User talk:Mzilikazi1939

Cavalier

Your edit to cavalier (Revision as of 12:51, 10 April 2017) removed all the long citations that supported the short ones diff .I have reverted the edit because you removed the long citations. If you are not familiar with this style of citing see WP:CITESHORT and Help:Shortened footnotes.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mzilikazi1939. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Circe in the arts) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Circe in the arts.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Circe in the arts" is an excellent article. Don't know if you're still working on it.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Steve Quinn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Steve Quinn (talk) 02:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Etaples art colony.(article November 2013).

Etaples art colony - The multiple issues have been unaddressed for nearly seven years. The article needs a drastic rewrite to get it to Wikipedia standard. Are you able to rewrite and address the multiple issues because there is some good information in there? Some of the links are dead. Would you like help with the rewrite?Dorkinglad (talk) 00:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

I no longer edit under this name. After I originally created the article in question I left to help edit an art encyclopedia on the other side of the world and had only limited online access outside office hours for most of a couple of years. Unable to reply to the negative criticism at the time, I lost heart and never returned to it. I'd be inclined to tell you to go ahead with sorting the article out but have a few doubts about your knowledge of the subject. Your reasoning on whether there was a real colony in the town suggests massive ignorance. At that period there were colonies all along or just inland from the sea coast from Worpsewede in Germany, across the Netherlands and Belgium and then down to Brittany, of greater or lesser significance. In the case of most, their importance and documentation has been largely a matter of hindsight, but there are major books that cover Étaples and its artists and speak of it as a colony (or rather, a nest of colonies). Two factors rather fog the picture: one is that the significance of many of the North American and Oz/NZ artists, being expats, was not realised until later in their own countries. Their advanced styles relate to what was happening in Paris (only 3 hours away from them by train) and these trends often didn't have a name. The term Post-Impressionist (to which their style relates) was not even coined until 1910 when Roger Fry was casting about for the title of an exhibition he organised in Britain. So if you want to take the subject on, you'll need to have an interest in cultural development across frontiers and an appreciation of the fluidity of artistic styles. It was those phenomena that attracted me to the subject of the article at the start; I rather suspect that it is the way they challenge simplistic color-supplement notions that brought down criticism in the first place! I'll be happy to offer back-seat guidance if you feel equal to the effort. It requires sustained scholarship, not just snipping along the edges. Sweetpool50 (talk) 11:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Avarice Lincoln Cathedral West.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Avarice Lincoln Cathedral West.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:50, 21 October 2021 (UTC)