User talk:Ikangethe

Removal of text

Do not delete sourced text as you did here Bangabandhu (talk) 14:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, How should i approach such a change?? Ikangethe (talk) 17:49, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see you did it again, despite this warning. Don't delete sourced text or add text that's unsupported by the references. You should also avoid any language that's obviously promotional and unencyclopedic. You also need to disclose paid editing. Bangabandhu (talk) 23:23, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan Gikabu (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ingenuity were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only one of the references is good at all. The second doesn't mention him, the third is not significant, and the fourth won't load. If you have a conflict of interest with the subject of this draft, please declare so on your user page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan Gikabu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:06, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ikangethe! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:06, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jonathan Gikabu

Hello, Ikangethe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jonathan Gikabu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]