User talk:Ijzerstop

February 2020

Hello, I'm INeedSupport. Your recent edit(s) to the page 2019–20 European windstorm season appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. INeedSupport ^❄️ 16:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Capewearer (talk) 09:15, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ijzerstop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just want to edit and i luv this <3 Ijzerstop (talk) 10:15, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No thanks, we can do without you promoting incest here thank you very much. Yamla (talk) 10:19, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ijzerstop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I am already blocked for 2,5 years from this wikipedia, I've improved my behavior and i luv this <3 Ijzerstop (talk) 09:59, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Really, that's too bad. You crossed a line. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:10, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ijzerstop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I find it unfair that I'm still looked at for mistakes I've made 2,5 years ago, when I was 13 years old. It was in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic so I was at a high level of boredness due to the coronavirus lockdown. I've apparantly promoted incest back then, which is morally reprehensible and I agree with that. The block was a justified action issued back then. But now, 2,5 years later, I'm 16 years old, so I'd think that the block is no longer needed as I'm a responsible Wikipedian and I would love to come back. I want to edit articles again and engage in a positive behavior with other Wikipedians. I've improved my behavior significantly compared to back then, and I wish to come back at this Wikipedia to prove that I've reflected on my obnoxious behavior back then, and that I've actually changed my behavior. I want to bring a positive vibe within the community if I re-turn as fully trusted Wikipedian that can again edit. I indeed crossed a line back then, but it will not happen again. Ijzerstop (talk) 15:58, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed block evasion, reblocked to reflect this. Yamla (talk) 16:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.