User talk:IbrahimWeed

Speedy deletion nomination of American-Bengali War

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as American-Bengali War, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Simplexity22 (talk) 22:50, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. EkoGraf (talk) 06:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Iraqi Civil War

Stop!

There is a discussion going on at the article's talk page to discuss if whether the war really ended or not. Until a consensus is reached, please do not change the tittle of the article. Thank you. Coltsfan (talk) 16:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Liberation of Kuwait campaign, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:00, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Iraqi civil war moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Iraqi civil war, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 17:01, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Baqubah (2014) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Baqubah (2014), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 15:53, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Iraqi revolt of 1920

Care to explain this? I want to assume you made that edit in good faith, but in the future, please don't insert claims that are just plain wrong. Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 15:44, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Cuties, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:52, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]

You have been blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges in relation to information which has been removed from Wikipedia's public records.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org.

Administrators: Information which has been oversighted was considered when this block was placed. Therefore the Oversight team or the Arbitration Committee must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing oversight blocks without permission from an oversighter risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

If you wish to appeal this block, please email the address above. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:21, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IbrahimWeed, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Idell (talk) 10:30, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Iraqi civil war

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Iraqi civil war. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 03:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Baqubah (2014)

Hello, IbrahimWeed. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Baqubah (2014), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Baqubah (2014)

Hello, IbrahimWeed. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Baqubah".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:45, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Baghdad (2006–2008)

The article Battle of Baghdad (2006–2008) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn’t look like much of a battle. Lacks WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 04:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Baghdad (2006–2008) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Baghdad (2006–2008) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Baghdad (2006–2008) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]