User talk:Id 1948
Your addition to Desert has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Desert
[edit]I have removed some of the information you added to the article Desert because it was a copyright violation of this source. You can see the report of Duplicate Detector here which compares the two web pages and looks for similarities. This shows that you copied and pasted several complete sentences from the source. This is unacceptable and you can see Wikipedia's policy on copyright at this page. If you want to replace the information, you need to summarise it in your own words. The first part of what you added did not seem to be a copyright violation and I have left it in place, edited it a little, mostly by adding capital letters where appropriate. If you need any help with editing Wikipedia, please ask. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up and clarifying what I did wrong
Still learning how to edit and update sections on wikipedia, will be sure to reference rather than directly copy and paste in the future. Id 1948 (talk) 04:56, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
I see you have been making edits on Wikipaedia since 2011 so you really ought to have read some of its style guidelines by now and learned to give reasons for changes. I reversed yours because to my eyes, as an experienced editor in 'real' life, I saw them to be unencyclopaedic and fussy. "600+" is a lazy example of unencyclopaedic expression; "tales, fables and literature", followed by "anecdotes" later, is an example of fussy piling up of verbiage. I was also unhappy at the unsensitive AD, which is a Christian designation, used to 'clarify' the date of an Arab work, which should properly be expressed by an AH date in brackets; or you could have used the more neutral CE. Finally, why change "Arabs" to "The Arabs", as if the entire race was involved?
You have demanded that a reason for wishing to undo an edit should be given you 'before doing so'. That is not Wikipaedia practice. In your turn, if you were unhappy about the facts in that section, you could have brought the matter up on the Talk page. Some useful guidelines are given at WP:MOS. I hope you now understand my concerns. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 09:02, 14 January 2016 (UTC)