discuss. Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=6ybvGHdBVVUDi1D_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_57rnLKaLyg0bGSN&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 20:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More shoehorning of bicycle rack images

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gloucestershire. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Continuing to inappropriately promote WP:FRINGE interests of cycling (and trains) by adding what most would regard as non central images and other content to articles WP:IUP whilst continuing to ignore discussion is continuing to be disruptive. Hence content is being reverted but you are welcome to discuss for consensus or third party mediation on the appropriate article talk page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm-leighpark (talk • contribs) 20:34, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Communication problems with IkbenFrank. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Articles on Wikipedia do not give fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles are given representation in proportion to their prominence. The image relating to Irish Language give undue prominence to Railways, which appears to be one of your pet subjects. As such it continues to be disruptive and I have undone it from Tipperary and Status of the Irish language (the latter *might* have been more acceptable if there wasn't already a tram and there was more prominence of the Irish language signs ... the presence of 3 non prominent signs in a larger picture is interesting I' not sure is works on articles). In general if you introduce railways to a non railway article the result will almost certainly be low level disruption. I can possibility understand you have tried to see how far you can go shoehorning pet subjects into inappropriate articles .... the answer is likely the community cannot afford to tolerate it and I would guess will lead to a resurrection of the ANI and quite possibly an immediate block. On the plus side a couple of your recent edits for example Sligo have been helpful and more edits like those are appreciated and you use of edit summaries is also noted as a plus point.Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Welsh Language. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ………Despite the request at #Edit summaries recently you appear to be continuing not to use edit summaries. While you correctly and usefully identified information that Welsh Language is used in services in a church in London and that this may be useful for Welsh Language speakers the manner this was added to the See also section was sub-optimal and non-obvious. But the really important point is you have continued to ignore the community request to use edit summaries despite an earlier request. As such WP:DISRUPTSIGNS continue to apply and a level 2 warning is probably appropriate. Your edit has been undone then redone with an edit summaryDjm-leighpark Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:07, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, IkbenFrank. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Experiences survey

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stranorlar railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strabane railway station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:17, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Meuse/Maas

Hi Ikben, could I ask you to please stop changing Meuse to Maas. Although both are used in English, "Meuse" is about twice as common in book sources and so we don't prefer "Maas" over "Meuse". Thanks. Bermicourt (talk) 06:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Emission standard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Diesel

MOT test (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Diesel

Vehicle emissions control (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Diesel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, IkbenFrank. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Railway stations opened by British Rail is inappropriate

Please stop making edits like this. The category page states, right at the top, "This category is for railway stations in Great Britain first opened by British Railways or British Rail, i.e. between 1 January 1948 and 31 March 1994". Please observe the words "first opened". For reopened stations we categorise by original company, and this particular one already has Category:Former North British Railway stations. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sandycove and Glasthule railway station has been nominated for merging

Category:Sandycove and Glasthule railway station has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rhys & Mommsen references on Turkdean

Hi, Ages ago you added references to Rhys 1901, pp. 520–2 & Mommsen 1898 p.217 to the Turkdean. I was wondering if you still had the relevant books and could add the full details?— Rod ^talk 19:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Linkspam/cycleni.com

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be misplaced and/or inappropriate for the project. Repeatedly adding links to the same site or page (across multiple articles), as you did here, here and elsewhere, is generally considered a form of WP:LINKSPAM. Issues are exacerbated when the links added have very limited relevance to the article subject, and when the links are added to the body (or "see also" sections). Where external links (of any kind) should not be included. Please consider your motivations for adding links to this website across multiple unrelated articles (and whether these edits are consistent with the content, LINKSPAM, EL, PROMO and MOS guidelines). Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 13:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Botanic Avenue

The article Botanic Avenue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources or even asserted beyond bare existence

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]